• Owl@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        Why were they laughing ? This is a perfectly reasonable chess implementation

        • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          Typical snobbery.

          The Sinclair was rather ridiculed at the time as “not a real computer”.

          Nothing ever changes - Instead of being excited by someone having the skills to implement chess in 670k of memory by using freakin’ machine language, and appreciating the Sinclair for what it is, they compared to what they had.

          I mean wow, if you’ve never done machine language coding… I’m flabbergasted.

        • 1ns1p1d@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          12 days ago

          It was great. I was 10. I needed to be able to win once in a while, and I did.

          They were laughing because they were early neckbeards. They probably had 16k of ram on their fancy BBC Micros.