3rd party would’ve made no difference bro. You’re coping. I won’t even do you the favor of telling you why you’re wrong. Your libtard brain is already stuck in the sand.
Instead of looking at the facts, you liberals think up hypotheticals that guarantee your pre-existing biases are confirmed. No room to hear other points of view. Y’all are just as bigoted as MAGAts in this way.
Please write back when you’re ready to have a grown up conversation.
no one replies to you
Idk if you have some Lemmy instances blocked or what, but I get plenty of replies. You added to that counter! I guess a proper gesture of gratitude is in order:
You don’t do reading comprehension well do you? None of that disproves what I claimed. This is always been a problem with dishonest tankies like you. You argue strawman and not what people actually say.
None of that disproves that there are likely counties and precincts which could have been won/swayed by third-party votes that could have made the difference. As I stated unfortunately there is no data that exists to show definitively one way or the other on that. But considering the margin of victory was just two or three percentage points. Third party voters could have easily made a difference in many places.
Please write back when you’re ready to have a grown up conversation.
I was having a grown-up conversation. You are the petulant little tanky that started off with name calling. 🤷♀️
Idk if you have some Lemmy instances blocked or what, but I get plenty of replies.
Hey genius, it was literally a reply to you stating that “they never reply”. So which is it? Do they reply or don’t they reply? Can you be consistent? Can you not lie? This is where we’re at now. 😅 strawmen and inconsistencies. I’m not surprised coming from a dishonest tanky. Though we always hope you all learn better someday. You’re worse than the Liberals you seem to hate so much. Don’t get me wrong it is hilarious to try to watch you all act like you’re mature between all the name calling and immaturity.
Clearly you’re arguing in bad faith here, otherwise you’d know that my proof casts major doubt on what you believe.
I don’t believe things based on a whim. I update my views based on the information available.
there is no data that exists to show definitively
Facepalms But you said that you have proof that the 3rd party wouldn’t have mattered? Or now that I’ve given my evidence, you mean to say that you have nothing to show for your claims.
I also love to speculate when it reinforces my preconceived notions!
You are the petulant little tanky that started off with name calling. 🤷♀️
Uh, yeah. It’s in the first comment I made, before you responded to it, dumbass. If you didn’t see what kind of interlocutor I was, then maybe you would have changed your approach? Soy Libs and Soy Right these days.
Can you not lie?
Unless you shit libs learn the difference between yes or no, on or off, up or down, left or right, I guess anything is a lie to you 😅😅😅
You’re worse than the Liberals
Coming from a liberal, that’s pretty much what I would expect you to say!
Proof.
3rd party would’ve made no difference bro. You’re coping. I won’t even do you the favor of telling you why you’re wrong. Your libtard brain is already stuck in the sand.
Instead of looking at the facts, you liberals think up hypotheticals that guarantee your pre-existing biases are confirmed. No room to hear other points of view. Y’all are just as bigoted as MAGAts in this way.
Please write back when you’re ready to have a grown up conversation.
Idk if you have some Lemmy instances blocked or what, but I get plenty of replies. You added to that counter! I guess a proper gesture of gratitude is in order:
THANK YOU!
You don’t do reading comprehension well do you? None of that disproves what I claimed. This is always been a problem with dishonest tankies like you. You argue strawman and not what people actually say.
None of that disproves that there are likely counties and precincts which could have been won/swayed by third-party votes that could have made the difference. As I stated unfortunately there is no data that exists to show definitively one way or the other on that. But considering the margin of victory was just two or three percentage points. Third party voters could have easily made a difference in many places.
I was having a grown-up conversation. You are the petulant little tanky that started off with name calling. 🤷♀️
Hey genius, it was literally a reply to you stating that “they never reply”. So which is it? Do they reply or don’t they reply? Can you be consistent? Can you not lie? This is where we’re at now. 😅 strawmen and inconsistencies. I’m not surprised coming from a dishonest tanky. Though we always hope you all learn better someday. You’re worse than the Liberals you seem to hate so much. Don’t get me wrong it is hilarious to try to watch you all act like you’re mature between all the name calling and immaturity.
Goes on to show no proof, while I do.
Clearly you’re arguing in bad faith here, otherwise you’d know that my proof casts major doubt on what you believe.
I don’t believe things based on a whim. I update my views based on the information available.
Facepalms But you said that you have proof that the 3rd party wouldn’t have mattered? Or now that I’ve given my evidence, you mean to say that you have nothing to show for your claims.
I also love to speculate when it reinforces my preconceived notions!
Uh, yeah. It’s in the first comment I made, before you responded to it, dumbass. If you didn’t see what kind of interlocutor I was, then maybe you would have changed your approach? Soy Libs and Soy Right these days.
Unless you shit libs learn the difference between yes or no, on or off, up or down, left or right, I guess anything is a lie to you 😅😅😅
Coming from a liberal, that’s pretty much what I would expect you to say!