This young evangelical guy is one of the most popular man in the US. Many americans respect him.
He said Joe Biden was an illegitimate President because Trump won the 2020 US Presidential Election.
He had no issue when JD Vance falsely accused Haitians in Ohio of eating cats and dogs. It didn’t bother him at all that these people received death threats.
He praised Trump for sending people with no criminal records to prison in South America (1) (2)
He said the US had wonderful gun laws that shouldn’t change. He thinks Canadian gun laws are silly.
https://www.newsweek.com/charlie-kirk-says-gun-deaths-worth-it-2nd-amendment-1793113
I don’t condone violence or murder. But I’m not going to cry either. Sorry.
How old are you? Have you ever been exposed to personal tragedy?
How old are you? Have you ever been exposed to the consequences of violent, fascist rhetoric?
It’s pretty clear they haven’t been. I’m going to guess white, male, and toward the upper end of the middle class. They don’t have to deal with the systematic de-personing of non-whites and non-males, not to mention the de-humanizing of the LGBTQ+ portion of society. It’s easy to make pronouncements from on high when you’re, you know, on high.
Late 20s, why do you ask?
Young white male?
How much more information will you request of them? Want to provide the full list beforehand?
Just submit your identification for age verification, it’s what Charlie would have wanted.
It is not a “tragedy” when someone reaps the consequences of their actions at the hand of the very tool he fully advocated the use of.
That, my dear friend, is called “comedy”. In the theatrical sense of the term, not the modern vernacular.
This is a regime whore we are talking about. There is nothing personal here.
People have zero obligation to provide sympathy to a hostile operative shilling enemy’s talking points.