Kentucky dispatchers repeatedly told police officers the address of a house they were supposed to raid over an alleged stolen Weed Eater, only for the cops to raid the wrong home and kill the man inside.

But the man who police say admitted to stealing the Weed Eater from a home of a local judge had already been in custody prior to the deadly raid that took place minutes before midnight last month, according to WLEX. That man told police he had stored the stolen Weed Eater at a home at 489 Vanzant Road which is a rural area outside of London city limits.

  • Snowclone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    ·
    3 months ago

    Check to see if there’s a development looking to buy all the land in that area. You know. Like the last time police did this, and it got buried for years until public outcry made the legal system reluctantly look into and find out there were very rich people who wanted the home of Brianna Taylor, and got it for what $1.00 after she was murdered in her bed by a cop who snuck behind the house to her bedroom and opened fire.

  • mantra@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    3 months ago

    Why the fuck do they need to raid any house for a fucking weed eater!? That is serious small time shit.

    • jaybone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      3 months ago

      And the thief was already in custody. He had “stored” the weed eater at the address they were supposed to be searching (er, raiding), meaning whoever would have been present there wasn’t even the thief.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      3 months ago

      Because we train cops to kill and give them military surplus and they’re just itching to use it.

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      The whole raid and SWAT tactics are insanely ineffective and deadly. Before that detectives would just come by in the day time and knock and be like ‘we have a warrant’.

  • i_dont_want_to@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    3 months ago

    They broke into his house, and he got a gun out. Which is one of the few times it is reasonable to brandish a weapon… And they use that as justification to kill him. Over a weed eater.

    The police don’t give a shit if someone steals your catalytic converter, your whole car, or all of your tools. But I guess if you’re a judge they will kill for your weed eater.

  • dalekcaan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    3 months ago

    stealing the Weed Eater from a home of a local judge

    Aha, so that’s why they suddenly give a shit about property theft, because it was from a member of their little club.

  • fuzzyspudkiss@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    3 months ago

    So police get to kill anyone over anything with the word ‘weed’ now? I can’t think of any other reason to raid the home for a fucking $300 item.

    • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It belonged to a judge so they sent a death squad after it, and cops are so fucking stupid they didn’t realize the thief was already in custody. It’s either that simple or they wanted this man dead for another reason.

  • Dorkyd68@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    3 months ago

    There is more to this story that we will never know. You raid a home over a stolen fucking weed eater. Gross abuse of power by someone

    • Subverb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      3 months ago

      No, it’s right there in the story. The weed eater belonged to a judge, so obviously someone’s gonna pay.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      Even if it was the correct home. They killed the guy over a fucking weed eater. Even if he’d been violent back off and fucking let things cool down. Grab him when he goes for groceries or something. Fuck.

    • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I mean, the article plainly says that the weed eater belonged to a local judge.

      This dude wasn’t executed because of what he was accused of stealing. He was executed because of who he was accused of stealing it from.

      I can almost guarantee that some police higher-up is getting a free/cheap piece of “forfeited” property in the coming weeks.

    • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 months ago

      Why did they even do anything? Whenever something is stolen from I get told there is nothing they can do but take a report.

    • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Ah, but the weed eater belonged to a judge. It wasn’t because he stole something valuable; It was because he stole from someone important.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    “Oh don’t like the cops? I guess the next time you’re in trouble you’ll call a crackhead?”

    That does seem to have a better survival rate

  • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    This is a repeat post, so I’ll repeat one of my replies partially: I wouldn’t be surprised if a suddenly vacant lot wouldn’t suddenly be auctioned off to a cop’s relative in areas with a high predominance of this. Read up on civil asset forfeiture as well. In some places, cops are basically legalized mafias.