13·
3 hours agoRemoved by mod
- 0 Posts
- 33 Comments
Joined 19 days ago
Cake day: December 13th, 2025
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
1·4 hours agoI hated that movie, so predictable I had to stop watching.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Yes. Because taking a side is a shit take. Defending an article taking a side is a shit take.
Whatever sort of “argument” you think you have by cherry-picking is a shit take.
1·19 hours ago“Can you name a country?” - JimmyKimmelLive, 2018
“EUROPE According to Americans” - artioxyt, 2022
“Jay Leno Jaywalking: Geography Test” - JayWalking Videos, 2019
Etcetera. Etcetera. Etcetera.
I only stopped adding links because you won’t be bothered to check any of them anyway.
I am a fucking statistician. And you need a fucking control group to establish causality.
Gtfo if you don’t understand this basic principle.
The article and your argument are both entirely devoid of substance.
Maybe avoid using imperatives on generalisations aimed at strangers? Really, calm your tits, no one is your dog. Gtfo.
Loving the better-than-thou aesthetic, is it something you were born with or did you curate it?
Clearly you’re a fucking arrogant bastard same as the OC I replied to. Maybe lay off the lead pipes.
Go end yourself instead of spewing that word vomit. 😄
You ignored my last paragraph. Yes it’s too early to tell, hence the opinion piece saying “Almost Certainly Linked To” is a distortion of reality. It’s laughably biased, and inductive in less-critical readers.
32·1 day agoRemoved by mod
Companies*
- Make sure Americans are taught how to fucking spell.
4·1 day agoNot France, not the Netherlands. Show me the stats on that claim?
In fact, are you American? 🙄
Because it’s not American, it’s German.
FYI for Americans, Germany is a country in the continent of Europe, you’re welcome.
Love the defense where instead of engaging you imply the other person has issues, because their opinion is different from your own.
Been drinking a bit too much water from lead pipes, bud?
“just as safe” is a relational, not absolutist, statement. I’m saying AI is at X level of safety, and more cases emerging does not imply an increasing risk of psychosis. That risk is where it’s always been.
You’re twisting my words because you’re likely one of those brain-dead AI haters.
I don’t particularly love or hate AI, the difference is I look at it critically instead of emotionally. If the population at large had the same X propensity for psychosis as the rate seen with AI usage, that just means it’s correlation without causation.
Removed by mod