• rhacer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    138
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    But it IS how we see prices. If there weren’t science behind it, they wouldn’t be doing it.

          • Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            25
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            The CEO decided that clients were smart intelligent people and treated people as adults. Aka, no discounts, no 99 pricing, it just costs what it costs, as low as we can make it, plus our margin.

            JC Penny was already not too well, this helped sink them

            • TehWorld@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              21
              ·
              3 months ago

              It was less about the .99 pricing and more about “Sale” pricing and ‘coupons’. Retailers will put a pair of pants on “Sale” for 50% off 51 weeks out of the year and people think they’re getting a great deal whereas when it’s not half off, they just don’t buy.

            • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              3 months ago

              Poor guy. Tried to do some good in the world and paid the price for it. Nobody ever went broke overestimating the stupidity of the average person.

              • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                3 months ago

                “Why would I pay $25 for these pair of pants at full price when I could pay $24.99 for those [identical] pants that are half off?! Clearly, that’s the better deal!”

                Hell, could probably even make it $29.99 for the identical pants and people will still go with that because they think they’re paying five more bucks and getting a $60 pair of pants

          • SuperEars@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            This doesn’t meet the bar you want, but my marketing professor called the .99 idea the single greatest thing to come out of marketing in a century.

            • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Sounds about right.

              Marketing hasn’t done anything positive for humanity. It is all just to manipulate people into buying shit they don’t need. It is the main driver for the overconsumption.

      • BakerBagel@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        I was watching a PBS documentary about the first humans in the Americas. All the scientists are super cool until you get to the American anthropologist who starts using phrenology to explain why Native American tribes shouldn’t be given repatriation rights, only for a Danish geneticist to say “yeah, this is absolutely a Native American and i am willing to testify to that in any court of law”

        Pseudoscience is still all the rage if it can be used to push a political agenda.

    • hsdkfr734r@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      But it IS how we see prices.

      I don’t. Never did. I’m sure I’m not the only one.

      • skizzles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Same, I’ve always just rounded up. Even when it comes to things like .50¢ I still just round it up to the next dollar.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        You do though

        At some level you will favor the 19.99. You might justify it with some other rational but there will be the bias.

        • hsdkfr734r@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          No, I dont though.

          It really depends on the study you choose to believe into. (No, everyone does it, isn’t a pro argument. People always had strange beliefs which later changed. I think it’s called major consensus narrative or maybe consensus reality

          I like this hill, I’ll stay here. Thank you.)

      • moonbunny@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        This reminds me of my early shopping days using EBay, where it wasn’t uncommon for sellers to under-price their products so they show up near the top of the price (cheapest-most expensive) sort pile, and then charge an outrageous amount in shipping.

        I’ve found that almost always (at the time), that the seller offering free or low cost shipping was usually cheaper.

    • Mercuri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Part of it is that there’s less hidden costs. I like it when it’s just “the total is $30” instead of “there’s $8 shipping and a $2 service fee and then $4 in taxes and…”

      I’ve also seen some online stores lure in a customer with a really cheap initial price and then on the last page just slam them with insane shipping and handling fees hoping that the customer either doesn’t notice or feels too invested at this point to cancel their purchase.

      But yes, part of it is also people are stupid when they see the word “free” as if the store wouldn’t move the cost somewhere else.

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      That at least allows you to retrieve the full amount if you return the goods. Shipping costs you don’t get back.

    • Jackthelad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t understand people who won’t pay £5 for shipping, but will instead spend another £15 on something they don’t need so they get free shipping.

      All you’ve done is lost money.

  • gerryflap@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    3 months ago

    Honestly, however much I want to pretend to be better than that, I think it does work on me. Obviously not on a conscious level, I know how numbers work, but some part of my monkey brain sees the 1 instead of the 2 and therefore concludes that it must be way cheaper. It’s a feeling that no amount of facts is going to disable. And in the end many purchasing decisions aren’t based on a full analysis but on feelings.

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      please tip

      I’ve actually started carrying cash again for the first time in 20 years because I’m sick of every fucking POS machine in the world asking for tips. Yes, I can choose not to tip, but there’s an emotional cost associated with that decision. There’s a cost associated with just seeing the option instead of being able to simply pay for my item and go about my day.

  • volvoxvsmarla @lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 months ago

    My husband is awful in that regard. He sees the first digit only and then rounds it down. “It’s just 30€” - it’s 39,99€. “It’s like 200€” - it’s 289,90€, “5000€” - 5999€. I love him to pieces but I don’t trust any of his numbers.

  • BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 months ago

    These dumbasses thinks this works on us smart people. Anyway, gotta go fight some people on black friday for shit i don’t even need nor afford

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      The only thing that I ever go for on black Friday is software. A lot of software is actually legitimately cheaper on black Friday sales.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          No, ham radio deluxe, Topaz Labs, phrase Express, on Black Friday they’re half their normal price, if you come back in February it is twice the price that it is on Black Friday. Software companies are a special case. While it takes a lot of money and or effort to make their product, minting that product is particularly cheap. Same concept for steam sales. The real advantage is selling the product very cheaply a couple of days a year gets it out in the public more and they end up with more word of mouth sales.

  • OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 months ago

    From my experience working in retail I’ve seen people say out loud something like “oh, it’s only 4 dollars!” When the sticker says $4.99. This shit apparently works on a lot of people for some reason.

  • Ragdoll X@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I always round up the price when I see $X.99 but my grandmother always rounds it down and it pisses me off

    They’re trying to fool you! Don’t be a sheep!!!

    • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      I always round way up because sales tax is so high here. 17.99 = $20. I’m usually within the $1 range when I check out.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 months ago

    It does work believe it or not. It is something that plays to your subconscious. You will favor the slightly cheaper option even if you aren’t aware of it.

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I learned all about this in “thinking fast and slow” by Daniel Kahneman. He talks about system 1 and system 2, where system 1 is your kind of knee-jerk reaction to a thing (thinking fast), and system 2 is the contemplative and careful consideration of a thing (thinking slow).

      I would argue that some people overly leverage system 1 (thinking fast) because it’s generally easier, and takes less time and mental effort to do. Those that either can’t, or are unwilling to engage system 2 in their day to day activities, will 100% fall for these kinds of misleading prices, since system 1 is cutting so many corners so that it can be fast and efficient (mostly on how much energy is used), that it skips a lot of the cognitive steps and goes right to the (often incorrect) conclusion. That $19.99 is $19 (or $10 in some cases).

      In the book, they discuss that system 1 often gives the wrong information that is later rejected by system 2 when further consideration is given to a particular input/stimulus.

      If someone isn’t engaging system 2 as a check to ensure system 1 isn’t lying to them, then shit like $19.99 seems cheaper than $20. It doesn’t hold up to any scrutiny, but they’re not targeting thoughtful people with these practices. For thoughtful people, there’s functionally no difference between $19.99 and $20.

      Yes, the difference is one cent, but given that one cent is so worthless in today’s society, to the point that Canada stopped making one cent coins (and other countries have done so as well), there’s functionally no difference between the prices.

      One cent is only worth anything if it is combined with many other cents. The sum of those pennies becomes valuable when you conglomerate enough of them.

    • shneancy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      not just cheaper though

      even subconsciously $15.55 will not be that better than $15.56

      but in a change from $20 to $19.99 the whole first number is smaller, and that gives our ape brains the feeling that it’s not as expensive

      to reveal the vibes your brain operates on, think about bigger numbers. Imagine yourself to be in kind of a rush, you want to buy something, but family is waiting, or you need to walk your dog, or maybe you’re doing shopping before work, regular life stuff,

      first scenario

      an identical item is sold for $2920 in the first store you visit, and for $2970 in the second store you visit. The stores are an inconvenient travel time away from each other. Do you go back to the first store?

      second scenario

      now, an identical item is sold for $2975 in the first store you visit, and for $3025 in the second store you visit. The stores are still an inconvenient travel time away from each other. Do you go back to the first store?

      though the difference is still $50, the jump from $2975 to $3025 feels more significant than $2920 to $2970. And obviously many of us will go back to get the cheaper option in both cases, but there’s a lot of people on this planet who have money to spare but not the time, and a lot of other circumstances too, marketing people know it and will do their damnest to sway you to buy their product

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 months ago

    I generally round up to nearest bigger number or close to that. $19.99 is $20. $23.99 would probably be $25. $180 would just be $200.

    No real rhyme or reason, just the bigger the number the more I fudge the “real” price upwards thanks to sales tax and a “can I really afford this?” factor.

  • Sixty@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 months ago

    The amount of times I’ve watched Youtubers say something like “35 dollars” while showing an image that shows the price as $35.96 happens too often for me to side with OP lol, sorry.

    • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      That is honestly insane.

      In NZ the sticker price is what you pay, if the price on the sticker doesn’t include tax, it is false advertising and you pay what is on the sticker.

      It is entirely up to the retailer to ensure that the price is correct. The only exception to this, is if the price is obviously wrong e.g. $5.00 rather than $500.