• L7HM77@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Minor system modification that would life-changingly benefit >90% of the population, for this generation and the next, while leaving the other 10% relatively unaffected, blocked with no support after decades of waiting: “Absolutely not, this is an unprecedented proposal, fuck you for even considering it”

    Major system modification that uproots all precedent, completely changes all the existing procedures, massively benefits two people while fucking over everyone else, passed with unopposed unanimous support three weeks after submission: “Look, someone was gonna push the ‘Fuck You’ button eventually anyway, might as well do it now”

  • Infernal_pizza@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    Developers accidentally create new issues while trying to fix old ones. Politicians purposely create new issues while avoiding fixing the old ones

    • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, at least I actually do fix the old issues.

      Also, Git for laws might not be the worst idea. Reverting Citizens United would be nice.

    • inzen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I may or may not know multiple developers that create new issues while avoiding fixing old ones.

  • insomniac_lemon@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Politician leans too close into mic: “WORKS AS INTENDED

    Reporter: “but this is a clear-”

    Politician: “lmao wontfix”

  • zd9@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    On another account on reddit I asked some political science subreddit “what if we used a type of git tool for bill contributions and history tracking?” It would have to be extremely simplified for such tech illiterate people to navigate it of course, but the consensus seemed to be that lobbyists could still sneak in their own language in massive pushes with opaque commit comments.

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      No one reads the bill anyways… Especially not the people voting on it

      Most bills are insane enough even without history tracking

    • cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      First step to solving a problem is recognizing it exists, shitlib.

      It is in fact possible to want change and make things better, and not just hold on to the good things and class position you already have while being so terrified of positive change you cause a global fasch cascade to keep the damn commies away.