You can go to my sponsor https://aura.com/revolutionary to try 14 days for free. That’s enough time for Aura to start scrubbing your personal info off these ...
But as AssortedBiscuits said, God’s perfection implies that there can’t ever be change, so what dialectical relationship can exist between the persons of the trinity? Usually both parts of a dialectic need to be able to move for there to be transformation. Also, since the three different persons still have the same nature, it seems strange to me to say they have any kind of contradiction between them, beyond the fact that each one is not the other two.
The fact that creation has change implies an inherent contradiction, which is why the Son is even distinct from the Father. Contradiction as a form doesn’t inherently mean an inconsistency of nature or of will, any more than a rock falling to the ground has an inconsistency between gravity and intertia. They’re both in contradiction in the sense of imbalance, and in accord, in that both are smoothly working according to their nature.
As for the lack of change in one part of the dialectic, that’s the contradiction that results in the Spirit, the mediating force that allows modification of the action of the static upon the dynamic. The static cannot change, the dynamic is in action, so something new must occur.
Ah, I forgot to mention the Zionist kabbalist asserts the tetragrammaton means, “I am becoming what I am becoming,” which makes more sense. As are all of us.
But as AssortedBiscuits said, God’s perfection implies that there can’t ever be change, so what dialectical relationship can exist between the persons of the trinity? Usually both parts of a dialectic need to be able to move for there to be transformation. Also, since the three different persons still have the same nature, it seems strange to me to say they have any kind of contradiction between them, beyond the fact that each one is not the other two.
The fact that creation has change implies an inherent contradiction, which is why the Son is even distinct from the Father. Contradiction as a form doesn’t inherently mean an inconsistency of nature or of will, any more than a rock falling to the ground has an inconsistency between gravity and intertia. They’re both in contradiction in the sense of imbalance, and in accord, in that both are smoothly working according to their nature.
As for the lack of change in one part of the dialectic, that’s the contradiction that results in the Spirit, the mediating force that allows modification of the action of the static upon the dynamic. The static cannot change, the dynamic is in action, so something new must occur.
Ah, I forgot to mention the Zionist kabbalist asserts the tetragrammaton means, “I am becoming what I am becoming,” which makes more sense. As are all of us.