- cross-posted to:
- world@quokk.au
- worldnews@lemmy.ml
- cross-posted to:
- world@quokk.au
- worldnews@lemmy.ml
According to a senior official, from the US perspective, a takeover of Greenland by the United States is currently the only way to address the long-term security risks surrounding the island, which is part of the Kingdom of Denmark.
“We continue to believe that this is the best way to meet NATO’s defence requirements with regard to Greenland,” he told journalists yesterday ahead of the NATO summit in Ankara.
At the same time, he said that other options were also being examined. He did not specify what these might entail. The senior government official pointed out that there was “intense naval activity” in the region around Greenland and that US President Donald Trump was seeking a “permanent” solution.
“So far, we see the acquisition of Greenland by the United States as the only solution,” the official added.
An attack on Greenland is an attack on a founding member of NATO, since the island belongs to Denmark despite its autonomy. The U.S. won’t attack NATO. Why would it? Not even that orange pedo would be that unbelievably stupid.
This nonsense was already ridiculous the last time around. I don’t understand how anyone can take this seriously.
this post is not the best example, but people were saying the same thing when he kidnapped another countries leader or when he started a war
Yes, that’s true. But instigating a military conflict with its own allies would be quite self-destructive, even for this criminal regime, which is, after all, well known for making empty threats as well.
I can’t for the life of me imagine what the benefit would be for the billionaires who control the U.S.
Trump and his henchmen may be utterly unscrupulous and obviously not the brightest, but there is one constant: every decision they make serves to line their own pockets.
I simply cannot fathom what benefit this gang would gain from invading Greenland. What is absolutely certain, however, is that this would have disastrous consequences for trade between Europe and the U.S.
Europe would undoubtedly have to respond, and that would cost all parties involved billions uppon billions.
It may well be that Trump himself would accept that in his narcissistic self-interest or in an attempt to completely ruin the U.S. However, I consider it much more likely that this is just the usual bullshit, because that’s definitely part of his communication strategy: one scandal after another to distract from his actual, sinister schemes. He’s been quite successful at that so far.
You’re a fool if you don’t take everything this administration says seriously
Well, I think it’s more important to tune out the noise this regime is constantly making and pay attention to the things they keep quiet about.
Besides, what is Europe supposed to do? Station nuclear warheads in Greenland?
History is going to prove you wrong.
No problem at all. He would simply redefine the term ‘attack’ first. And on the next day, he would publish 2 more pages from the Epstein files, then nobody talks about Greenland anymore.
Because he can.
Source
If there were no straight up declaration of war by all NATO member states, the U.S. would lose its closest allies, and sanctions would be imposed that would cost everyone involved a great deal of money.
“Because he can” won’t be enough for the people who put Trump in the position he’s in.
Oh yes, I know that.