QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml to memes@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 year agoDeterminism Wlemmygrad.mlimagemessage-square106fedilinkarrow-up1100arrow-down10cross-posted to: memes@lemmy.mlmemes@lemmygrad.ml
arrow-up1100arrow-down1imageDeterminism Wlemmygrad.mlQueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml to memes@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square106fedilinkcross-posted to: memes@lemmy.mlmemes@lemmygrad.ml
minus-squareMaoo [none/use name]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year ago Your position from the first comment is free will and determinism both exist. Are you sure about that?
minus-squareQueerCommie@lemmygrad.mlOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 year ago Dialectical materialism holds that both are at work but that material conditions are dominant. Am I supposed to take “both” to not include “free will?”
minus-squareMaoo [none/use name]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoYou’re supposed to review your claim to see whether it’s accurate.
minus-squareQueerCommie@lemmygrad.mlOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoWhat claim do you want me to review?
minus-squareQueerCommie@lemmygrad.mlOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 year agoI stand behind my impression that “both” was intended to mean that diamat is ultimately compatiblist. A claim I disagree with, as I am not a compatiblist, yet I see no conflict between that and my dialectical materialist outlook.
minus-squareMaoo [none/use name]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoDo you really not know what I’m challenging you on?
minus-squareQueerCommie@lemmygrad.mlOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoThe question is not yet settled by simply debunking religious dogma?
minus-squareMaoo [none/use name]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoI guess that’s a yes lol
Are you sure about that?
Am I supposed to take “both” to not include “free will?”
You’re supposed to review your claim to see whether it’s accurate.
What claim do you want me to review?
The one I quoted
I stand behind my impression that “both” was intended to mean that diamat is ultimately compatiblist. A claim I disagree with, as I am not a compatiblist, yet I see no conflict between that and my dialectical materialist outlook.
Do you really not know what I’m challenging you on?
The question is not yet settled by simply debunking religious dogma?
I guess that’s a yes lol