I’ll copy my comment from that other thread (since I’m subscribed to both communities):

Though it’s nice to have support from wealthy people… Building a cult around any single rich person for them to give grants to their liking is not a good idea.

Instead I believe you need to fight for your right to have privacy. Currently it’s Europe who is at risk with ChatControl ( https://fightchatcontrol.eu/ ). At other times, it’s other countries. Some open projects (like Lemmy!) get funded by the European Commission. I believe this is a healthier approach than to believe in good rich guys who’d save you.

Though it’s nice to have support from wealthy people… Building a cult around any single rich person for them to give grants to their liking is not a good idea.

Instead I believe you need to fight for your right to have privacy. Currently it’s Europe who is at risk with ChatControl ( https://fightchatcontrol.eu/ ). At other times, it’s other countries. Some open projects (like Lemmy!) get funded by the European Commission. I believe this is a healthier approach than to believe in good rich guys who’d save you.

Success with the house!

From what I understood, the data comes from here: https://www.nap.edu.au/naplan/results-and-reports And specifically the national data here: https://www.acara.edu.au/reporting/national-report-on-schooling-in-australia/naplan-national-results

(The article didn’t reference its sources I think? My comment is to complement.)

Oh I’ve misunderstood you at first, sorry. 🙈 I think I understand what you meant now.

@Zagorath, I don’t fully understand this, could you explain? If you think that the article has a poor base, why are you posting the article to Australia@aussie.zone?

It’s not only the efficiency boost. What about safe concurrency? Or about the tooling - does sbt really compare favorably to cargo? (I’d say “no”, having used both over multiple years)

No problem; thanks for trying to help!

Do you know if it works with Signal? (Doesn’t seem to be… Dunno why. Static build of the app? Non-http-based transport technology used by Signal?)

UPDATE: BTW, I’ve found some experimental support in CoMaps - supposedly, haven’t tried it https://codeberg.org/comaps/comaps/src/branch/main/docs/EXPERIMENTAL_PUBLIC_TRANSPORT_SUPPORT.md May be broken easily due to the experimental status of course…

UPDATE2: Tried Moovit, it still works without google services, whoray! … And still asks money or fills me up with ads to the brim, also as before…

UPDATE3: and it doesn’t allow putting GPS coordinates in the search field, unfortunately. This adds some churn if you’re switching between CoMaps and back…

UPDATE4: actually in Melbourne, Moovit didn’t find anything. Google Maps does. Not sure why this happens. Google Maps in a browser tab is also an option if things get dire…

deleted by creator

Oh wow, that’s a lot of useful information, huge thank you! Since as you’re indicating it’s the GTFS data underneath, I’ll try Moovit, which last time I checked worked even on my de-googlified phone (GrapheneOS without google services). Thanks again! 💚

Based on the comments so far, maybe something like this makes sense:

Warning: Private messages in Lemmy are not End-to-End encrypted, so the respective instance owners are technically able to read them. Please use a platform with E2E encryption for private messaging. Lemmy recommends Element.io and XMPP.

I agree. That’s why I propose to clarify the wording.

Yes. And I think saying “messages in Lemmy are not End-to-End encrypted” is clearer communication than “messages in Lemmy are not secure”.

Congratulations to the team and to everyone who supports the project!

Thanks for the response! I think I’d personally try something like that, but I have no idea whether it’ll stick.

Overall, the idea of a significantly simpler (than HTML) protocol sounds intriguing, especially to break the google chrome near-monopoly.

Thanks for the response!

Thanks for the response!

Such a thing exists in Amsterdam as well. From what I’ve read, it helps against poisoning etc quite a lot.