Speaker [e/em/eir]

  • 10 Posts
  • 686 Comments
Joined 5 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 25th, 2020

help-circle















  • Lmao, this writer is surely directly paid by the State Department. The other article linked at the end of this one is “unnamed sources (some of them not white, allegedly!) claim that the R1 thinking knows the Truth about Red China, but the Seeseepee demands the machine censor itself”. Do not interrogate why the Evil Repressive State would demand the final result be censored but have nothing to say about the equally visible “thinking” process! Eat the slop!




  • There is “use the machine to write code for you” (foolish, a path to ruin) and there is “use the machine like a particularly incompetent coworker who nevertheless occasionally has an acceptable idea to iterate on”.

    If you are already an expert, it is possible to interpret the hallucinations of the machine to avoid some pointless dead-end approaches. More importantly, you’ve had to phrase the problem in simple enough terms that it can’t go too wrong, so you’ve mostly just got a notebook that spits text at you. There’s enough bullshit in there that you cannot trust it or use it as is, but none of the ego attached that a coworker might have when you call their idea ridiculous.

    Don’t use the machine to learn anything (it is trained on almost exclusively garbage), don’t use anything it spits out, don’t use it to “augment your abilities” (if you could identify the augmentation, you’d already have the ability). It is a rubber duck that does not need coffee.

    If your code is so completely brainless that the plagiarism machine can produce it, you’re better off writing a code generator to just do it right rather than making a token generator play act as a VIM macro.