• theplan@tucson.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    I see this going very poorly very quickly. I don’t know how much longer we’re going to have a France after this, but I’m interested in seeing how this unfolds.

    • Diabolo96@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      The protests are for police brutality against Minorities. Apparently the shot 17 years old kid was repeatedly hit with back of the gun which made him moves his leg away from the breaks and since it’s an automatic the car started moving forward…the rest is history.

  • lokitkhemak@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    This will definitely not be misused by anyone in the government. How on the earth did such blatantly dystopian law get passed?

  • lntl@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    At least it’s happening out in the open? Other states do this without parlimentary or congressional approval.

    • Munrock ☭@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Interestingly enough I went to a lecture by a Chinese lawmaker yesterday who said the exact same thing. When it’s codified in law, you know what they can and can’t do, and what they can and can’t use in court against you. When governments just do it covertly and subvert due process, your right to privacy suffers a lot more. She didn’t have to point out what Snowden uncovered about the NSA for everyone to know what she was referring to.

      • ShotLine@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        A little confused. Regardless of whats legal we know what they ‘can’ do, just not whether its legal or not. What we lose by legalising it is precisely that it can be used in court as legitimate evidence.

        Currently in the US everyone knows they have far less privacy from the government, or from corporations for that matter, but ill gotten info cant easily be uses in court.

        IMO the really scary thing is that now the government is just buying info from data brokers where the users technically consented in some app’s TOS then using that. Its legally cleaner, and honestly probably better than info they could’ve gotten from from shadier methods.

  • Dr_Toofing@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    The article does not mention, how will this be achieved technology wise? I don’t know of any universal way that a government might activate these features on a person’s phone. Unless network operators/phone manufacturers start installing backdoors. This does not bode well.

  • beard__hunter@lemmy.fmhy.mlB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I am Indian. Even our douche bag of politicians will think twice before passing such legislation. Of course they will spy illegally on us but they won’t pass such obvious fascist legislation.