No one writes this text with a straight face, right? Right?

  • America@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    21 days ago

    Come on, sex workers do their best for little appreciation and many social repercussions. We don’t need to dump on them for the transgressions of the overtly hostile surveillance infrastructure that the internet has become

      • America@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        21 days ago

        Rulecord setting orgy, polyamorule, please get your rule tested afterwards, rule them all to death, suruleveilance state, off the top of my head. 1700 partners is concerning, to be sure.

        • setVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          21 days ago

          1,734 partners is definitely… Questionable. That’s, like, more than my high school’s population when I was a kid. Quite the orgy (rulegy)!

  • wrinkle2409@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    21 days ago

    I wish they could stop being so cynical and at least stop putting “We value your privacy” as the title of cookie consent pop ups. You clearly don’t, otherwise you wouldn’t even be asking me that.

  • safesyrup@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    I find it so funny how they start off with “We value your privacy” and then starting the next line explain how they will anally rape your privacy lol

    • notabot@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      21 days ago

      That wording has been around longer longer than llms have been spitting out gibberish. I suspect it’s just copy and pasted, preserved like some ancient hieroglyphs that no one can decipher, but which must be kept for future study.