• DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Are kids living under helicopter parents that want them to study abroad even allowed to have a social media account by the parents?

  • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Ah damn, I was a state actor who was going to smuggle in sleeper agents to perform sabotage and espionage in the US, but I can’t figure out how to create a fake social media profile. I admit defeat.

    • einkorn@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago
      • gets rejected at the border because officer doesn’t believe person doesn’t have social media accounts
      • ???
      • no profit
      • wastelandpilot [She/Her]@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I imagine this is what will happen even though it’s absurd. Like it’s actively going to become detrimental to not be trackable via an online presence connected to your identity because there are people who are mad that you won’t let them invade your privacy. Lol

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Trash country continues circling the drain.

    Remember folks, always vote against Republicans in the most likely manner to prevent them from having any level of power.

  • Vanth@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    So an applicant with dangerous people in their life, maybe an abusive family member or a stalker ex, is forced to expose their accounts they would otherwise keep private. That’s the first bad-case scenario that comes to mind, I’m sure there are more.

    I propose a new rule - if so for me, then so for thee. Anything imposed on legal applicants is also imposed on the lawmakers who put it in place.

  • SonOfAntenora@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    It’s going to be weird when there’s no handle or social media at all. I nuked my social media around 2020/2021, I was legit tired if people posting travel pics and pretending everything was alright. Oh by the way one could make a fake page just for this, but deep down we know we don’t care.

    • Kirp123@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      15 hours ago

      If you say that you have no social media accounts they will probably assume you’re lying and deny you.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      … but isn’t Lemmy social media? And you’re here. (Although I guess it is more accurately called antisocial media)

      • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        If you loosely follow the definition of social media to mean “Website where you can interact with people in any way” then yes.

        But I think the average colloquial use of the term social media really refers to websites where you make a real life personal profile and share things on that profile. Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, etc. You as the individual are the focus of those types of sites.

        The (original at least) point of sites like Lemmy and Reddit is sharing information where you as an individual are not the focus. Hence posting to communities rather than your own wall or profile, the use of usernames over real names etc.

      • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Lemmy also can’t be used non-publicly so a pointless distinction considering the context.

      • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I don’t think Lemmy would count as social media but that said, you can easily create a dummy account that just, for example, posts pictures of moths or beans or bread or whatever.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Lemmy is social media, but when people say “social media” they’re typically referring to one of two things. They either mean all social media including legacy forums or they mean media that is directly tied to their real names.

      • Dave@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I’ve heard social media where you interact with strangers instead of “friends” referred to as “antisocial media”.

      • SonOfAntenora@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Well well this is a recent account after all, so it is possible. Also, I do have a public social media, but it’s either used for messaging or it’s empty (follow - only).

          • msage@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            It’s so sweet that we want to act like anyone cares about our Lemmy history.

            I mean if there was anyone harasses IRL for posting here, hit me up with a link.

            But comparing Facebook to Lemmy is kind of funny.

          • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Closer to forums than IG. Anything old school deserves to not be bundled in with the rest of “social media”, so in that regard I get it. We still have handles though.

  • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    applicants for several kinds of student visas would be required to "adjust the privacy settings on all of their personal social media accounts to ‘public’

    They are so ridiculous.

    But ofc it’s not going to happen. They can lick my.

    • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      I question this, and really, their availability.

      With prep-time, any prosecutor and crew could dig up every tiny detail about you in about a week, including every single site any related IP addresses to you have been to and how much time you spend there and all of your dns queries.

      But here, on the spot. “You tell us”.

      Their lack of effort is correlated to the amount of spite they have for any individual person. It’s like using a magnifying glass. If they actually gave a shit, they wouldn’t have to ask.