Well yeah, a decent chunk of them might be out of a job…maybe the Epstein files could shed some more light that.

How long till we have asylums filled with involuntary commitments?

Party of family values!

More evidence that “pro-life” ends the moment the baby is born for MAGA.

Further entrench impeachment as a meaningless charade if you just bluster and bravado your way through it, castigating your political opponents as monsters persecuting the picture of innocence.

So the majority of Americans, but not the majority of American representatives? Interesting…

Remember, Schumer said at one point that his number one priority was keeping the Democratic Party pro-Israel.

Not the exact quote I was looking for, but many of its cousins: link

It’s not just mistrust of medicine, its rejection of science, reason, and the idea that experts actually know what they’re talking about and aren’t just out to get you. Conservativism is now a cult where the only source of truth is the orange man, and science is only useful for him when it makes his ego feel good.

See that’s the problem. I remember playing this game and having a blast till the final boss, but I can never remember the name and it haunts me. Thanks for the screenshot though. I know I didn’t fever dream it at least.

Oh look at that, they’re writing a strongly worded letter!

I would guess, hoping for the best, that the thinking would be not to dignify him with the platform, somewhat like not naming the criminal in a report so as to not encourage copy cats or false clout. I think some might land there in good faith, but there are times when silence just won’t do.

Stalkflushed? Dunno.

On the thinking though, might there be any legal argument for unreasonable search and seizure? Yes there’s not expectation of privacy in public, but an officer might still be expected to have a warrant or at least probable cause before searching my car in a Walmart parking lot without my consent.

Sure I don’t expect privacy from Walmart’s security system, but I don’t have reason to think law enforcement is monitoring it at all times. 24/7 law enforcement surveillance seems like it should fall under “search” there, because unless you have reason to be watching me, you’re searching for something anyway.

And officers have literally been caught literally stalking people without warrant with these systems. How is that not unreasonable search?

So yes, there’s no expectation that the public should look the other way, but I should be able to expect to not have big brother looking over my shoulder at all times.

Of course he’s lying…and delusional…and losing his grip on reality…But still, the one who wouldn’t stop crowing about voter fraud openly bragging about committing election interference (whether real in its effects or not) should be cause for alarm…

No worries, better to be cautious and not trust by default in the current climate.

Oh dear… *commences sycophancy routine

You’ve made some excellent points highlighting how common and needed encryption is. Which also highlights how important it is to defend the right to encryption from government overreach.

A key under the mat for the cops is a key under the mat for the neredowells as well. Which also begs the question, how comfortable are with the cops showing up in your living room uninvited?

Came here to say that, but I like your version better. Inconceivable!

Miss Frizzle is a time lady and the magic school bus is a tardis.

Fair enough. Establishment democrats are America’s left, but in any other country they would be center right.

Establishment democrats would definitely fit.