If I hear “unalive” as a verb one more time dean-frown

  • BeamBrain [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    152
    ·
    1 year ago

    Something dystopian about being trapped in a system that runs on mass death but expects you to talk about death like you’re a character in a children’s cartoon

  • Gay_Wrath [fae/faer]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    1 year ago

    Tiktok isn’t an app for kids, i don’t want to be ageist - it’s for all ages and everyone can have fun on there. But the way tiktoker’s talk on tiktok and other platforms with their cutesy little euphemisms for violence and sex does make me think every time “Ah, they’re used to the kiddie app”, because it’s making grown adults be afraid to talk about adult topics.

    This is just the fault of censorship and not the app or the users, but it is literally sanitized kiddie language and feels very out of place and hard to take seriously on websites that don’t have that censorship.

      • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        1 year ago

        The filters and algos and censorship rules are not public. All this shit “unalived” 'grippy socks vacation", is people trying to intuit what is an isn’t allowed in an environment where htey have no meaningful feedback at all. “It’s against our community guidelines”. No one knows what the guidelines are. No one knows what does or does not violate them. No one knows if hte decision is made by a human or a machine.

        The thought process isn’t dissimilar to magic - People are doing ritualized actions to stave off the attention of their evil, hateful gods. if they make the sign of hte evil eye, if they say their prayers before bed, if they don’t say “suicide” then the evil dopamine god won’t de-list, de-monetize, or ban them.

        When they started doing behaviorialism research on animals, there was this one thing that stuck in my mind, they found ut that, if they just gave pigeons food at random times, like pigeons in cages, the pigeons would seemingly start to think that whatever it was they were doing when the food appeared caused the food to appear. So very quickly they’d end up with pigeons doing these little dance routines, because the pigeon had built up an association between what it was doing and the appearance of food. The pigeon didn’t know what hte fuck was happening, but it was trying to make sense of and control it’s situations.

        All these tortured neologisms, they’re the same thing. people are trying to talk, just talk, about important shit in theirlives and all these vast, opaque, inhuman regimes of censorship and punishment are pressing down on them. But they don’t know what hte rules are, the companies that have seized control of all mediums of public communication won’t tell them, will lie to them, so they’re trying to figure it out as individuals who either don’t understand science or don’t have the resources needed to interogate the system usinmg scienetific methods.

        It’s all fucked. There’s a metaphorical existentialist shaking you by the collar and screaming "DO YOU SEE? DO YOU SEE THE ABSURDITY OF A UNIVERSE THAT IS BOTH INDIFFERENT AND CRUEL?!?!?!?!

        • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s funny how it resembles a heightened version of what people accuse the USSR, PRC, and DPRK of. In gommunist chyna, citizens don’t know what they aren’t allowed to discuss or what words they aren’t allowed to use, so they speak in a contorted code to get past censors [who might not even care] when there is a rumor of a topic or word being forbidden. It’s like a panopticon where you don’t only not know when you are being watched, but you also don’t know what is being watched for.

          • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            Good point. iirc and it’s been years and I never actually read the book and just fibbed my way through class, but the whole The panopticon could be watching anyone at any time, so it doesn’t need to watch everyone all the time" was one of the key features of the panopticon regime. Like the whole thing in discipline and punish was that the system teaches people to disicipline and punish themselves, because that’s more efficient than a top down system. The system will always be more efficient if you teach people to censor and punish each other instead of haviung to hire a hundred billion police to do it directly.

            And yeah, the every accusation is projection thing. Lenin has some line about who the burgers own the papers, so the papers are censored in the interest of the burgers, so the “free press” and "freedom of speech’ are bullshit bc you can only say what the burger’s editor’s allow to be said.

            Also, I am always, always struck by the idea that the STASI would probably be horrified by the level of invasive surveillance everyone is subjected to every moment of every day, but people are totally blase about it, but I was told my whole life for decades after the cold war ended how horrifying it was that the Stasi was watching you pee or your neighbors were informing on you, but now everyone is informing on their neighbors all the time with nextdoor and shit, and anyway apparently when they dug in to the STASI’s archives after the Reich conquered the GDR they didn’t even find evidence that the STASI was murdering dissidents nad thought criminal sanyway?

            • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              You definitely have the main idea with the panopticon. I think someone more well-read than I could probably make really interesting points about how, in the original form one has an imagined cop in their head constantly enforcing externally-established rules, and this new version has an imagined cop constantly enforcing imagined rules of imagined scope. The notice for what is banned is replaced by a rumor-mill and the occasional high-profile case where “what tripped the censor?” still remains unclear and manual flagging sullies even this very messy sampling method.

              I don’t really know that much about the STASI, but it’s not like West Berlin wasn’t also heavily surveilling its denizens, and deaths in East Berlin get wildly overstated to the point of being a farce. That’s probably something gone over in “STASI State or Socialist Paradise?” but I haven’t gotten to it yet.

            • IzyaKatzmann [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              This comment too, I hope it makes or helps me read Discipline and Punish. The only exposure I had to Foucault confused me and made me hurt myself in confusion so I decided to stay away…

              What you wrote made it sound really interesting, here’s hopin’ I can read it sooner rather than later!

              • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                It was so fucking confusing I got much more out of media and video games and shit htat used the concept, and people talking about how panopticon actually works in real life, than I did from teh book itself. Like I stg Kojima has done more to help me understand philosophy than actual philsophers. So ma

    • SerLava [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Every genuine Gen Z linguistic invention is a word filter workaround. Nothing but mundane words that computer scientists can’t filter for fear of filtering far larger numbers of mundane and innocent posts and significantly harming revenue for internet platforms, only to watch the kids select a new mundane word to describe a dick

      • axont [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s either filter workarounds or it’s been widely popularizing existing terms that used to be more regional or strictly associated with black or hip-hop culture. Like cap, fam, simp, etc

        Which is pretty normal, isn’t it? A lot of slang from the 80s was just reappropriated southern California surfer lingo.

        • SerLava [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yes definitely, that’s the other main type of gen-z slang… Black gen-x slang. And it seems like even those borrowed terms lean towards the repurposed unfiltered ones. White programmers won’t think of Black slang but eventually they’ll get wise to it, unless it’s too unique and risks overfiltering white boomers talking about their day.

          Also I can wager that a lot of that 80’s California surfer lingo was ripped off from Hawai’i. California is the engine of Hawai’i’s cultural influence on the wider United States

          • GaveUp [she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You forgot Gen X 4chan slang. Idk how but incel terms are unironically mainstream now. I regularly hear “soy”, “normie”, “mewing”, “mog”, etc. IRL from pretty seemingly normal, well adjusted people. Both men and women like wtf

        • ProfessorAdonisCnut [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          Which is pretty normal, isn’t it? A lot of slang from the 80s was just reappropriated southern California surfer lingo.

          Yeah but when they did it it was a totally radical idea dude

      • Sinistar [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        only to watch the kids select a new mundane word to describe a dick.

        🍆💦🍑

        I’m just a fan of watering vegetables 😎

    • FunkyStuff [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is definitely one of those phrases, like “jannies” or “lolcow,” that raises the hairs on my back and gets me to reach for the report button.

      • TheLepidopterists [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 year ago

        No that one was motivated by cruelty. 4chan got it from a typo in someone’s memorial Myspace page after they killed themselves. It’s not a euphemism, it’s a direct mockery of suffering and death.

        • Shinji_Ikari [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I always saw it as jest over viewing someone who, when forced into something as terrible as suicide, is then reveled and called a hero once they’re gone, despite no one caring prior.

          Like making “an hero” into a meme was making fun of the way people need to make it about themselves by creating a spectacle and lesson around someone else’s hardship.

          Viewed through the 4chan lens, the people on 4chan were all suicidal and depressed, and had contempt for others who disregarded them until they were no longer around.

          Maybe I gave them too much credit but I also saw that shit happening real-time in high school after a couple deaths. One guy who committed suicide after a particularly bad benzo withdrawal was a step away from getting a purple heart, while another guy who died a week prior from cancer got a 5 second blurb in the announcements and was quickly forgotten about. I somewhat contradicted my point, but the real thing I’m trying to get at was the performance of grief over genuine grief, and I always read the og “an hero” post as a performance.