• Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 days ago

    Didn’t like a judge intervene to make this deal happen? Can we get that dumbass judge’s face plastered over this deal?

  • kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Headline makes her sound petty, when she’s actually the most important anti-monopoly figure of the past 40 years

    • baatliwala@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      38
      ·
      2 days ago

      You miss her hilarious incompetence? Don’t Americans get enough of that with their President already?

      • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Wdym? The regulators under Biden were pretty aggressive with antitrust investigations, which pissed off the right and oligarchs and decided to throw their support to have Trump return to deregulate.

        • baatliwala@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          2 days ago

          Aggressive != being actually good at your job. She lost the MS case so badly it was straight up embarrassing for the FTC

          • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            I haven’t paid much attention to FTC prosecution under Biden, but I can see what you mean. Prosecutors tend to build up their cases however slow. Maybe she hadn’t done her due diligence on this regard.

    • TemplaerDude@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      2 days ago

      The cost of ultimate over the course of a year can get you multiple games that’s you’ll actually finish as opposed to a library of titles you’ll just graze.

      • Goodeye8@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        And a few years back you could get the same deal for half the price and in a few years it’s going to cost even more. You’re getting slow boiled because you’re thinking “I’m still getting a good deal”. You’re getting a good deal until you’re no longer getting a good deal and then what? Best case scenario you simply won’t have any of the games you paid to play. Worst case (if Game pass becomes successful enough) gaming is fucked because it’ll become streaming services 2.0 where you have to have 4 different subscriptions active just to play the games you want to play, and good luck trying to buy games when they’ve been priced into high heavens just to make the subscriptions seem reasonably priced (MS already tested that with Outer Worlds 2).

        Doesn’t matter how good Game pass was or is, it’s a poisoned chalice and it will irreversibly fuck up gaming if people continue using it.

        • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          For me, I still have many many many many games from the past I didnt play, many of which can be acquired through the high seas completely guilt free. Not culpability free, mind you, because the law is a bitch, but its not like im going to be picking up a brand new copy of Diddy Kong Racing(N64) anywhere ever.

          If I need a modern multiplayer game to play with friends and not be a complete loner, theres no shortage of free-to-play games.

      • StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Maybe for others but not for me. I forgot I had it for three months. Using it pretty much only for mineraft and expedition 33. Right now I’m playing alien isolation and mtga. I don’t play enough games

        • Nasan@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Forgot I’ve had it for a year but ended up buying expedition 33 on steam. I used the price hike as an excuse for cancelling it finally.

  • rollerbang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    The sad thing is that nowhere near enough people will cancel their subs to offset the price increase.

  • commander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 days ago

    I remember how much games media was hyped on the activision acquisition. It’s probably because Kotick and Blizzard execs are a bunch of bastards but that doesn’t make MS execs great. Just less shitty. Also had the feeling like games media at the time saw it as strengthening western games studio employment stability. Things have not gone as hoped for in the last few years

    • baines@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      lmao on anyone that was dumb enough to think this was going to be a positive outcome

      at least it was two shit AAA game companies and not another great indie dev getting absorbed

      • RogueBanana@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        If a great indie dev gets absorbed then it will cease being great. Mergers by these souls corps are almost always bad for everyone except the execs and shareholders.

      • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Well, they still drag around the name Blizzard despite buying it and beating it into a pulp. That still makes me salty everytime I see an article with Activision-Blizzard. Anyone who thinks they can buy reputation is a sociopath.

    • 9limmer@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      2 days ago

      Implying that consolidation gives them much more leverage to do whatever they like with more detrimental outcomes for the industry and users.

      • Cyberspark@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        Not really. Sub numbers have been falling for a while, game pass value has always been borderline for devs and value hasn’t been increasing that well for gamers. Game pass doesn’t give dlc access, it doesn’t give big enough incentives to buy on the Xbox store.

        If they started doing exclusives I’d be a little concerned, but I’m sure they know that would just hurt their already bad numbers.

        Right now Visa, Mastercard and Steam are the bigger problems right now. And Steam just because their bubble is popping, their lack of guards has started to be exploited, which is going to mean they’re going to be implementing changes that are bad for everyone, but necessary.

        • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          They do exclusive day one releases I believe. Or is it just that they are free on gamepass but cost money on other platforms? Im thinking of starfield possibly?

    • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      Microsoft sold the acquisition as good for consumers. Now they’re doubling the price of GamePass.

      Cue Jack’s lack of surprise, or however the Fight Club meme goes.

      • Default_Defect@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Maybe the FTC should have tried something better than “But what about poor Sony??” as an argument against the acquisition, then.