- cross-posted to:
- libjerk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- microblogmemes@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- libjerk@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- microblogmemes@lemmy.world
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/23485321
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/23485321
I didn’t say it. Although he did.
Where?
Btw are bolsheviks communists? Bc they clearly stated they are. No need to even read between the lines.
And what’s the relation between capitalism and slavery?
The point is that socialists can be socialists without applying Marx works in any way.
What worldview? What is my worldview?
Where? Here, maybe, where he ridicules the people who think the Nazis were socialists?
In this chapter, for example
They stated that as their goal. The Nazis stated a Reich enuring 1000 years as their goal. Did those succeed?
They’re compatible.
Name one socialist that came after Marx that doesn’t agree with him in some manner or the other.
Please, enlighten me. I could do with a bit of absurd fantasy worldbuilding.
So unless someone achieves communism, they’re not a communist? Btw, since 3rd Reich didn’t follow all nazi tenants and didn’t achieve all nazi goals, maybe they weren’t nazis?
Hitler
Sorry, but you’ve set up this perfect punchline yourself.
Oh, so you don’t know what my views are, but have already concluded they’re absurd. Well, jokes on you, I’m an anarcho communist (no)
Sure you didn’t read that in a dream?
Why did you ask whether or not the bolsheviki were communists, exactly?
Circular logic as an “argument”, then. Gotcha.
You’ve given enough hints (you consider yourself far right than call the Nazis far left), so I took a guess. I was open to reach another conclusion…
… But clearly, you’re afraid of further ridicule.