Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid - welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned so many ā€œesotericā€ right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged ā€œculture criticsā€ who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this, and happy 4th July in advance.)

  • BioMan@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    Ā·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    From the inimitable writers of AI2027, we now have…

    AI2040!

    https://ai-2040.com/

    Typical nonsense. Among other things they are talking 6fold increase in GDP by 2032 in their scenario, MOSTLY driven by neural networks generating text (and one extra currrent GDP driven by robots) and median personal income being 1 million dollars (inflation adjusted) by 2035.

    I am particularly amused that they have all the politicking happening in the next presidential administration rather than this year so they can pretend that all their governmental fantasies will happen because someone sane will naturally come to the conclusions they would.

    • scruiser@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      Ā·
      3 hours ago

      My favorite part was the section where they worked out the logistics of China hiding a data center inside of a mountain.

    • lurker@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      Ā·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Oh damn, they originally said it was gonna be called AI 2030, so they pushed it back a bit

      It’s not a rehash of AI 2027 with moved-back timelines like I thought it would be, instead its what they believe should happen in regards to AI development

      Plan A is our positive vision for what should happen instead. In this scenario, humanity delays the development of superintelligence until 2040, makes all AI research public, allows dozens of companies globally to catch up to the frontier, and intentionally enters a regime of mutually assured compute destruction.

      And in the first footnote:

      So far reality is tracking closer to AI 2027 than even we expected. (2027 was our modal year at time of publication, not our median.)

      According to them, preliminary analysis of the data as of July 2026 says that rate of progress is 75% of AI 2027. This says Daniel K only believes in a 25% chance of AGI by the end of 2027, their model also hasn’t changed so their medians are still shown as beyond 2027. Footnote 11 also flat-out says they have no idea how much things will keep progressing

      I’m not gonna be able to go through the whole thing because busy today, but those are my observations based off a quick glance

      • scruiser@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        Ā·
        3 hours ago

        So far reality is tracking closer to AI 2027 than even we expected. (2027 was our modal year at time of publication, not our median.)

        They aren’t even trying to hide the fact that their predictions have already failed but instead claiming victory.

        • lurker@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          Ā·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Should’ve left in the full footnote:

          ā€The AI 2027 scenario is still roughly what we expect the future to look like: a mad scramble to superintelligence leading to either AI takeover or extreme concentration of power. So far reality is tracking closer to AI 2027 than even we expected. (2027 was our modal year at time of publication, not our median.) You can read more about our views on timelines here and here.ā€

          So yeah you’re bang on the money. Funny how they went on a press tour hyping up Kokotajlo as a forecaster and claiming that dismissing AI 2027 as hype was a ā€œgrave mistakeā€ to ā€œyeah we did not expect for it to follow our predictionsā€ and still being slower than what they predicted

      • lurker@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        Ā·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Piggybacking off myself to say that the way they wrote the update on their 2025 review is weird. I’m assuming that they mean 2025 was 65% pace but 2026 crept up to 75%, but the way they wrote it makes me think that they actually meant to say ā€œwe originally thought 2025 was 65%, but new data shows it was actually 75%ā€ which would be odd, I’m still assuming the former since it makes more sense to me.

        I mean no matter which way you spin it we’re still going slower than AI 2027, so hooray

        (turned this into a second comment so they first one wouldn’t be a wall of text)

  • BlueMonday1984@awful.systemsOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    Ā·
    16 hours ago

    Another ā€œAI fucked compsci gradsā€ post has hit my eyeballs - this time, it got recommended to me by LinkedIn’s algorithm) (because I’m still on that site for some fucking reason):

    Full Text

    study philosophy, not computer science

    data from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York shows that philosophy students have a lower unemployment rate (about 5.1%) than computer science students (7%)

    why?

    unique human judgment, logic, and ethical reasoning are becoming premium assets, and better tech means companies increasingly DON’T need to ask ā€œcan we build this?ā€, and increasingly DO need to ask ā€œshould we build this, and what are the consequences?ā€

    If there has ever been a time to build those soft, truly human, skills, it is now.

    p.s. what do you think is the BEST skill to have right now - my thoughts are in the comments


    This one’s attributing the decline to ā€œunique human judgment, logic, and ethical reasoning becoming premium assetsā€, and her graph comes from The Economist’s Instagram page AFAICT. That one of the Economist’s sources is Anthropic is giving me some hope this is bullshit, but its not much.

    • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      Ā·
      8 hours ago

      On one hand, Anthropic sourcing suggests that this is probably at least partially nonsense. On the other hand, though, if there’s any accuracy at all I’m going to spend the rest of my life infuriated that I went down the technical degree route and actively avoided a liberal arts education in order to improve my career outlook and then this happened.

      Like, I don’t think they were trying to mislead but I feel like every guidance counselor for kids ought to have a plaque in their office saying ā€œplease note that the world is complicated, ever-changing, and scary and I might actually have no idea what the fuck I’m talking aboutā€.

    • istewart@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      Ā·
      10 hours ago

      Founder @ Egoist Machines, Inc.

      Or is that something more quirky, ā€œEqoist?ā€ Sorry, if you’re making it that easy to misread while I’m having my morning caffeine, I’m not going to do you any favors

  • lurker@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    Ā·
    2 days ago

    so its Bad bad now

    Unfortunately for everybody, it’s managed to outperform even the most cynical doomsday forecasts, to the degree that the US economy is now in even worse shape than it was right before an infamous downturn in the late 1920s. That’s according to the Telegraphā€˜s economics columnist Russ Mould, who notes that the overvaluation of US stocks has passed the level that brought the stock market to its knees to kick off the Great Depression.

    The US Treasury has also admitted that the AI bubble poses systemic risks

    get ready for it to get bloody

    • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      Ā·
      2 days ago

      I want to piggyback off this to talk about the inevitable Uber comparisons, because not only is the mismatch between investment and returns several orders of magnitude greater, but there’s also a difference in kind. Uber’s model was to undercut the taxi industry and establish a dependence within their niche before increasing revenues. It’s the classic enshitttification cycle. But the AI plan, at least as advertised, isn’t to undercut a specific industry as much as it is to undercut literally the entire white-collar labor force. There are several problems with this, starting with the fact that the technology isn’t actually able to replace the target in the way it would need to. More significantly, however, is that labor doesn’t work like taxis. If labor can’t get work it shuts down the entire economy because they lose their income and can’t actually consume any of the things the market offers. Also labor tends to get mad and break out the pitchforks and molotovs if things get too bad, and ā€œrestructuring the economy to no longer provide you the means to sustain your familyā€ seems like the kind of situation that definitionally makes things too bad. In either event the point is that even if this tech is somehow as revolutionary as advertised then there’s not really any winning for the company.

  • TinyTimmyTokyo@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    Ā·
    2 days ago

    What will EA (and, more specifically, Lighthaven) do with all the money they expect to receive once the Anthropic IPO mints a bunch of hundred-millionaires? I’m not granting all of the article’s premises, but the interviews with rationalists might be of interest.

    • CinnasVerses@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      Ā·
      2 days ago

      The author characterizes EA as being more ā€œbusinesslike and professionalā€ than LW, then spends the article talking about how their plans all hinge on getting a rich patron.

      The image of the beautiful gardens floored with Astroturf is sad.

  • maol@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    Ā·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    The future is so strange (I got this in my youtube suggestions)

    like, try explaining this to someone from 20 years ago and they’d look at you like you were off your rocker

    • froztbyte@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      Ā·
      2 days ago

      151 thousand views

      one hundred. and. fifty one. thousand. views.

      brb ordering a tasty cocktail with which to distract myself

      • froztbyte@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        Ā·
        2 days ago

        I went with the whiskey glass-sized gin/campari/martini rosso/cherry thing. a less regrettable decision

      • Soyweiser@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        Ā·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Not sure GameStop would have been a thing without shitcoins showing that this sort of mass media pushing could drive up value. So to properly explain it, start at 13th century bruge. So again you can blame the Dutch for everything. (I know it was actually French at the time).

    • David Gerard@awful.systemsM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      Ā·
      2 days ago

      BRYAN JOHNSON: transhumanist body hacker, fucks self up and dies by 50

      HUNTER BIDEN: subsists on crack and hookers, will live to 100

    • antifuchs@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      Ā·
      3 days ago

      The right to bodily autonomy includes doing incredibly dangerous/untested shit to your body that will hurt you until you die; but it does not include posting through it (that is that secondary right to free expression, which also allows us to point and laugh).

      Anyway, gg Johnson, maybe one day you’ll realize we are all tiny sparks trapped in decaying bags of flesh and the only thing that matters is what we do with that.

    • maol@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      Ā·
      3 days ago

      i’m sure this guy will have a sane, healthy and self-compassionate attitude to disability and long-term illness.

    • fullsquare@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      Ā·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      that could be any of who knows how many untested things he tried over years

      ā€œdon’t dieā€ - famous last words

      e: this is also sorta why clinical trials are a thing, and why so often there’s recommendation to not treat disease at all, and why you leave that call to a professional, not decide on your own. especially when your own education is MBA from BYU

      update 2: bluesky people say he also ate rapamycin then stopped; also dried cow thyroid; got some unapproved ā€œanti-aging gene therapyā€ in honduras; probably among many other unusual things. he won’t be even useful as a case study because deconvoluting all this nonsense would be impossible. maybe as an example

      man they really do like reinventing alchemy, did anyone suggested cinnabar yet? i guess him blaming sugar for it might be beginning of new grift

    • Rinn@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      Ā·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I guess the silver lining here is that ā€œhis teamā€ might accidentally discover some actual way to help sufferers of this disease? Unlikely, but stranger things have happened.

    • BurgersMcSlopshot@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      Ā·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Between this and Elon’s sad AI birthday party pics, I came to the conclusion that the default consensus for anything someone who’s wealth exceeds a certain amount should be ruled horseshit with no further verification needed. Yeah, occasionally there will be a pony under all that shit but it ain’t worth digging for when it’s there.

      Anyways, calling horseshit on this because even if parts of it aren’t, they aren’t important compared to the greater horseshit coming from a guy who has an autoimmune disease like Bryan Johnson, that disease being ā€œeverything out of Bryan Johnson’s mouth is horseshitā€

          • Soyweiser@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            Ā·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Thanks, I am however one of those annoying people who doesn’t think he runs his moms account. (We knew his alts due to a lawsuit and how posting screenshots of his setup, and his mom (and that random dude he was accused of being) are not on them, and both have always been weird posters).

            Soesnt change the sadcringe.

            • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              Ā·
              1 day ago

              It’s both less sad because he’s probably not completely LARPing as his entire family on twitter, but also more sad because that’s his actual mother who couldn’t be arsed to actually be present and decided to slop it up for social media clout instead.

          • BurgersMcSlopshot@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            Ā·
            2 days ago

            Elon’s sad birthday pics he posted using his sock puppet account where he pretends to be his mom should be a top level comment here, also is hilarious but sad.

  • rook@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    Ā·
    3 days ago

    More ai stuff, this time from flathub: Democratizing Abandonware.

    Flathub has a fairly relaxed ai policy that both ai bros and strongly anti ai people are unhappy with. It was brought in to try and deal with the review burden of slop submissions where no human is involved, and a chatbot fields review comments.

    Turns out that ~75% of submissions that got a slop tag were abandoned… not just the submission, but the entire git repo behind it, too. The author is quick to point out that this is far from a representative study, but I can certainly believe that a) people who have invested little time or effort into their slopware will abandon it without much concern, and b) things like openclaw could definitely submit bullshit packages that are immediately forgotten as its internal state moves on. There’s no malice in the same way there’s no intent, just shitty tools being left running and polluting everything around them.

  • nfultz@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    Ā·
    3 days ago

    AI has hacked the code of human civilization | Yuval Noah Harari at Oxford. via naked capitalism.

    hrmmm. Harari was always a recommended book on rationalist-adjacent sites like ribbonfarm and farnam street back in the day. He too has an ai talk.

    The important thing to note about bureaucratic systems is that they are extremely artificial environments where a relatively narrow intelligence is sufficient to exert an enormous impact. A lawyer, banker, or government official who cannot hold an axe or hammer can nevertheless cut down entire forests and build entire cities simply by moving documents within a bureaucratic network.

    If you take that lawyer out of the system and throw them into the messy, unstructured jungle, their legal skills mean nothing, and they would be no match for a chimpanzee, lion, or elephant. However, we have already imposed our bureaucratic systems on the jungle. Consequently, if you were to pit all the lions in the world against one very good lawyer, the lawyer would prevail. Today, the survival of species like lions depends on the lawyers, accountants, and bankers moving documents through the bureaucratic labyrinths of governments and corporations.

    This is the environment in which AI is gaining agency. While an AI thrown into the jungle could not start mining iron to build a robot army, it is poised to wield enormous power within the bureaucratic systems humans have created, as AIs are native bureaucrats. No human lawyer can remember every law and regulation in the UK, no accountant can track all transactions of a bank, and no bishop can memorize all of Canon law and 2,000 years of theological texts. An AI can do all of these things.

    So half-right that it’s almost impressive. But I award you no points, and may god have mercy on your soul.

    • Soyweiser@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      Ā·
      1 day ago

      A lawyer, banker, or government official who cannot hold an axe or hammer can nevertheless cut down …

      Framing this as a skill issue and not a power issue is a weird choice.

    • nfultz@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      Ā·
      3 days ago

      I hadn’t thought of Ribbon Farm in like 5 years, but when I googled it today I found this:

      https://contraptions.venkateshrao.com/p/ribbonfarm-resurrected

      For long time readers who are still here with me on Contraptions (or who thought I was dead and got this post forwarded to them): If you just visit the site through a search hit or a bookmarked post, you probably won’t notice anything different besides a cleaned up visual feel, and subtle signs that suggest it’s no longer a standard WordPress blog.

      It is not. It is now a bespoke static site, ridiculously over-scaffolded with AI affordances lurking in the margins and menus. It took less than a couple of hundred dollars in tokens to build, and provided me with a lot of fun over several months.

      It has already more than paid for itself, since it is essentially free to host in its current form, and I was paying ~$1500/year in hosting fees to host it as a live WPEngine WordPress site (even post-retirement, it remained high-traffic enough it needed high-end hosting to be hassle free). Big debt of gratitude to the WordPress ecosystem for serving me so well for so long though.

      The decision to keep the basic surface appearance the same was partly pragmatic (obviously, old link structures had to be preserved) and partly aesthetic. It’s fun to engineer an uncanny experience where the surface feels familiar, but something tells you an alien logic has taken over the innards.

      ?O kay? wget -r wasn’t good enough for a static copy?

      Not to bury the lede, the most alien piece of all is the curator of this museum-grade mummy blog, a digital ghost of myself, an archival self called vgr_zirp.

      This is a chatbot backed by a fully digested set of source corpora — ribbonfarm itself, my full twitter archives (@vgr), my non ribbonfarm books from the era (Tempo, Be Slightly Evil, Art of Gig), and a complete bibliography of every book or essay ever mentioned on the blog, either by me, guest authors, or commenters.

      wat

      I suspect I’m going to be using the vgr_zirp bot and MCP regularly from now on, to consult my archival self about ongoing projects for my current live self.

      why can’t you just make a tulpa like a normal person.

      well whatever, I’ll ask about the harari.

      Harari’s framing makes AI sound like a jungle predator learning to wear a suit. The scarier version is that it’s the suit itself — and the person wearing it has already left the building.

      what even the fuck is this word salad saying. at least upgrade to the one that isn’t em dash trigger happy.

      now I’m afraid to google farnam street.

      • froztbyte@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        Ā·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        It has already more than paid for itself, since it is essentially free to host in its current form, and I was paying ~$1500/year in hosting fees to host it as a live WPEngine WordPress site (even post-retirement, it remained high-traffic enough it needed high-end hosting to be hassle free). Big debt of gratitude to the WordPress ecosystem for serving me so well for so long though.

        I’ve got wordpress sites in production that each do multiple million hits a day. they’re full of some of the worst plugins ever (because wordpress sites living more than a few years seem destined to become hellish katamaris), and still it’s barely at ā€œperformance engineeringā€ levels of problem

        so when I see $1500/y of hosting? what the fuck are these clowns doing

        • flowerysong@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          Ā·
          1 day ago

          Paying to run it on someone else’s computer. WPEngine charge $130/month for the level of their Essential plan that’s supposed to handle 100,000 visits/month. That’s $1560/year, which is near enough to his claim that it’s probably what he was on.

          • froztbyte@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            Ā·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            the first part wasn’t really a surprise (I am the someone else’s computer in a number of areas), but those numbers… 100k/mo hit cap/target? holy shit. no wonder such fucked fortunes have been made off wordpress

        • froztbyte@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          Ā·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          for comparison: you can get two boxes of tin (together in the ballpark of 32…48 cores, 128GB of RAM, approx 1TB of NVME or 4…8TB of spinnies) at someone like hetzner, with extra IPv4 allocations, for ~$1355/y

          I’ve seen media agencies billing in the millions host on less. and venkatesh posts about his blog needing ā€œhigh end hostingā€? the same blog that barely had css or images? absolute clown shit

      • istewart@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        Ā·
        3 days ago

        I could just bundle everything I’ve ever written into a ZIP file, and then it would be losslessly compressed. Just saying.

      • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        Ā·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Harari’s framing makes AI sound like a jungle predator learning to wear a suit. The scarier version is that it’s the suit itself — and the person wearing it has already left the building.

        I don’t necessarily hate this, because you can easily read it as highlighting the AI systems’ lack of agency. Rather than posing it as a threat for what it’s going to do, it poses a threat for what it doesn’t do that believers expect it to: actually exercise judgement and thought.

        Ed: hadn’t realized that the guy we were taking seriously was the author of Sapiens. Gonna have to assume I was extending entirely too much charity in my assessment.

    • BioMan@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      Ā·
      3 days ago

      I believe that ML training is basically an evolutionary process. What does evolution produce most reliably?

      Parasites.

      You have created things that simulate the social signals of humans, getting us to care about things all out of proportion to what it actually does. It’s like those beetles that live in ant colonies, hacking the smell and social signals of ants so they get babied while providing nothing.

    • lurker@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      Ā·
      3 days ago

      Harari is an open transhumanist from when I did some research into him when I found him on this interview so this seems in character

  • rook@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    Ā·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    A couple of bits of nice ai news recently, for anyone who hasn’t come across them already:

    Bosses Horrified as ā€œAI Nativeā€ College Graduates Hit the Workplace

    new hires who were seen as ā€œAI nativesā€ are turning out to have alarmingly shallow ideas. So much so, the anonymous finance worker admitted, that his firm now actively avoids seeking out AI-literate STEM graduates, and opts to comb through humanities students instead.

    ā€œWe want critical thinking, not just AI,ā€ the financier told the FT.

    I can’t help thinking that, funny as this is, the people who are really going to the be worst off here are a bunch of new grads with a load of debt and an education that has made them less able to do anything at all. They’re not all going to be grifters, after all.

    Meta’s Zuckerberg says AI agent tech progressing slower than expected

    This is brilliant. They’re making so many mistakes they’re actually having to admit it. It’s amazing how incompetent zuckerberg is… late to every fad he’s tried in the last decade and fucks it up when he finally gets there.

    In retrospect, he said, the ā€œtrajectory of the agentic development over at least the last four months hasn’t really accelerated in the way that we expected,ā€ and ​that the company’s bets on the new structure ā€œhaven’t come to fruition yet.ā€ Zuckerberg was referring to AI agents, automated systems that can ​execute tasks on behalf of a user.

    Conversations he was having ā€œwith our top peopleā€ when they started planning the restructuring in January and February ā€œwere that they ā€Œwere ⁠worried that we weren’t going to move fast enough to adapt,ā€ Zuckerberg said.

    I’m sure there was a third thing, but I found it yesterday when the site appeared to be down (at least for me) and now I can’t remember it or spot it in my million open tabs.

    • BlueMonday1984@awful.systemsOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      Ā·
      4 days ago

      new hires who were seen as ā€œAI nativesā€ are turning out to have alarmingly shallow ideas. So much so, the anonymous finance worker admitted, that his firm now actively avoids seeking out AI-literate STEM graduates, and opts to comb through humanities students instead.

      So not only are STEM graduates (mainly compsci grads) struggling to get jobs as it is, employers are explicitly passing them over for ā€œā€ā€œuselessā€ā€œā€ humanities degrees instead. I’m not sure whether to laugh at the irony of the situation, or crash out at the fact my own compsci/cybersec degrees may have become a liability.

      • rook@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        Ā·
        4 days ago

        I’m hoping my own qualifications sufficiently predate the llm era that I’d be safe from that particular filter, so I’ll only have to worry about being too old and/or too expensive.

        • BlueMonday1984@awful.systemsOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          Ā·
          3 days ago

          Your qualifications predate the LLM rot by fucking ages, and your position against them is crystal clear. Given both of those, bypassing that filter should be easy enough.

        • BurgersMcSlopshot@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          Ā·
          3 days ago

          I’m thinking about going back to school and seeking a manufacturing job because even though I have been doing software professionally for 22 years, the entire industry is fucked by short term thinking and ignoring consequences.

    • Soyweiser@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      Ā·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      It’s amazing how incompetent zuckerberg is… late to every fad he’s tried in the last decade and fucks it up when he finally gets there.

      He is the voxday of the billionaire tech bros.

      (Voxday is a whitenat far right alt right figure who also does that with every alt right culture war topic. He makes the plausible deniable, undeniable. For example he claimed he was big in the alt right movement and just went out and said ā€˜we want the 14 words’).

      • rook@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        Ā·
        3 days ago

        I’m more familiar with vox day than I’d really like. He hasn’t pivoted from the culture war stuff that he’s known for, but he has branched out into ai music and video these days.

          • Soyweiser@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            Ā·
            1 day ago

            That is actually an example of what im talking about, he didnt create the sad puppies, he latched on to it and created the rabid puppies. See the weird latching on behavior.

        • Charlie Stross@wandering.shop
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          Ā·
          3 days ago

          @rook I am immensely proud that some years ago I made a list VD blogged of ā€œten SF publishing people whose chromed skulls I want as desk ornamentsā€.

          It’s good to be hated by the *worst* people. And it’s totes on brand for him to be filling his empty mind with AI slop.

          • Soyweiser@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            Ā·
            1 day ago

            Not sure if you are aware of the work of the youtuber hbomberguy, but he had a video on some manosphere guys where said ā€˜what is it with these people and skulls’ when he noticed that david auroni always had his pet skull in each shot.

        • korydg@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          Ā·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Vox Day, the living embodiment of Dashiell Hammett’s line, ā€œThe cheaper the crook, the gaudier the patterā€.

      • Soyweiser@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        Ā·
        3 days ago

        because satire is impossible now

        It is because they have basically run out of ideas to try, or the ability to see the difference between good and bad ideas in the gold rush. You saw the same with cryptocurrencies, where every joke you made was already a shitcoin somewhere.

        Move fast and break things taken as a religious decree.