

I don’t know Holman and Iozzo, but I remember hearing about Ito in the 00s and 10s in the tech industry.


I don’t know Holman and Iozzo, but I remember hearing about Ito in the 00s and 10s in the tech industry.


It’s powerful to see efforts like that of the volunteer citizens digging in to the released files early on, and making copies, are paying off. The epstein-data.com site that Sollenberger cites as his source for the scrubbed documents is on the list in the pinned post with Epstein Files resources in this community: https://lemmy.world/post/43115555


Thank you for your stewardship of this community. Glad to contribute.


Added a bullet list of “what we know” from the article on The Guardian. The BBC also has extensive reporting on the matter:


His philanthropy is also problematic for more reasons than tax dodging:
https://www.thenation.com/article/society/bill-gates-philanthropy-misanthropy/
Archived article: https://archive.ph/djOu5


The misconduct this is based on, is him passing confidential information directly to Epstein, while he was a trade envoy for the UK. That’s what they can get him on for now. This is an option to get him in the seat, and ask him about his relationship with Epstein.
It’s a small start, but it is a start.


Glad to see another line of investigation opened by the British police forces.


Great, thanks for pointing to the jmail one instead 👍


Also covered in CNN, and shared here earlier today:
~~https://lemmy.world/post/43230228~~ (that takes me to another (wrong) post.
This link should work: https://mander.xyz/post/47568270


Excellent.


Also, that April 7 exchange isn’t on the DOJ website anymore:
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet 10/EFTA01990936.pdf


Some excellent sleuthing right there. Thanks for doing that digging.


The github repo in the first listing has been turned into a website now, by the author:


He’s been examining the releases over a longer period. Check out videos on his voidzilla YouTube channel for some quality investigative work on what has been made public so far.


It’s quite well documented who’s behind jmail and the associated sites:


Exactly. It’s also refreshingly free from sensationalist claims of this, that or the other. It straightforwardly states what’s documented, how these documents are connected, and how these documents connect people and actions.
It poses critical questions and criticism of how investigations were done, and not done, how leads were not followed, and how redactions have been made that there seemingly are no legal grounds for.


The work this guy has put into it is pretty impressive. I know he’s been assisted by LLMs, but it still gets around a lot of avenues of exploration. I especially like the document that summarizes the institutional failures that are the thickest red lines throughout the Epstein case:


Jesus Christ what a bunch of pedo apologists.


That document is a wild ride.
5 hours long.
I’m 20mins in, and they get pretty much straight to the case of establishing the nature of the Epstein/Wexner relationship.