

I have family in America, they all drove here and had no problem driving there.
Me on the other hand am a bit gimpy so I didn’t try driving there. I’m sure if I just went out and did it I’d be fine.


I have family in America, they all drove here and had no problem driving there.
Me on the other hand am a bit gimpy so I didn’t try driving there. I’m sure if I just went out and did it I’d be fine.


“That’s an absolute lie!”
Oh ok then. Sorry to bother you Mr War Criminal, as you were.


That’s a separate question.


I’m a 46 year old manager in a company that trades €25m per year and I have already told my boss not to expect my presence for at least a week when this comes out.


You’ll have to speak up, I’m wearing a towel.


Some people should be sterilised.


I don’t rely on public transport bery often, but these hikes make zero sense to me.
I was hearing for a while that people were being asked for ID but I never was. Maybe because my account is 10 years old at this stage?
Welcome.
Seems like the best of what reddit used to be here.


Ireland would be in the top 10 (if such an index were to exist) as we’re currently sitting around #4 in the Human Freedom Index. But we’re militarily neutral, and far more experienced in peace keeping rather than strategic military conflict.
So we’d sit that one out.


There’s more than a handful of member states involved in some form of armed conflict.
Who would be the enforcers?


Yeah I agree with that too.
Like I said I’m mostly ignorant to a lot of the nuance around the entire mess, but it seems like Israel has been playing a very long game. Or a few simultaneously.


Thanks for that. Admittedly I’m not an expert on the situation at all.
Do you reckon that was one of the main reasons it didn’t pass? From what I saw there were more local issues like fishing rights as one for example.


I’m more interested to see if their government will keep polling the issue until they get the answer they want.
Sorry, we’re talking Iceland not Ireland.
Seriously, it’d be better for everyone if there was a solid majority for it, rather than a thin margin. And they obviously have concerns. So either we address those concerns to add a new member or they re-evaluate. I don’t think either are ideal.
I also think that for something as significant as joining (or leaving) that a majorty of at least 60% should be the trigger, not 50.1% or whatever. But that’s not how democracy works either.
What was the question?


I agree completely.
And safety for all is important. The sceptic in me thinks it won’t impact the people who cause the most collisions.


Our readiness to offer protection to anyone in genuine need is respectable I think, so having a process in place if and when that protection isn’t granted should be respected too.


It’s like anything, targeting the low hanging fruit - people caught short in an unlucky timing of forgetting their hi vis one morning on the way to college. Scrotes who think it’s deadly knocking grannies over will either not be apprehended or just ignore the fines.
Like LUAS fares. You’ll always see a genuine tourist caught because they thought they were tapped on or whatever. But the fare dodgers get around the city scot and fare free.


I would have agreed before but do you really have faith that the Obtuse Orange man wouldn’t just let Bibi do what he wants in exchange for a public patting on the head?
It’s win win for Israel.
“America won’t let us, guess they’re antisemitic after all”
Or
“My best friend Donny said I could, any issues should be taken up with him, and that would make you antisemitic”.
But…but…that’s antisemitic…right?