Say what you will about AI, it has undoubtedly revolutionized the child porn industry.
:john-goodman-ethos:
“This is the AI men actually use”
I have no doubt that this is actually true. I’m very confident that most AI usage is actually for depraved shit.
I want the heads of these companies to be charged personally for this shit. Zuck should be arrested and charged with distribution of CSAM.
Alright fuck it give me a drop gun I’m gonna do adventures.
I’ll make Luigi look like a fucking puppy dog.
This is the AI men actually use
Hmm. I’m sure that says absolutely nothing about patriarchy’s relationship to child sexual abuse. And I’m sure that since Facebook and Instagram have clearly demonstrated that they aren’t properly dealing with child sexual abuse material on their platforms, that those websites will be put on countries’ blocklists of CSAM websites alongside Reddit and Xitter and the rest, because that’s the right thing to do.
…Oh, none of those websites are blocked in the imperial core? The imperial core is unwilling to apply even the tiniest amount of pressure to the Seppo pedo-companies monopolizing the “new public square”? Jeez, if I didn’t know any better, I’d say all these countries were vassals of Seppoland who benefit immensely from the systemic exploitation of children.
The “vast majority” of ads promoted AI apps made in China,
This reminds me of how in the late 2010s there was a wave of Norwegian pedophiles buying child sex dolls online: dozens of these dolls were seized by customs, some of the arrests were covered in the local news. These dolls were, just like these AI apps, made in China. And you have to feel gross about that, right? Things like child sex dolls and nudify apps are a real response to a real market demand of the extremely lucrative pedophile demographic; and catering to that demand really does contribute to the development of China’s productive forces in the same way as any other market demand that Chinese manufacturers and tech companies cater to. The fact that Chinese companies do cater to pedophiles is a sign of the fact that imperialism is a more primary contradiction of the world than child liberation, i.e. whenever in the future when developing China’s productive forces has become a less pressing matter, that the right circumstances will emerge to shut these horrible operations down for good. But by that point the damage has already been done, right? It goes without saying that I think that it’s horrible that there is a lucrative market for sexually exploiting and victimizing children in the first place, and that I don’t want the world’s biggest and longest-lived extant socialist state to have companies known to further that exploitation. It’s just… amoral. It’s awful.
Cēterum cēnseō iūs auctōris esse dēlendum.Please. Paragraphs.
And let’s just say we still don’t have either an Engels or a Lenin on women liberation with Chinese characteristics.
I’ve noticed sometimes that I write paragraphs that I think are a reasonable length on a computer, but then looking at them on a phone that renders fewer characters in one line, sometimes my paragraphs will look Very long. In any case I’m at least not Fyodor Dostoevsky.
Also,
— but it won’t stay that way forever.
Cēterum cēnseō iūs auctōris esse dēlendum.
Wtf
I remember another time I mentioned on this site how people in China can stream the anime Wataten with Chinese subtitles, Wataten being an anime about a pedophile, and somebody replied “libs were wayy too flattering with the censorship accusations” — so, yeah. As SocialistVibes01 is saying, there isn’t yet an Engels or a Lenin of women’s liberation with Chinese characteristics.
Cēterum cēnseō iūs auctōris esse dēlendum.
I am pleasantly surprised the article does not review the apps in question
These people deserve nothing less than a full public trial with their victims as the judge, jury, and sentencer
The US of Nonce doing nonce things
This is the AI men actually use.
Really fucking cool and good that when chuds are caught being actual removed, it’s framed as something noble.
This framing is probaly meant to normalize it in the minds of the target audience so that they’ll more likely dare to click. I don’t think people say that outside of adds for this content and maybe the consumers of that content trying to reassure themselves.
