Lemdro.id
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
cm0002 to Fuck Cars@lemmy.caEnglish · 3 months ago

Those monstrosities should be f*ing illegal

lemmy.ml

message-square
34
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • fuck_cars@lemmy.ml
247

Those monstrosities should be f*ing illegal

lemmy.ml

cm0002 to Fuck Cars@lemmy.caEnglish · 3 months ago
message-square
34
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • fuck_cars@lemmy.ml
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • Hegar@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    3 months ago

    An M1 Abrams main battle tank has better visibility of children in front of it than the F-series and similar pointless toys.

    • yabai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m curious if this is factual. Would make for a hell of an anti-marketing campaign.

      • Hegar@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        3 months ago

        I saw diagrams labeled with heights and viewing angles that was pretty convincing. It showed that an M1 would spot the kid from further out than an f150 would.

        Edit: F250 and similar, but maybe not the actual F150 per the image below. If you search some combo of f150 m1 viewing distance I’m sure you’ll find it.

        https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftse2.mm.bing.net%2Fth%2Fid%2FOIP.xEKpakhV6NQJVU9OdgIHEAHaNf%3Fcb%3D12%26pid%3DApi&f=1&ipt=ea664c8bc927433c573a7cd67dd7a04078583a4f55c1730f3f40e5394d2dce30&ipo=images

        • AtariDump@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          3 months ago

          • nissetingsvall@mastodon.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            @AtariDump @Hegar
            I can’t see your latest reply,
            But might it have been this one?

            • Hegar@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Yep!

    • JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      What about a Type 59?

  • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    They’re fine on the job site.

    Thing is, most people buying them only ever haul their asses to Starbucks. They’re a status symbol. And they’re fucking ridiculous. Like what you like but if you’re just doing suburban driving, you should drive a little electric vehicle. Who cares if it’s “not manly,” it’s the most efficient tool for the job.

    • Hegar@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      3 months ago

      Pickups are useful on job sites. But I don’t think there was a strong need to double their size and make them way more dangerous and way less efficient.

    • rollerbang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      They don’t have to be tall to haul. And most job sites don’t require “off-road like” capabilities.

    • Nik282000@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      They’re fine on the job site.

      HA!

      Every manager and supervisor drives one of these giant fucking abominations. The guys who actually work have vans, they hold more stuff and use less gas.

      • Rachel@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Even more because your tools are more difficult to steal in a van and if you really needed to move a lot of lumber or other big stuff you can use a trailer.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Honestly, it’s far more manly. The least manly thing you can do is worry about how manly people think you look. If you’re actually secure in your manliness you don’t need a giant truck to make sure people know you’re really a man. It just makes you look insecure and weak.

    • Goun@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      They’re fine on the job site.

      What kind of jobs you ppl have where you don’t want to see your surroundings? These are not even efficient, and waste tons of space, ffs.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      if you’re just doing suburban driving, you should drive a little electric vehicle.

      If only there were more options available in that category.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s insecurity.

      • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        it’s not just insecurity. it’s reality.

        i’m a man in the target demo of these trucks. i don’t own one, i own a hatchback sedan. easily half the women I have dated… think I drive a ‘girlie’ car and they are legit upset by it. If I owned a massive overpriced truck i’d be sexually rewarded for it. they say shit like ‘i want to feel safe and protected in a large vehicle.’

        lots and lots of people believe these vehicles are a necessity, insecurity or not. i also live in downtown Boston, where people are ‘eco’ and liberal are buying the e-version of these trucks/suvs. but they still think little cars are make you gay and weak.

        • Wahots@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          One of my gay friends just got a large truck and is having an aneurysm trying to find parking for it in a city. Stress nightmare, lol.

  • RaoulDuke@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • GuyLivingHere@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Lately? Deliberately going on pages of their political adversaries to spout vitriol, and fully not expecting any sort of negative reaction from said vitriol.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah, can we go back to when the insecure tiny dick people just got big stupid cars instead of ruining entire nations?

  • SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yeah those child mannequins are freaky-deaky

  • TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Mannequins?

  • mysticpickle@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Children?

  • _AutumnMoon_@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    agree we should ban short mannequins imagine if that poor truck was ruined because it didn’t see them! or something like that

  • altkey (he\him)@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I wish the owner a very unpleasant Condemned: Criminal Origins moment

  • Lembot_0004@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • calliope@retrolemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      3 months ago

      This is especially funny, given just how many buses I’ve seen that don’t have this problem.

    • CMDR_Horn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      • Cybersec@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Who has a pony? Hope was I supposed to know she had a pony?

        • Noxy@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Seinfeld reference

    • rollerbang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      Most bus drivers are literally first in the line. Engine in the back. With poor posture and no windshield they’d almost fall out.

      Not to mention that they actually serve a purpose hard to achieve in another form.

      • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Not all buses are designed like that. Most american school buses are like this. But you may notice that they have mirrors on the nose.

        • rollerbang@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          I never claimed they’re all like that 🤷‍♂️

    • Wahots@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Our buses have extremely great sightlines up front!

    • Hirom@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      An alternative to a ban: require a truck driving license for such big vehicles with limited visibility, ie this kind of SUV. Also, enforce the same kind of speed restrictions and fordidden areas as trucks, ie exclude from neighboorhoods with narrow streets.

      • Lembot_0004@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        deleted by creator

Fuck Cars@lemmy.ca

fuckcars@lemmy.ca

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !fuckcars@lemmy.ca

Your hub for collection of materials that contribute to a world with less car ownership. Including buses, motorcycles, bicycles, skateboards, longboards, scooters, hoverboards, e-scooters, pedestrians, walking, running.

Learn
  • AboutHere - Videos to understand your city better. Creator is based out of Vancouver, BC.
  • NotJustBikes - Stories of successful and not so successful urban planning.
  • RMTransit - In-depth analysis of public transit systems around the world.
  • Cycling Fallacies
Basic Rules:
  • be constructive: there is no need of another internet space full of competition, negativity, rage etc.;
  • no bigotry, including racism, sexism, ableism, transphobia, homophobia or xenophobia;
  • be empathic: empathy is more rebellious than a middle finger;
  • no porn and no gore: let’s keep this place easy to manage;
  • no ads / spamming / flooding, we don’t want to buy/consume your commodified ideas;
  • occasional self-promotion by active members is fine.
Chat
  • Matrix
  • Discord
Get Involved
  • Alberta - Alberta Cycling Coalition
    • Edmonton - Bike Edmonton
  • British Columbia - The BC Cycling Coalition
    • Vancouver - HUB Cycling
    • Victoria - Capital Bike
  • Manitoba
    • Winnipeg - Bike Winnipeg
  • Ontario - Share the Road Cycling Coalition
    • Ottawa - Bike Ottawa
    • Toronto - CycleToronto
  • Quebec - Vélo Québec
  • Saskatchewan
    • Saskatoon - Saskatoon Cycles

* message the mods to add any missing local advocacy groups.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1 user / day
  • 25 users / week
  • 362 users / month
  • 1.57K users / 6 months
  • 3 local subscribers
  • 1.34K subscribers
  • 253 Posts
  • 962 Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Kokomheart@lemmy.ca
  • sexy_peach@feddit.de
  • graphito@beehaw.org
  • 𝗧𝗼𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿 *𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑦 𝑝𝑢𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑑 𝑑𝑜𝑤𝑛@slrpnk.net
  • UI: 0.19.11
  • BE: 0.19.12
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org