• Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      Unfortunately, gasoline woes will ripple through nearly every commodity or grocery that you partake in. If you’re truly off grid, it probably won’t do much. But as long as you shop from grocery stores or buy things period, you’re gonna feel it a little. Not as much as a gas-guzzler, but you’ll feel it.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        16 days ago

        I mean I’m just piss posting and I’m deeply concerned for how it is going to impact my community, which is extremely impoverished and working class, and often have super long commutes.

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 days ago

        It’s a good thing the government is also actively hostile to any alternative to fossil fuels /s

        We could have dulled the impact by converting the grid to renewables 5 years ago, but Joe Manchin thought that might hurt his constituents.

        Clearly Joe Manchin only considers the mine owners his constituency…

    • deft@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      16 days ago

      It’s not just gas. Any plastic.

      My job is already seeing disposable gloves explode in price

      • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        16 days ago

        Half of the modern world is reliant on petroleum based products. Gasoline and Diesel are about 70% of modern crude oil usage, but that remaining 30% is everywhere.

          • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            16 days ago

            The sentinelese are always laughing at us.

            You know that meme about how we’re meant for eating fruit on the beach but instead we have to pay taxes? I’d violently defend my ability to opt out of that as well.

            • arrow74@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              16 days ago

              Idk modern medical care and pain relief is also pretty nice. There are some pretty brutal ways to die that we can avoid with modern technology

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 days ago

        Perhaps ethane based plastics not affected in the USA at least. Its a “waste product” from shale gas extraction. There are laws on how much producers can burn, and if they don’t have a home for it they have to stop extracting methane. So they price it so cheap its essentially paying people to take it so they can go back to extracting methane. The USA produces 40% of the worlds ethane. This is also one of the reasons plastic recycling isn’t financially feasible here. Ethane is just too cheap to make virgin plastic vs the costly process of collection and recycling of non-virgin plastics. source

      • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 days ago

        Not any plastic. For example, much of the ethylene used to make PE is a common byproduct of natural gas production, that occurs in such quantity that producers almost have to pay to have it taken away.

  • auzy1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    16 days ago

    It’s ironic that a guy who hates “chy-nah” so much and wants to “drill”, has likely done more to push Chinese cars worldwide, and EV’s than any other president in history.

    Whilst quality of life has dropped, he’s also done an amazing job in pushing the AUD upwards vs USD too

    • benjirenji@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      However the real transformation we gotta do is to move to more public transportation (which can also be electrified) but these budgets are all gone under Trump.

      • backalleycoyote@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        16 days ago

        If this continues and people are forced out of their normal single occupant, drive to where they could have walked in 5min habits, I wouldn’t be surprised to see other options pop up. Except not public, but privately owned by one of a dozen billionaires. And you can’t pay by the ride, it’s a monthly subscription to use it. And only white people can sit up front.

        • benjirenji@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          16 days ago

          I think this idea was floated and partially implemented by Uber already.

          People need to realize that it doesn’t need to be profitable. Public transportation is a service with many beneficial side effects and efficiencies. The money you lose providing the service to the public reduces other costs. This is why corporations can’t and shouldn’t take it over.

          Just to be clear: it doesn’t need to be free. But it could “lose” money.

          • backalleycoyote@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            16 days ago

            Doesn’t need to be profitable but could be turned into something profitable is the guiding principle of the oligarchy. These are the people that don’t think food and water are a basic human right. And their constituency is of the belief that public transportation is a poverty indicator. When my city wanted to build a new bus depot in downtown they showed up en masse to speak against it because they said it would be a magnet for the homeless and crime, drive property values down. It’s a two front fight against the capitalists who know they can exploit it and the section of the general public that considers any use of public funds that don’t directly benefit themselves as theft. Don’t ask them to consider that every person on a bus is one less car in front of them while they’re stuck in traffic, they’re incapable of such abstract thinking.

        • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          not Europe.

          How do you get to the rail, and when you get to the destination city, do they have any public transit that isn’t shit?

        • benjirenji@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          16 days ago

          Oh we have to do exactly that, but my point is that just electrifying the cars is far from enough. We need fewer cars, not just have them be electric.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      16 days ago

      It’s like he doesn’t understand markets, trade, geopolitics, or just basic business.

      Not like we didn’t know that about him before he got elected. The first time.

        • auzy1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          15 days ago

          Long term they do, and they are the best placed for EVs in the future(especially since Elon went full Nazi at one point)

          There are a more of US brands they’ll likely kill off I suspect

          My friend worked and Nissan and he expects them to be gone soonish (he now works MG).

          And the 4wd repair shop here in Australia doesn’t expect Jeep to be around in 10 years either

          Whereas, I think everyone expects byd to be around in 10 years

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    16 days ago

    All because of one low IQ pedo and the members of Congress and the public that support that pedo.

  • MyBrainHurts@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 days ago

    Okay, but on the plus side we’re hardly talking about the Epstein files so I think we can chalk this up as a win for America.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 days ago

      its by design, he already tried 2 other assasination attempt after the iran war started affect EVERYONE now to distract people. Todd blanche being suddenly replacing Pam bondi he needed a distraction from that, plus other portions of the files are being exposed. the MSM keeps reporting on his gaffes though as if its a “shocking thing” the resistance grifters arnt helping either, like BTC,etc. Some in the DNC doesnt want it released either.

    • MBech@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      16 days ago

      To be completely fair to the americans complaining about fuel prices though. European prices are by design. Prices increasef in the 70’s during the oil crisis, and afterwards we kept them high through taxation. We did that to give a larger incentive to oil reducing behavior like buying a car that drives longer per liter, or insulating your house better. This was to reduce our dependance in oil so another crisis wouldn’t hit as hard.

      USA didn’t do that, because USA has/had plenty oil to support itself, and those regulations would mean less oil sales and thus less money for the giant oil companies. Wouldn’t wanna take money out of the wallets of the poor rich cunts right?

      So in short, Europe voted for less oil dependance because we don’t produce a lot of it, USA voted for more, because their rich cunts have always controlled the government.

      • halferect@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        16 days ago

        The taxes thing is important thing to realize, in the US it’s like maybe 20cents a gallon and in parts of Europe it’s 7 dollars a gallon.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          16 days ago

          Yeah and it sounds like in some parts of europe the gas tax is a percentage of the cost. In the US its a flat fee per gallon (idk anything else with that tax structure). This means that gas taxes rarely increase. They were supposed to pay for roads, but it’s been decades since they did that because raising gas prices intentionally, especially as a tax, is just going to give your opponents attack ads. A lot of our municipalities are running out of money paying for roads these days.

      • Freeposity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        USA didn’t do that, because USA has/had plenty oil to support itself

        Only 60% of the oil produced in the US is used by the refineries in the US. But even if it were 100%, oil is still globally traded and thus the price is tied to global availability.

        When I talk to MAGA types who say we should only be using our own oil, they don’t realize they are endorsing an anti-capitalistic solution to gas prices. They resist this knowledge when I point it out to them.

        • AAA@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 days ago

          She’s either lying, or you calculate in British gallone, instead of American gallon. Diesel never passed 3€/L in Germany, not even close.

          • Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            16 days ago

            €3 is $3.54 per liter, a gallon is 3.8 liters math that out and you get $13.45 per gallon.

            Its entirely possible that she’s lying but I distinctly paying €2.90 during COVID for our two diesel cars.

            I just checked Ich-tanke and it looks like it dropped over the last couple of weeks, on the site it say 2.01 so now we’re at $9 a gallon

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      EU, gas is more expensive but they have a reasonable enough transportation system in most countries, of course like long distances you might need car instead.

      • Pofski@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        Where are you from in Europe? The price here is 8.22 a gallon at the moment, but we expect it to go up again a bit on Monday.

  • ViceroTempus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    15 days ago

    K but somehow seems less important than the fact that Donald Trump raped and trafficked children and the Republican Party is protecting him.

    With that said, sucks it’s going to cost so much to light him on fire after dumping gasoline on him, but it’s worth it. Think of the children.

      • ViceroTempus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        15 days ago

        No? I think the fact a child rapist has been allowed to be President is of greater concern than rising gas prices. That between the two gas prices are less important than the fact the child rapist hasn’t been excised from office and preferably killed in such a way as to set an example to the rest of the Epstein Class.

        Unless I fucked up that sentiment somehow in my previous post?

        • Lollerskater@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          15 days ago

          Ah, yes. Then yes, you did. Explanation tracks with your sentiment, but @seriousslayerguy@lemmy.world 's correction is what you want. Fully written out text you can spot which part of the comparison you took by mistake: somehow the gas prices seem more important news, while they should be less important than the child raping.

          • ViceroTempus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 days ago

            Ahh, I see my tongue in cheek tone didn’t make it through in the first part of the sentence. Welp, it happens.

        • seriousslayerguy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 days ago

          I agree that the stuff about trump is more important than gas prices therefore i wanted to correct your first sentence. You meant it seems that people care more about gas prices than the child rapist in power. So you should have written “more”, not “less”, if you meant it the way you just explained.

          • ViceroTempus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            15 days ago

            Okay no, you partially misunderstood/misread my comment. It was written more as a tongue in cheek reply to the Title. Another way to put the first of my original sentence is “K but (Gas Prices) somehow seems less important than…”

            I wrote it exactly how I meant it. If I replaced it with more not less it would read out “K but (Gas Prices) somehow seems more important than…” in which case I would be saying the exact opposite of what I mean.

            The Original version is correct.