• Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      They’re on a carriage that’s like pontooned at the bottom, being pulled by the horse and driver who each have their own balloons.

      edit oh wait d’you mean the ones in the back right my bad dk about them

      • MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 days ago

        Back right?

        I see two in the back left and two more in the back middle without balloons. The two in the back right are the carriage passengers.

    • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      The rich do have flying cars. They just call them private jets. The rich own mansions (huge houses) all over the world, private islands, mega yachts that contain smaller yachts, their own submarines, and now they even have their own rocket ships

      • Yeah, but the police don’t hover over us in Spinners as in Bladerunner. They still have to chopper from helipad to airport and ride off in air traffic, so less in our faces.

        Their superfluous greenhouse emissions fit the cyberpunk vibe though.

  • MNByChoice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    7 days ago

    I love that the balloons are far too small. Like they didn’t understand the elements and buoyancy well enough to know the balloons have to be much larger. Not like we have negative mass particles.

    • Maalus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 days ago

      And you don’t have an issue with the carriage, with three people on it, where the only balloon is on the horse?

      Whoever made this was an artist and sucked at physics

      • Simulation6@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        The carriage could be on a barge and is just being pulled by the horse. How is the horse getting traction? And why is that man using a cane on water! The small balloons could just be artistic license for the drawing.

    • angrystego@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I’d be ok with splashing. I want this!

      Edit: Perhaps the shoes have keels or fins at the bottom and they use a skating-like motion to move around.

  • YoiksAndAway@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 days ago

    There are two people water-walking without balloons behind the two women on the left. Time travelers? Aliens? The JFK assassins? We deserve the truth!

  • rational_lib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Now I’m wondering why we don’t attach giant balloons to ships to reduce water resistance by cutting down how much of the ship needs to be underwater. Perhaps it’s because you would need more size for the balloon, and maybe the air resistance and water resistance needs to even out due to physical laws that I’m too lazy to think about?

    • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      The boat already floats. What is the point of making it lighter? Boats are handy for transporting extreme weights because water weighs more than air.

      If it should fly then get a Zepplin

    • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      Any amount of water contact introduces a fair amount of drag. There may be an ideal point somewhere in the middle, but I think if you take this to it’s natural conclusion you get a zeppelin.

      I did a little bit of math and I think that to lift the payload capacity (including fuel and crew) of a modern day Panama canal ship you would need about a tenth of the peak U.S. helium reserve (a cube about half a kilometer long on each edge, about 1.3x longer than the long dimension of the ship)

      I don’t think you’d get the best fuel efficiency going upwind lol

      Anything smaller would come with proportionally less downsides and at least proportionally less benefits. I doubt it could ever be a net positive in any useful metric.

      • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Hydrogen for sure. Partial lift for a boat has a lot of applications. Much more cargo than an airship, with no complications in flying empty. A fairly flat triangular “balloon” can be used as a solar platform, a sail, and be put in neutral wind mode down to the deck.

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Sounds like you’re vaguely describing a ground effect vehicle, basically a plane which coasts along the water. They’re more efficient than actually flying due to exploiting the ground effect on the lift surfaces, but ultimately it’s closer to a plane than a boat