• Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s not “entitled” to require someone to

    What, are you entitled to that response? No? Then you are not entitled. If you are still demanding it, you are “entitled”

    • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s not “demanding” anything. It’s predicated on the simple fact that nobody is a mindreader. How many times do I have to restate that?

      You’re the one making demands that people should be reading minds, so if anyone has an entitled outlook here it’s you.

      • Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        sometimes you will be wrong

        If you think this means you need to be a mind reader, you need a lesson for graceful failure.

        • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Huh? I thought you blocked me. Why are you still responding? In fact, don’t talk to me. There, I made my boundary clear. So if you really mean what you say about not being entitled to talk to people, then you’ll respect that boundary by leaving me alone.

          By the way, what you were insisting, would require mind reading, and cherry-picking small snippets devoid of context to say they don’t require mind-reading doesn’t change that.