HarryLime [any]@hexbear.net to Chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 2 years agotitlehexbear.netimagemessage-square45linkfedilinkarrow-up1158arrow-down10
arrow-up1158arrow-down1imagetitlehexbear.netHarryLime [any]@hexbear.net to Chapotraphouse@hexbear.netEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square45linkfedilink
minus-squareAbracadaniel [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·2 years ago4-7 ejaculations per week is optimal in decreasing prostate cancer risk?
minus-squareWhatDoYouMeanPodcast [comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·edit-22 years agoI don’t know about optimal, but it is superior (i.e. more optimal) to ejaculating less if your only metric is risk of prostate cancer.
minus-squareanarchoilluminati [comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·2 years agoWhat if your metric is being terminally cum brained?
minus-squareWhatDoYouMeanPodcast [comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·2 years agothen start with 40/week and see if you can still see straight afterward and go from there.
minus-squarelemmy_99c4zb3e3@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·edit-22 years agodeleted by creator
4-7 ejaculations per week is optimal in decreasing prostate cancer risk?
I don’t know about optimal, but it is superior (i.e. more optimal) to ejaculating less if your only metric is risk of prostate cancer.
What if your metric is being terminally cum brained?
then start with 40/week and see if you can still see straight afterward and go from there.
deleted by creator