• Cruxifux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    372
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    How disappointed we will all be when all the boomers are dead and it doesn’t solve any of our problems.

    • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      115
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      We’ll just have to see, won’t we?

      Plus, it’s not like the climate will just snap back into place when the boomers are finally too old for their skeleton talons to cling to power. That shit is going to take generations of sacrifice to roll back, if it doesn’t topple civilization first.

      https://www.noaa.gov/news-release/warmest-arctic-summer-on-record-is-evidence-of-accelerating-climate-change

      The whole ethos of the majority of baby boomers seems to have been to raze the forest they got to enjoy behind them (as opposed to planting trees whose shade they’d never sit in like most generations aspire to), and they seem to be having remarkable success in that.

        • Rookwood@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The wealthy are savvy but with the boomers gone they lose a lot of their support. Of course they will try to maintain the status quo, but the people will be affected by the material conditions and see the truth. The only thing we have to fear is hate, but MTG, Boebart and Desantis were all elected by Boomers. Young people don’t vote for those idiots. I’m more concerned about Andrew Tate.

        • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This isn’t new though, many boomers were the hippies at one point, they had the photocopier, fairness doctrine TV & Radio and liberal attitudes for sex, gender, and civil rights.

          But the same tactics were used to stop and convert many of them, plus around half of them were the same sort of assholes that give them a bad name now.

        • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The results speak for themselves. The majority of their generation’s attitudes about the results indicate satisfaction with the results.

    • SomeGuy69@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The issues they left behind will last for generations. Funny that anyone could believe this goes away in our lifetime.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Or that we won’t make new problems that we get to blame on new generations. It will never end

    • Deceptichum@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s not about a magic cure that’ll fix everything over night.

      It’s about repairing decades of harm done by a generational mindset that valued wealth acquisition and material possession above every other facet of society. We won’t fix that trauma in one, two, or three generations but it will get better and better with time and distance to boomerism.

      • hightrix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The values of wealth accumulation and materialism are not at all limited to or even expressed mostly strongly by the Baby Boomer generation.

        The line of thinking that capitalism dies with boomers or that Gen X, Millennials, Gen Z, or whatever comes next will not fully embrace capitalism and will move towards socialism or some other non-competitive society seems pretty naive.

        Humans are a competitive species. Most people want to win. I doubt this mindset dies with boomers.

        • Deceptichum@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Humans are a co-operative species, same goes for our ape and monkey cousins.

          It is this instinctual nature of working together that enabled us to take down bigger prey, settle new lands, and become the dominant species on the planet.

          • hightrix@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t disagree. That said, would suggest that externally we are cooperative, but internally we are competitive. Even in ape families, there exists a hierarchy generally ruled by the biggest, strongest male.

            Which brings us back to the point at hand. Will humans come together to solve climate change? Or will humans continue to try to win at all costs?

            I can see either as a possibility. But I don’t see boomers dying as a catalyst.

        • Rookwood@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The rich are very concerned about the fact that all statistical evidence pointing to younger generations being starkly more socially minded than boomers. Don’t forget that Millennials have lived through a major economic crisis. Just like the Great Depression, that generally makes people realize that Capitalism is bullshit.

          The wealthy are funding massive propaganda campaigns as a result. They are unfortunately making some in roads with young men. But overall I don’t think it will be enough.

          • hightrix@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Don’t forget that Millennials have lived through a major economic crisis.

            Yes, yes we have.

            I’ll be very interested to see how the younger generations age. Anecdotally, I’ve witnessed numerous people go from progressive socialists, to centrist capitalists as they age. Not saying that will continue, only saying this as I’ve seen similar studies that show younger people are more progressive than older folks every 5 years for the past 3 decades. It’s not a terribly new concept, and I’m hopeful that it remains true.

        • progbob@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I agree! A change of the mindset is generational change at best. In many cases flawed ideologies and poor educational standards are just beeing continued. Yet I want to be one of the naive and think that there will be a new way of thinking and noticeable political change. For the better or the worse…, who knows?!

    • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      The next most conservative generation is Gen X. All few dozen of us. Expect those with power to retain it with massive use of wealth to constrain the rules of democracy, rather than numbers of voters.

    • Rookwood@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      It will solve the problem of their voting habits. They have lead us down this insane path because they are a narcissistic generation. Things won’t be perfect, but we might, just might, start turning things around. If we still can.

    • Vespair@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because that’s how it works, right? When your house is flooded because of a burst pipe, when you replace the pipe then your house is magically unflooded right? I mean of course no reasonable person thinks that, but that seems to be the understanding you’re suggesting. Meanwhile you’re trying to say that if we do repair the pipe and the house is still flooded, rightly acknowledging that the pipe is 100% the cause of the flood is somehow… wrong?

      The facts are that boomers fucked the world up, heavily, and did everything they could to hold onto power and rob the next generation (at least) of their deserved place in the driver’s seat of society, and cleaning up the messes and lessons left over by the boomers will take generations to clean up. The fact that boomer built long-term systemic problem without simple solutions does not mean that the boomers are not entirely at fault or that we aren’t entirely better off without them.

    • Hux@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I dunno, I feel like if I lived through the Black Death and I was there when—at the end of the suffering, surrounded by death—the last plague rat died, I’d take it as a win…

    • willis936@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re smart to balance their checkbooks on the way out. They never let any opportunity to consume go to waste.

    • vvvvan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And they’re not done yet! It’s also a shame they’ll probably waste the money they’ve accumulated on the worst possible things and people on the way out (fueling the dumpster fire).

  • Swasey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 year ago

    Interesting to look at, numbers wise… but it makes me think of the time I have left with my parents. I’m calling them tomorrow!

  • sleepmode@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    The problem isnt going to end with them. My right wing friends are completely indoctrinated by their boomer parents. And getting louder and louder about it.

    • in4aPenny@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’ll be outnumbered after the boomers are gone. They’ll either have to adapt, hide back in the shadows, or go full extremist.

      • sleepmode@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Here’s to hoping. It’s exhausting. I can’t have a single conversation without them slyly trying to slip in some earworm or go off on a tirade unexpectedly because I inadvertently trigger them.

        • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Here’s to hoping. It’s exhausting. I can’t have a single conversation without them slyly trying to slip in some earworm or go off on a tirade unexpectedly because I inadvertently trigger them.

          It’s worth the effort though. Thank you, citizen, for taking the time to do so.

  • Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just How stupid does one have to be to think all their woes exist with only one generation? There are far bigger monsters alive today in current younger generations (many in millennial) that are far more destructive to our lives and the earth. They’ve seen more $$$ than any boomer and will laugh at you while you live out of a garbage can.

    And you’d still probably be posting stupid memes like this acting completely oblivious to the burning hell around you.

            • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Then you’ll be the one getting called the leader of two evils

              It’s the violence inherited in the system. (And yes, that’s a Gen-X timeframe related quote (in a deep meta ironic sort of way)).

              AKA, what goes around, comes around.

              But still, it’s worth doing. Better to solve your own problems, versus waiting for somebody else to solve them for you.

        • PlainSimpleGarak@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Or write in someone you believe would actually be good at the job. Then you don’t have to vote for someone you believe to be unqualified.

            • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              …as long as choice #3 isn’t apocalyptically bad, right?

              Right?

              That’s only true if everyone believes that, a self-fulfilling prophecy.

              Would really be fantastic to see just once, one time, everyone interconnects on social media and agrees to vote on a third party, as an experiment if nothing else, to finally prove/disprove that theory.

              Funny enough these newer generations have this communicative interconnectivity of the Internet available to them, that previous generations didn’t have, but they don’t seem to use it, instead they just share mene pics/vids, etc.

              Could you imagine the political earthquake though if a third party actually won? Would be glorious to see.

              • Zink@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                The problem there isn’t that we (assuming the US) don’t want third parties, it’s that our voting system encourages party consolidation rather than cooperation. That only gets more true the higher in the government you go.

                • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  The problem there isn’t that we (assuming the US) don’t want third parties,

                  That’s not true. People don’t vote for third party because of the self-fulfilling prophecy, but it doesn’t mean they don’t want it. They also want ranked-choice voting.

                  I would advocate to put that self-fulfilling prophecy to the test, even if just as an experiment one time.

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re framing your indignation from a place of generality. No one thinks that boomers are the sole source of the World’s woes. However, they are the largest generation and tend to dominate discussions surrounding housing and the economy. They also make up a huge portion of the elected officials in North America, and younger generations have had it much harder than boomers ever did. It’s a lie that millennials and gen z have had more money than our parents and grandparents ever did. We don’t have nearly the purchasing power people did in the 50s and 60s.

  • IHeartBadCode@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    I find this insanely interesting. I hope someone does this for us Xers but I have a feeling that everyone will forget about us.

    And with this, I’m also interested in the rate of change here. Are boomers dying faster, slower, steady rate?

  • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I love how many people are going on about how one generation isn’t the cause of all our problems. I agree. Neither the post nor the website say anything good nor bad about any generation, just that it’s -mildly interesting- that boomers just hit 1/3 dead.

      • dumpsterlid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No other age cohort has been responsible for caring for the earth for the time they were adults and done such a horrific job. In the US, the cherry on top is also that this generation kicked everything their parents generation fought for into the dirt, including most of the social safety net, because of a bunch of dumb conservative rhetoric.

        I think it is pretty just as far as generalizations go, though of course it is a generalization.

        • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It must be weird judging a whole generation based only on what you know from learning about via social media.

          • dumpsterlid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Wait, why do you consider learning about things initially through social media a bad thing?

            Sure there is a ton of nonsense and outright lies out there, but social media is also unarguably a massive source of education for people on a dizzying array of topics. Look at how silly but genuine ADHD tiktok or instagram accounts have massively raised awareness about ADHD for the better as only one example. Look at /r/ADHD as a huge source of good information and discussion for people with ADHD as another. The existence of social media has irrevocably raised the voices of the oppressed in a way TV and newspapers aren’t really interested in doing except for the odd anomaly that gets through the filter of the rich.

            sigh whatever…

            • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Wait, why do you consider learning about things initially through social media a bad thing?

              Sure there is a ton of nonsense and outright lies out there

              You answered your own question.

              For the record, I’m distinguishing between “Social Media” and “the Internet”. The former is for entertainment, and the latter is for learning/knowledge.

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No other arbitrary age cohort has been so unjustly hated in American history

        You talking about Boomers, or Gen-Xers?

    • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      mildly interesting- that boomers just hit 1/3 dead.

      I do wonder about the accuracy of that though. It’s not like the website owner went through every death certificate ASAIK.

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s how statistics work. You take a sample and abstract it to the population. If you required every one to be checked, then no numbers of any sort would be made up because that’s too much work.

        • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s how statistics work. You take a sample and abstract it to the population. If you required every one to be checked, then no numbers of any sort would be made up because that’s too much work.

          Yeah sure, I’m aware of how statistics work. I’m just not confident that they are interpreting the statistics correctly.

    • Kiosade@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just checked, wow he’s technically a Boomer! Born in 1964, so just made it.

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just checked, wow he’s technically a Boomer! Born in 1964, so just made it.

        The identifier should be started at the age you entered society, and not the age you came out of your mother’s womb.

          • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You can infer the age you entered society from the age you left the womb.

            That doesn’t work. Technically I’m a Boomer, but I act and think completely like a Gen-Xer.

            In fact growing up I used to give Boomers crap myself, until I got more wise. They acted completely different from me, based on the times they grew up in.

        • Kiosade@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t understand, are you confused at the age range for Boomers? It literally says it in the image…

            • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes. Didn’t notice those dates. Still makes no sense if you take the name literally though…

              You’re wrong chronologically, but you’re right based on how those labels are used to judge people’s social values.

                • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  So it takes 20 years for a sexed up WW2 vet to hop in the sack after returning from the war?

                  Fuck if I know, that’s not what I’m speaking about.

                  You don’t pop out of your mother’s womb already programmed to have an understanding of the socieity that you live in. You learn as you go from external sources (parents, family, society) and you act a certain way at each milestone of your life (child, young teenager, older teenager, young adult, adult, middle aged, senior).

                  When we all judge someone by applying a generation label its done based on how they act/opine, and not the chronological date that they entered the World. There’s a lag/delay from when a person starts to exist on this Earth to the time they form a personality and express said personality.

          • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I don’t understand, are you confused at the age range for Boomers? It literally says it in the image…

            I get where they’re coming from.

            The starting point is normally defined at the time you came out of your mother’s womb, but it really shouldn’t be.

            It should be started at the point where you first enter society as a child, and start learning your generation’s societal values.

            Basically, when you started kindergarten, or Elementary School.

        • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          The generally accepted window for Baby Boomers, despite horny soldiers being home from WW2 for many years after 1945, is the window written in the post.

  • ramenshaman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not long ago I found out that my dad is too old to be a boomer. Apparently it’s called “the silent generation”.

    • FarFarAway@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The real question is if your grandma, on the other side, is from the same generation as your dad. Then shit gets weird.

  • Chev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is this like a timer for when we can start fighting climate change?

  • EmergMemeHologram@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Putting Keanu next to dead Boomers is like when Micheal Scott announced he hit Meredith and the doctors did all they could.

    Why would you phrase it like that?!

  • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a start.

    I kid, I kid, my parents are already dead, not everyone who was/is a boomer is horrid. But this generation has hung around power for too long, it’s time to move on.

  • TheWoozy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Boomers were hated by their elders for being too liberal and hated by their youngers for being to conservative.

    • Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Boomers were hated by their elders for being too liberal and hated by their youngers for being to conservative.

      Boomers People were hated by their elders for being too liberal and hated by their youngers for being to conservative. Since, like, forever.

      Fixed this for you.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      They got more conservative as they got older. All those hippie kids who protested Vietnam and experimented with drugs and sex ended up voting for Reagan.

      • GiantRobotTRex@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        People seem to have this view that everyone in the '60s was a hippie but that’s just not true. Time Magazine put the number around 300,000. In a country of 200 million, that’s only 0.15% of the population. They were a counterculture not mainstream culture. The vast majority of kids did not become hippies, and many actively hated the hippies.

          • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            A hell of a lot more than 300,000 people experimented with drugs and protested Vietnam.

            True, but not all of them were hippies.

            A lot of regular people, especially the younger generation, were doing drugs and protesting Vietnam.

            Those two things are not what makes a hippie a hippie. It’s their life view that does.

        • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          People seem to have this view that everyone in the '60s was a hippie but that’s just not true.

          '60s, maybe not, but 70s? There was a lot more of them then.

          But yeah, not everyone was.

      • Sirico@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Are you saying they took what they wanted, then pulled the ladder up after them?

          • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It sure seems like they feel that way about social security.

            We paid into it, we should be able to get the benefits from it, just like any other American in any other generation.

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        All those hippie kids who protested Vietnam and experimented with drugs and sex ended up voting for Reagan.

        No, we didn’t. Also, inflation and Iranian hostage situation.