• tahoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    3 months ago

    The fact that this is just a handheld iPhone video and not a professionally shot thing makes it so much more surreal

    • b34k@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Meh, I would have preferred they used a nice camera. Those Z9s they brought with them can shoot 8k video at 60 fps. When you’re something that’s once in a lifetime, for all of humanity, do it in the best quality possible.

  • jaaake@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    3 months ago

    Judging from first few seconds of this, I expected Cylon Raiders to come screaming across the horizon.

  • gnufuu@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    I 🧑‍🦲 am happy 😊 that you 🫵 put these emojis 😐, otherwise I 🧑‍🦲 wouldn’t have understood 🤷

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I still don’t understand this use of emoji.

      It’s not “I shoved a 🌵 up my 🍆”, I could get that, reject alphabet return to pictogram for the sake of compression if nothing else. But no, it’s “I shoved a cactus 🌵 up my dick 🍆” which is just…why are we doing this?

      • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s only compressing the message visually (it generally uses more data)

        Also, at least for me, it takes more work to parse the images than words require. I have to like… shift out of reading mode, comprehend the image and then go back to reading.

            • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Than an entire word?

              Take “cactus” for example. Each letter in the word “cactus” is one unicode character, for a total of six. 🌵 is one unicode character, U+1F335.

              Unicode characters are 4 bytes long, so “cactus” takes 24 bytes to transmit, where “🌵” takes 4. Unless something something UTF_8?

              • onlyhalfminotaur@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                You’re close, Unicode characters don’t imply a number of bytes, it’s how they’re encoded that does (utf-8 most commonly). Utf-8 can be as little as one byte or as many as four, depending on the specific character. I don’t know about emojis but I imagine they’re in the four bytes section. Where’s “asdf” is also four bytes in utf-8.

                • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  So I just looked it up, the UTF-8 encoding for the cactus emoji is 4 bytes long: 0xF0 0x9F 0x8C 0xB5

                  Where the Latin alphabet is in the 1-byte region.

                  So it takes 6 bytes to transmit “cactus” in UTF-8, and only 4 to transmit “🌵”. So any emoji that replaces 5 or more letters is more efficient. 🍆 breaks even with “dick” or “cock”, more efficient than “penis”, more than twice as compact as “eggplant” or “aubergine”.

                • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Yes, to be clear I meant the example I gave where the word was replaced with the emoji was compression, not where they give the word and its emoji. That’s as long-handed as possible.

  • Big_Boss_77@fedinsfw.app
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 months ago

    What goes through your mind at that point? Like… the train of thought at that point had to be just wild.

  • GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    “Earthset.” Fuck, that would be such a cool title for a sci-fi novel. I’m sure someone else has taken it already, but still, it’s such a cool word.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I couldn’t find one, surprisingly. At least no popular title. However, there is an Asimov short Earthset and Evening Star, I could find no reasonable sources to preview the story.

  • Speiser0@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    In german when the sun sets, we say “die Sonne geht unter” (the sun goes below / the sun sinks). And for doomsday we say “die Welt geht unter” (the world goes below). What we’re seeing here is doomsday.

  • Madu@fedinsfw.app
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Gotta say it’s nice to be at a place online where half the comments aren’t “obviously fake! Fake news! Everyone who believes this is a brainwashed sheep!” and so on, which they would (and I’m sure are) on Reddit, Youtube, Facebook etc. Not a single one here, it feels good.