• mr_blue@thelemmy.clubBannedOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      If I’m reading your meme correctly, you’re saying his edit basically proves the point of the original meme, right?

      Since the author had to deliberately change “Free Speech” to “Hate Speech” which has nothing to do with my original message, correct?

      • chunk6235@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Lol, we all know who “the author” is.

        Since the author had to deliberately change “Free Speech” to “Hate Speech” what has nothing to do with my original message, correct?

        As is, this meme is just right wing crybully whining. “The author” is clearly trying to conflate their bigotry with free speech and whine when they get called out for their hate speech.

        I see it all the time from right wingers who are completely butthurt because people have started calling them on their bigotry instead of just keeping quiet and letting them spread their brainlet opinions without pushback.

  • Secret_Music@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 day ago

    And guess what, in the ‘real’ world, you would get punched in the face for saying the wrong thing to the wrong person. And if you enter the club and spend your time insulting the owner and all the regulars, a bouncer will throw your ass out into the street and no one will be defending your freeze peach.

    Your consequence free version of ‘free speech’ has never existed and never will. It’s just a fantasy that you basement dwelling 4chan wannabe losers cooked up because you’ve never actually gone out into the real world or interacted with real people. Spoilt, entitled brats.

    You’re free to speak, everyone else is also free to tell you to go fuck yourself. ‘Free speech’ doesn’t mean that everyone should be forced to kiss your ass 100% of the time, regardless of what you say.

  • Lumidaub@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    One of the most important rules of film-making also applies to cartoons: don’t make characters randomly switch sides frame to frame. But of course an AI wouldn’t know that.

      • Lumidaub@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        There are certain irregularities in the lineart that I wouldn’t expect from a human artist, but that’s not hard proof. It’s more the overall style and the font. And of course the fact that I don’t think someone who can draw on this level would break the 180 rule (as explained above) and also change the colour of the sky for no reason, as if they weren’t aware that these two panels are meant to be continuous.

    • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      That makes me think… you could have some pretty awesome comic sequences by gradually moving the ‘camera’ position for each frame.

      I bet that’s been done somewhere

  • erin@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    AI generated, incoherent message, confusing lack of continuity. This certainly is a shit post

  • HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think a lot of these chuds also think free speech means “You have to enable and listen to what I have to say” (ie. freedom of reach).

  • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yes. They both have free speech.

    If you can use your words to have them burned alive, so can they.

    • Pat@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Me neither. Some generic “free speech means you must agree with me” crap.