• jambudz@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    4 days ago

    The Richter scale has no theoretical limit. It has a practical limit based on limits of what energy could be released, but there is no hard this stops at 10

      • MotoAsh@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        4 days ago

        Someone else replied to the same person with a video link explaining the practical limits. TL;DW, the practical limit is anything past ~10+ would require massive upheaval. Not to say they’re impossible, but beyond 10, you’re likely looking at needing to adjust maps or worse.

          • MotoAsh@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Yea, an extinction event from a single impact would be crazy!

            I seriously struggle to imagine it. Even in comparison to Tsar Bomba, the largest nuke ever detonated, which was insane, Chicxulub was several orders of magnitude worse as far as energy release.

            The fact a not even all that big piece of rock could result in such insane forces is … well, it shouldn’t be surprising given the magnitude of ‘c’ and e=mc^2, but since when has any of that been completely intuitive!?

            … and then there’s the impact that created the moon … and a hundred other kinds of impacts and reactions across the universe that are yet again so many orders of magnitude greater… Even if the numbers can be found, the universe truly is (almost by definition) incomprehensible.

  • ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    “I’m a creep, not a lying creep.”

    Also, doing any kind of workout with someone’s elbow in the small of your back sounds horrible.

  • arctanthrope@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    4 days ago

    also the Richter scale is logarithmic; each point is ten times as much as the previous. so a 3 is not 30% as much as a 10, it’s one ten-millionth as much

  • Ech@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    It also isn’t linear, so his dick is 107 times smaller than the maximum. ie 0.000001/10.

    • the_tab_key@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      Considering the size difference between the two, big guy probably would barely feel it.

      Reminds me of the video where some jackass drop kicked Arnold in the back and Arnold stumbled but didn’t fall over, whereas I would have split in half.

  • A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Is really hard to feel a 3.0 richter.

    We have many of those a day and you rarely notice.

    8.8 richter tough, Yeah that’s fun.

  • assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    The Richter scale has no upper bounds. Unless you consider a point where there is so much energy in such a small area that black holes form.