• ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    121
    ·
    1 month ago

    Isn’t the point of the congestion fee to relieve congestion? Each person that says “this fee is stupid & I’m not paying” is one less vehicle in the area.

    Sounds like a win.

    • Humanius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      That is indeed the goal, but there is still a PR battle to be had on the issue.

      To my knowledge this is the first time that congestion pricing has been implemented in North-America, and how people react to this will decide whether other North-American cities are willing to take the risk and do the same thing. Over the next couple of months there will likely be a lot of opinion pieces and article that try to make you think that the congestion pricing is a failure and should be reversed.

      • Threeme2189@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        I hope they don’t react the same way they did when roundabouts (rotaries/traffic circles) were introduced. Another thing that is only a problem in America and works well in many other countries.

        • effward@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Runabouts can be very awesome, but can anyone explain to me what the hell is going on in the UK where (in some places) they’ve added a bunch of traffic lights to their roundabouts? In my (admittedly limited) experience, they make them substantially worse, but perhaps I’m missing something?