• barsoap@lemm.eeBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Let’s flip this around: Show me a thing that Meta has touched that hasn’t turned to shit. Why risk the same fate when we don’t have to? What is meta bringing to the table that would warrant foolhardiness on our part?

    See the opposite of FUD is naivete, hubris, make-believe, not something one wants to be engaged in either.

      • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 years ago

        speaks volumes that a rythm game was the only example we could come up with from a company that has literally billions at its disposal lol

        • atocci@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          It was just the first thing that came to mind, but I know they also contribute to / fund the Blender Foundation.

              • barsoap@lemm.eeBanned from community
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                WTH would they develop cycles it’s not like they’re making movies or such. Or really anything that’s not interactive. But yes meta does a lot of open source work in general. Probably should’ve specified “a product they make money with”.

                Hmmm page 95 values the EPIC megagrant at 87,540 yet they’re in the corporate patron tier, should be platinum.

                • atocci@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Don’t forget this report is for 2022, not 2023. The grant for 2023 might be closer to the 2021 level since they’re back in patron tier. I can only speculate on what their interests in Cycles is, but maybe they use Blender for making ads and such.

                  I’m sure their open source contributions aren’t out of charity though. They’re getting a return on their investment somehow, even if only in the things they use the projects for. I think the open source work would be a better comparison for their ActivityPub integration either way though.

      • masterspace@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        Honestly, lots of PC gaming fans are unhappy with Oculus focusing on the broad consumer market, but the Q2/Q3 are genuinely impressive pieces of hardware/software and are the first devices to actually meaningfully push VR even somewhat into the mainstream.

    • masterspace@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Huh, if only there was an example of Meta existing on a decentralized platform where I could choose to visit them and interact with their stuff but I didn’t have to.

      Oh huh, would you look at that, turns out this little decentralized network called the worldwide web has been running it this whole time!