If you’re not familiar with the LEGO scandal, the tl;dw is that this YouTuber Reckless Ben (Ben Schneider) has been investigating a stolen set of LEGO worth ~$100-200k (depending on who you ask) and the local police dept and criminal justice system has been colluding with the criminals (all members of the local Mormon church) to get him to STFU. The long version is, very long. You can check his channel for more.

Previously the local police dept managed to get a warrant to raid Ben’s rental home with guns drawn and arrest him, based on what is clearly fabricated evidence. Here they appear to have done it again to get access to his Google account.

The linked video is mirrored on Peertube and timestamped to the relevant section.

Ben does also provide a copy of the subpoena in the video but I cannot vouch for its’ validity, and he has used placeholder evidence before, but that’s neither here nor there.

Anyway, the part that was relevant to this community was that in the course of their investigation they subpoenaed Google, and Google handed over basically his entire life to them. I’m sure this was very useful in their investigation.

I don’t necessarily blame Google here for complying with a subpoena, but the moral of the story is to stop giving Google your data, because everything you say and do can and will be used against you in a court of law, with or without legitimate justification, and the more stuff you give them, the more ammunition you’re providing the prosecutor.

This is also not exclusive to Google. Anything not local, self-hosted or encrypted a la Proton can be subpoenaed and the provider will have to comply. It just so happens that Google probably has more information about literally everyone in the world than any other particular entity.

  • sleepmode@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    34 seconds ago

    IIRC The Civil Rights Lawyer from Audit the Audit is helping him out. Shit is fucked if it has his attention. Hope it turns out ok.

  • minorkeys@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    45 minutes ago

    Never let yourself become dependent on something a company has control of, if at all possible. They will use it as leverage to coerce concessions from you that drive you further toward controlling nothing at all.

    We could all use a “Live without technology” day where everyone lives intentionally without using technology owned by others, learn first hand where those liabilities and leverage are in our lives, the cost of loss of access, and the alternatives. We are far more likely to accept enshitification of everything if a loss of access suddenly causes a crisis we’ve never encountered before. Awareness is a strength that would be wise to cultivate. If you can’t go one day without tech, you’re already told dependent and tbh, a threat to the community and people around you.

  • ljosalhusky@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Thank goodness we’re finally safe, everyone! I feel so incredibly safe I can barely sleep at night — partly from relief, partly from the faint red glow of the dashboard camera evaluating my facial expressions for signs of independent thought. Remember when driving was about getting somewhere? Now the car watches you, the road watches you, the toll booth photographs you, and somewhere an algorithm decides whether your blinker-to-lane-change ratio indicates sufficient loyalty to remain a licensed citizen. And those anti-distraction cameras! You’re no longer trusted to glance at a road sign without the system assuming you’re filming a TikTok. The camera knows. The camera always knows. And the camera, unlike you, never had a stressful Tuesday.

    I also adore the financial supervision. Every coffee I buy with my card is lovingly noted and stored in case someone - anyone - someday needs to review my caffeine patterns for national security purposes. Two espressos before 9 AM? Possible instability. Four beers Saturday? Risk factor. Thirteen emergency Toblerones during tax season? Irrefutable character assessment.

    My phone tracks my location so faithfully I couldn’t match its dedication if I tried. It knows I went to the pharmacy Thursday. It knows I took the scenic route Friday. It probably knows I stood outside the bakery six minutes deciding whether to treat myself and walked away empty-handed - proving to whichever algorithm monitors such things that I possess both self-discipline and poor decision-making skills simultaneously.

    Facial recognition cameras mean I no longer suffer the indignity of walking through a city anonymously like some 2003 peasant. I’m identified, timestamped, and filed - because a free citizen moving through public space unnoticed is clearly a missed opportunity for database enrichment.

    But here’s my absolute favorite part. All this magnificent safety infrastructure - every camera, every log, every database, every tracking system - it’s all in the hands of whoever happens to be in government this season. And governments change. Today’s well-meaning bureaucrat administering your data with careful oversight is tomorrow’s populist demagogue who noticed you donated to the wrong cause, attended the wrong protest, and Googled the wrong thing on a Tuesday afternoon. Maybe you were researching a school project. Maybe you were just curious. Doesn’t matter — the search history doesn’t care about context, and neither will they.

    And the beauty of the pitch? Nobody ever said “we’d like to watch everything you do forever.” They said “safety”. One word, carrying all the weight, answering all questions, and conveniently foreclosing further discussion. Safety from what? Don’t worry about it. Who controls it? Interesting. Can you influence it? Adorable that you’d ask. The safest person alive is someone in a padded cell under constant supervision. Magnificent safety record. Very low satisfaction. But completely safe - until the warden changes.

  • SleeplessCityLights@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 hours ago

    For a series of incidents that have gathered international attention, it interesting to see the police and legal system double down on corruption. It like internationally advertising how crooked the cops are and how corrupt the legal system is to everyone. Do you want tourists to never visit? Because that is how you get tourists to not visit.

      • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Most people are still ‘nothing to hide nothing to fear’ and I know some people close to me that insist that ICE and Trump are only going after the worst of the worst.

        • The D Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          56 minutes ago

          the people who understand what’s going on have figured out that what the regime means is “brown people are, as a group, the worst of the worst.” the people who don’t understand that are more vulnerable to believe that the face value is the truth

  • Reborn_Mormon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Oh, is this what’s going to happen to me in my support of the Mormon Church by forming the cult of Mormon Occultism? Whatever. I expected this twelve years ago when the CIA contacted me, covertly, on an acid trip. Hard to explain, but I have, thoroughly, in my book. But the goal of my mission now is truthtelling, and somehow I knew there would be a lengthy legal battle with “a church” in my future during my fateful acid trip where aliens revealed themselves to me. Hard to explain, but I portray it poorly deliberately because that helps the dazzle camouflage. We know what we’re doing. But, I had an experience with the Mormon Church. God, who is that organization of three letters that’s always watching, told me to keep on keeping on. Staying silent while screaming. Has anyone ever tested you were a pedophile? It’s weird what the Mormon Church prophets from. I’m a master baiter. I’m a fisher of men, I said. I’m a cop, I said in my last post, but the silent don’t even read this far.

      • Reborn_Mormon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Go, go gabba gotcha!

        Man, all I want is to non-sexually explain my strangeness in development, that the average prude would assume is sexual by default. I lost my “mom” five times, alright? I’m a little weird. Can I talk about this stuff to heal skillfully? Asking the gods here…

  • FoxAlive@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    If someone out there still thought the cops was the good guys, this is mainstream enough that its going to open some eyes to the belief that all cops are bad cops.

    We’ve been saying how corrupt police are and how they are like a gang that sticks up for themselves first and foremost. Now the youth get to experience that second hand in a way that the public can’t confuse them about race issues or anything dumb.

  • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    13 hours ago

    What was the value of the Lego collection in this scandal? 200k? It’s wild just how far people are willing to go over what’s ultimately not even enough money to retire off of, and only a couple of years’ living expenses in some cities

    • artyom@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Sounds like they’ve been successfully getting away with this sort of thing for a long time. So in the long run, probably way more money.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I mean, Proton has a long history of quietly complying with subpoenas

      I think Hetzner+Tailscale+Nextcloud might be a better solution

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Not email, storage, nextcloud. If they requested my emails for anything, they’d be horrified how boring they’d be. it’s literally just spam

      • Cornballer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Proton doesn’t have anything to hand over except maybe an ip and billing info. That’s why design matters.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          What makes you think a court can’t order them to modify the site/client to capture your key and send it home?

          • Preston Maness ☭@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            What makes you think a court can’t order them to modify the site/client to capture your key and send it home?

            There’s already precedent for this. The FBI leaned on Lavabit to serve compromised code to Edward Snowden. Lavabit closed up shop instead.

            Can read more here, which makes the case that “web-based cryptography is always snake oil”: https://www.devever.net/~hl/webcrypto

            • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              40 minutes ago

              I’m pretty sure proton has already gone on record stating that if a court ordered them to start keeping logs for a specific account then they have to comply.

            • rumba@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Lavabit closed up shop instead.

              Surely proton would do the same… /s

              You can’t trust a corporation to keep your data secure. They can hide it from your ISP at best.

              Crypt your stuff with your own keys and store it in places where you own the client. Convenient security is rarely secure

  • mcv@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    The lesson here is not to trust Google or other non-encrypted storage with your stuff. There are email providers that are more protective of your stuff, but more than that: don’t store everything in one place. That way if one account is compromised, not everything is exposed. And American companies are more likely to share your data than European ones.

    • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I live here, and yes, it’s corrupt.

      It has been for at least 50 years, now most of all. It’s not as blatant as some countries re open bribery, but our “news” sources have been owned by the bourgeoisie since at least the 90s, every year they bought up more and more smaller, local news sources; now only a few remain, all firmly under control.

      Abuses of power are rampant, just not reported often. So we have more room for Kanye coverage, two-page spread

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Just as an fyi, if you’d self hosted your services, they would probably subpoena you, and you would be obligated to give them all your data from your own server, and if you’d refus, your be in deep, deep shit

    It doesn’t matter where you store data, if it’s stored, it can be used

    • DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      “Well boys I sure hope you can get in to this because I lost the password ages ago I remember it was a set of 15 random words with capitals in random spots but just can’t remember the order…”

      Then your lawyer gets to tell the jury that you complied.

    • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      And that’s where good encryption comes into play. At least in the US, (where this case is happening), they can compel you to turn over the encrypted data blob. But they can’t compel you to give them the password to access the data. Because forcing you to give up the password would violate your 5th amendment right to remain silent.

      Also, they probably wouldn’t subpoena you and give you a chance to respond; they would just bust your front door down and take your server. You wouldn’t have an opportunity to peacefully turn the data over to them. Only the wealthy get subpoenas. The rest of us get no-knock search warrants, dead pets, (because cops will shoot any dogs that are present when they execute the warrant), and traumatized/injured/killed family members who happened to be home at the time.

    • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      How so? You cannot be forced to accuse yourself. If your self-hosted data is on encrypted hard drives then they can’t do anything about it.

      Except in the UK where you can be forced to provide decryption keys.

    • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      You’re half right, in that ultimately they can compel you to hand over your data, but there is a higher bar to clear for them to get your personal data stored locally.

      For one, they can’t compel you to turn over your data with a subpoena, they’d have to actually go in front of a judge and get a warrant.

          • chortle_tortle@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            It would at least be harder, and have real constitutional ramifications.

            Not really that much harder. From Harvard Law Review

            We found that 93.56% of warrant affidavits areapproved on their initial submission, and only 6.44% are denied (ignoring those submissions that are withdrawn before a decision is made). And once we account for the ability to resubmit affidavits, the eventual approval rate reaches 98.14%.

    • TwistedTurtle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      I imagine it’d still be preferable to make them go through you and your lawyer for that info, where you could still have some measure of control.

    • shrek_is_love@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think the real takeaway is to not put all your eggs in one basket, so they would need separate subpoenas.

      Getting access to just his Google Account could contain Google Voice text messages, voicemails, and call history. Google search history, Google Maps location history, everything in Google Docs, Gmail, YouTube, and probably other stuff I’m forgetting. That’s all with a single subpoena, which includes a lot of things irrelevant to the case.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Google doesn’t store map data anymore. It is all local.

        • recursivethinking@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          That’s just map data. Your travel/location data is still stored acvount-side unless you disable history in acct settings.

          Edit: 2 settings, “Timeline” and “Maps History”.

          Timeline is a “feature” that tracks where you’ve been.

    • renrenPDX@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      They’ll just come in and take ALL your PC/server hardware and hold it as evidence. Preferably with a warrant, but if they “fear” that you may destroy evidence, they can seize everything regardless of warrant. If you’re legally ordered to decrypt and refuse to do so, you’ll be held in contempt of court and probably jailed/fined for who knows how long.

  • AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    So is the youtuber the one who got his lego stolen? Or is he just a journalist reporting on this story?

    • historicaldocuments@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Apart from what everyone else here has said LegalEagle did some videos on this, and the big takeaway was that everybody needed to get a lawyer ASAP instead of trying to plead their case in the court of public opinion via podcast/youtube videos/whatever. Reckless Ben got the audio from his court case and used it to make a youtube video (he was representing himself). This whole thing went from ordinary mess to Great Big Mess with no signs of anyone trying to dial it down.

      It think this is the one depending on how far the rabbit hole you want to go down:

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Ed Mansell consigned a massive LEGO Star Wars collection to the Salem Bricks & Minifigs store in 2023; payments later stopped and inventory allegedly vanished.

      The franchise collapsed in 2024, new owners took over, and both sides disputed whether the LEGO sets were still in the store.

      Bryan Mansell sought help, leading YouTuber Reckless Ben to investigate, confront BAM Corporate, and release viral videos in 2026.

      Chaos followed: arrests, leaked police footage, conspiracy theories, and over $500k raised for Bryan.

      The Gormans sued BAM Corporate; BAM Corporate filed a TRO, gag order, and a federal RICO lawsuit against Reckless Ben and others. That legal action against Ben was an egregious overreach. Couldn’t post anything, talk about anything to go huge distances from any BAM store in existence. RICO lawsuit is like what you charge mobsters with.

      The case moved to federal court in June 2026, with multiple civil and criminal proceedings still ongoing.

    • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Ben is a YouTube entertainer that found out about this situation. He’s more activist than journalist. I think the original owner sold the collection to Ben.

      • Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        23 hours ago

        The original owner didn’t sell it to anyone. It was on consignment with Bricks n Minifigs. Hence the whole issue to begin with.

          • TastySoup@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Clarifying for the curious because it’s been a whole saga: Original owner (Brian) of the legos did consignment deal with BAM, and it was going well til new owners took over, but when it went sour with new owners Ben got involved.

            During one of their many creative attempts to resolve the matter, they decided to have Brian “sell” the legos to Ben and some of his friends (I think it was 10k worth of legos each because that was the threshold for small claims court.)

            So yea, there was a “sale” as part of the trying to recover them process, and yea, the original consignment deal with BAM is what started the whole ordeal.

  • Meatwagon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ve been following this and he keeps making so many mistakes. Stop talking to the police, bro. Stop trying to get the shop owner on camera.

    File lawsuits against the company (I know he tried and the cop refused to issue the summons illegally, so you do it again after filing a complaint against the police), and file every lawsuit possible outside of that district.

    But that’s not good views for YouTube. He just keeps giving them more ammunition to go after him.

      • Nangijala@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I genuinely think this guy was born without fear. Like it simply doesn’t function in his brain. The more into his past you dig, the more you realize that him calling himself Reckless Ben is not a joke. We are all lucky that he is using his fearlessness for good. To him, this entire thing is just an interesting experience or however he phrased it. I can’t help, but admire him.

    • Folstar@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      In the above video, his decision to attend a protest wearing a beard is beyond dubious. I sure hope he had several independent lawyers weigh in on exactly what he could say and do that won’t violate the court order, because on the surface that seems like begging the judge to throw him in jail. Even if he technically followed the order, the appearance of it is probably enough for the judge to go nuclear.

      Most everything leading up to that I could write off as a combination of telling a good story, boundary testing, and shining a light on how absurdly corrupt our criminal Justice System is in operation, but that beard scene has me concerned that Ben just lost whatever ground he had to stand on.

    • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Lawsuits do no good when they are invisible. He’s exposed insane police and judge corruption that would be swept under the rug becuase of no exposure. If utah decides they dont like you or me, we would be fucked, in jail for made up lies, becuase we dont have millions of people watching.

    • cunnililgus@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      After he got forcibly muted by court I believe he finally spoke to lawyers and then he won pretty quick.

      I suspect he was playing 4D chess, and decided to show what your chances are in the system if you play it by the book and alone, which most people who can’t afford a lawyer would do, and what also the thieves relied on. They told the victim directly try to sue us and you’ll end up paying more in lawyer costs.