• ItsAFake@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    So, do we get to start calling what’s happening everywhere world war 3 or is there like some committee that meets on this?

    • BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      1 year ago

      Once some major players start conscripting people I think it’d be reasonable to call it WW3. This is the preamble

          • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            whether you or me like them or not, they are a major player.

            now we just need china and a couple more euro countries to join in on the fun.

            • jj4211@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Well it did say major players, plural. If you have major players directly in opposition and both feeling the need for conscription…

          • soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            You don’t think Russia is a major player in this current shitshow? Or was it an attempt to belittle Russia?

            I’m assuming its the latter because otherwise you’re a dense motherfucker

    • Bourff@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s a world war only when western european countries are involved. Otherwise it’s just sparkling conflict.

      • TheSanSabaSongbird
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        TBF, we aren’t even remotely close to the scale of international conflict seen in the 2 world wars. You have to be deeply ignorant to think otherwise. Again, we’re not even close, not even like a tiny fraction in terms of scale.

    • bluewing@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s never a world war until it’s over and the dust settles on the graves of millions around the globe.

  • BombOmOm@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    U.S. military forces today conducted strikes on seven facilities, which included more than 85 targets in Iraq and Syria, that Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and affiliated militias use to attack U.S. forces. This is the start of our response. The President has directed additional actions to hold the IRGC and affiliated militias accountable for their attacks on U.S. and Coalition Forces.

    • DdCno1@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why are you hoping that they don’t? Given the shenanigans the Iranian navy has been up to, promoting much of it to submersible status would be a good thing.

      • Cipher22@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, to be honest, this was a sarcastic comment to the time the US did accidentally sink more of their navy than intended. (A little more than 1/3 if their operational force.) The original goal was only 4 platforms IIRC. It may have grown a scotch before the end.

        Which probably doesn’t mean much to the sailors. Hind sight being 20/20 and all. Still a bit of an oops.

  • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The attacks are the first of many expected to take place.

    Washington Post’s Dan Lamothe has said that while the U.S. struck more than 85 individual targets in Iraq and Syria, these were spread just eight general locations in those two countries.

    U.S. officials have stressed that there is no plans currently to strike targets in Iran.

    • pan_troglodytes@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      we dont need to strike Iran directly. once their international assets get frozen they’ve got a limited window where they can do anything, and we just blew up most of their anything.

  • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hell yeah we just won in Afghanistan this is a great moment to start another winnable war in the middle east. Thanks Biden.

    • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t fire when fired upon, then. Sounds like a good way to get hit by a second round.

      • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Don’t interfere with the US or it’s vassal states while they are busy comitting genocide.

      • Agent641@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Bin Laden viewed the lack of response to the USS cole bombing as an absence of ‘chops’ of the US to strike back, hence he intensified his plans to force the US out of the middle east.

        To be fair though, Bin Laden was prepper and conspiracy theorist so it might not have influenced him heaps.

  • wellee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    42
    ·
    1 year ago

    Isn’t this all because the usa is supporting Israel and Iran is pushing back against countries supporting the genocide there?

    • Arete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      95
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ah yes Iran, that great bastion of human rights where they throw gay people off buildings and stone people to death.

      Iran doesn’t give a shit about Palestinians. Instability in the region keeps them in relative power. Everything they do should be viewed in that light.

      • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Instability in the region keeps them in relative power.

        how is that so?

        • GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Because with stability, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Yemen would have control of the world’s trade through the Red Sea and Suez Canal. Making tons of money on shipping through the region. Their regional power is de facto because other countries in the region are unstable and can’t secure trade through the canal.

          • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            how does that consolidate their power? i tought they didnt have direct influence over the canal, and are even trying to set up an alternative?

            • Arete@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              To anyone visualizing a comically long canal running straight through like 5 countries, you’re not actually far off. Unfortunately, it’s just a railroad to Moscow.

      • abuttandahalf@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Iran has politically, materially aligned itself with Palestinian liberation while the united states has aligned itself with Palestinian genocide. Your childish propagandized delusions about their motives are irrelevant. No amount of racist trope pushing is going to change it either.

      • Nudding@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        32
        ·
        1 year ago

        At least a woman can get an abortion in Iran lol. Glass houses and what not.

        Also, your country should stop supporting genocide. I believe that was the topic.

          • Nudding@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            15
            ·
            1 year ago

            Half of Americans still support the ongoing genocide so it’ll be a while until it clicks, in the slow one’s heads. The downvotes are funny Imo, notice there’s never any pushback.

            • Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              My friend you implied that LGBT people getting thrown off of buildings was equivalent to states banning abortion, that’s why I feel like I’m taking crazy pills.

            • pan_troglodytes@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              pushback… like arguing with the crazy people on the internet? no, that’s a giant waste of time. it’s simpler to downvote or block and move on

              • Nudding@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                No, pushback as in defense of your barbaric laws. Ignorance is bliss though, so you do you ✌️

                • Blueberrydreamer@lemmynsfw.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Why on earth would you expect people here to defend stupid ass laws in the US? We have more reason than anyone to fucking hate them, but that doesn’t make your nonsense any less of a pointless strawman and a waste of time to respond too. Enjoy the five minutes you sucked out of life with this absolute waste of bits.

    • TheSanSabaSongbird
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s a pleasant fiction. In reality Iran is a military dictatorship with Islamic window dressing. The Iranian regime is not some benevolent force acting out of humanitarian considerations. To the contrary, it’s a tyrannical and authoritarian rogue nation seeking wider regional hegemony through dozens of little proxy wars.