So, it seems like PieFed is becoming a real alternative to lemmy.
What are the differences between these two? From a tech perspective, and also morality/ethics, if you want. Any differences in vision for these services?
Say whatever is on your mind. I want to know.
On which one should we put our weight?
PieFed all the way. It’s developing at lightning speed, while Lemmy lags behind as the transphobic genocide denying devs beg for donations with in built donation begging banners on all Lemmy instances front pages. Instances are apparently scared to defed from .ml for fear the devs wont support them with help.
Rimu has made some interesting choices, such as blocking 196 from default federating posts until a user subs first or a dislike for meme subs. But when spoken to has been receptive and removed such things or made them optional for admins.
Ethically and feature wise PieFed is in the lead, its not perfect but its open to change and receptive to ideas
I know this question isn’t really posed to us, but nobody should use fash software whenever possible. Software built on an explicitly anti-communist foundation, like Piefed, are equivalent to me and something I will not use.
The day they defederate lemmy.ml is the day they have officially built Reddit 2.0 but might even be worse due to their insistence that they’re somehow different.
The inability of the average shitlib to even entertain the ideas of those outside of the echo chamber of hegemonic global liberalism is so interesting.
Almost the entirety of the old media and basically every non specifically counter educated person in the western world catering to them isn’t enough, they feel compelled to just completely isolate themselves.
Liberals know there is a lie within liberalism and that keeping that lie contained is necessary for its survival. Any socialist within liberal spaces creates more socialists. There are only two historically successful ways to stop this reddening over time, one is social democracy and the other is mass murder of communists.
I think you’re right on a systemic level however are being far too generous to the analytical capabilities of your average shitlib on an individual scale.
I think liberalism being at its core an idealist and moralist philosophy means that when you are born into it the saturation of propaganda makes it almost morally necessary to believe anyone who disagrees with you is ontologically evil/immoral because if they’re not then you must be. Its the harry potter/star wars effect, every political disagreement etc. must be good vs evil, the hero vs the villain and everyone want to believe they are the good.
That effect is real except it’s the other way around and they are indeed on the bad side. It is all dialectical.
Waiter waiter another plate of dialectics please!

Voat 2.0
@edie@lemmy.encryptionin.space was looking at PieFed code the other week, and I ended up taking a look at it too. Its great fun to sneak a peak at.
For example, you can not cast a vote on PieFed if you’ve made 0 replies, 0 posts, AND your username is 8 characters long:
def cannot_vote(self): if self.is_local(): return False return self.post_count == 0 and self.post_reply_count == 0 and len( self.user_name) == 8 # most vote manipulation bots have 8 character user names and never post any contentIf a reply is created, from anywhere, that only contains the word “this”, the comment is dropped (CW: ableism in the function name):
def reply_is_stupid(body) -> bool: lower_body = body.lower().strip() if lower_body == 'this' or lower_body == 'this.' or lower_body == 'this!': return True return FalseEvery user (remote or local) has an “attitude” which is calculated as follows:
(upvotes cast - downvotes cast) / (upvotes + downvotes). If your “attitude” is < 0.0 you can’t downvote.Every account has a Social Credit Score, aka your Reputation. If your account has less than 100 reputation and is newly created, you are not considered “trustworthy” and there are limitations placed on what your account can do. Your reputation is calculated as
upvotes earned - downvotes earnedaka Reddit Karma. If your reputation is at -10 you also cannot downvote, and you can’t create new DMs. It also flags your account automatically if your reputation is to low:
PieFed boasts that it has “4chan image detection”. Let’s see how that works in practice:
if site.enable_chan_image_filter: # Do not allow fascist meme content try: if '.avif' in uploaded_file.filename: import pillow_avif # NOQA image_text = pytesseract.image_to_string(Image.open(BytesIO(uploaded_file.read())).convert('L')) except FileNotFoundError: image_text = '' except UnidentifiedImageError: image_text = '' if 'Anonymous' in image_text and ( 'No.' in image_text or ' N0' in image_text): # chan posts usually contain the text 'Anonymous' and ' No.12345' self.image_file.errors.append( "This image is an invalid file type.") # deliberately misleading error message current_user.reputation -= 1 db.session.commit() return FalseYup. If your image contains the word
Anonymous, and contains the textNo.orN0it will reject the image with a fake error message. Not only does it give you a fake error, but it also will dock your Social Credit Score. Take note of thecurrent_user.reputation -= 1PieFed also boasts that it has AI generated text detection. Let’s see how that also works in practice:
# LLM Detection if reply.body and '—' in reply.body and user.created_very_recently(): # usage of em-dash is highly suspect. from app.utils import notify_admin # notify adminThis is the default detection, apparently you can use an API endpoint for that detection as well apparently, but it’s not documented anywhere but within the code.
Do you want to leave a comment that is just a funny gif? No you don’t. Not on PieFed, that will get your comment dropped and lower your Social Credit Score!
if reply_is_just_link_to_gif_reaction(reply.body) and site.enable_gif_reply_rep_decrease: user.reputation -= 1 raise PostReplyValidationError(_('Gif comment ignored'))How does it know its just a gif though?
def reply_is_just_link_to_gif_reaction(body) -> bool: tmp_body = body.strip() if tmp_body.startswith('https://media.tenor.com/') or \ tmp_body.startswith('https://media1.tenor.com/') or \ tmp_body.startswith('https://media2.tenor.com/') or \ tmp_body.startswith('https://media3.tenor.com/') or \ tmp_body.startswith('https://i.giphy.com/') or \ tmp_body.startswith('https://i.imgflip.com/') or \ tmp_body.startswith('https://media1.giphy.com/') or \ tmp_body.startswith('https://media2.giphy.com/') or \ tmp_body.startswith('https://media3.giphy.com/') or \ tmp_body.startswith('https://media4.giphy.com/'): return True else: return FalseI’m not even sure someone would actually drop a link like this directly into a comment. It’s not even taking into consideration whether those URLs are part of a markdown image tag.
As Edie mentioned, if someone has a user blocked, and that user replies to someone, their comment is dropped:
if parent_comment.author.has_blocked_user(user.id) or parent_comment.author.has_blocked_instance(user.instance_id): log_incoming_ap(id, APLOG_CREATE, APLOG_FAILURE, saved_json, 'Parent comment author blocked replier') return NoneFor Example:
- Cowbees comment on lemmy.ml: https://lemmy.ml/post/41587312/23288779
- Non-existent on piefed.social: https://piefed.social/comment/9647830
(see Edies original comment here)
More from Edie:
Also add if the poster has blocked you! It is exactly as nonsense as you think.
Example:
I made a post in testing@piefed.social from my account testingpiefed@piefed.social, replied to it from my other testingpiefed@piefed.zip account. Since the .social account has blocked the .zip, it doesn’t show up on .social, nor on e.g. piefed.europe.pub.
I then made a comment from my lemmy.ml account, and replied to it from my piefed.zip account, and neither .social, nor europe.pub can see my .zip reply, but can see my lemmy.ml comment!
But wait! There’s More!
- PieFed defederates from Hexbear.net, Lemmygrad.ml, and Lemmy.ml out of the box.
- The “rational discourse” sidebar that you see on the main instance is hard coded into the system.
- Moderators of a community can kick you from a community, which unsubscribes you from it, and does not notify you.
- I was going to say that Admins had the ability to add a weight to votes coming from other instances, but the videos that showed this are now gone, and as of v1.5.0 they have removed the instance vote weight feature, claiming it was “unused”.
All this to say. Piefed is a silly place, and no one should bother using its software.
mmmm delicious software slop. thank you
A rare treat!
∞🏳️⚧️Edie [it/it/its/its/itself, she/her/her/hers/herself, fae/faer/faer/faers/faerself, love/love/loves/loves/loveself, des/pair, null/void, none/use name]@lemmy.encryptionin.space
21·6 days agoIf your account has less than 100 reputation, you are not considered “trustworthy”
I actually misread on that, it also has to be a newly created account.
ⓘ This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.
I’ve made the correction. I missed that too somehow.
∞🏳️⚧️Edie [it/it/its/its/itself, she/her/her/hers/herself, fae/faer/faer/faers/faerself, love/love/loves/loves/loveself, des/pair, null/void, none/use name]@lemmy.encryptionin.space
15·6 days agoAlso add if the poster has blocked you! It is exactly as nonsense as you think.
Example:
I made a post in testing@piefed.social from my account testingpiefed@piefed.social, replied to it from my other testingpiefed@piefed.zip account. Since the .social account has blocked the .zip, it doesn’t show up on .social, nor on e.g. piefed.europe.pub.
I then made a comment from my lemmy.ml account, and replied to it from my piefed.zip account, and neither .social, nor europe.pub can see that .zip reply, but can see my lemmy.ml comment!
Edit: here is the post on dbzer0, also can’t see any .zip comments
ⓘ This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.
🥴
Ok, so if you block a person, it enforces that block for other users and even logged off users. Meaning, if me and you had a beef. I could block you, and then talk shit about you openly, and if you wanted to reply to me, you could, but it would then drop the comment and no one on my instance would see it, and no one on other instances would see it, unless you were on say, a Lemmy instance?
edit: sorry I had to rewrite that like twice because it’s so fucking confusing.
∞🏳️⚧️Edie [it/it/its/its/itself, she/her/her/hers/herself, fae/faer/faer/faers/faerself, love/love/loves/loves/loveself, des/pair, null/void, none/use name]@lemmy.encryptionin.space
10·6 days agoSo, what I’m talking about here is this code:
if post.author.has_blocked_user(user.id) or post.author.has_blocked_instance(user.instance_id): log_incoming_ap(id, APLOG_CREATE, APLOG_FAILURE, saved_json, 'Post author blocked replier') return NoneWhere if the author of the post you are making a comment on has blocked you, the comment is dropped.
no one on your instance would see it
No. People on your own instance will always be able to see your comments, even if people on the piefed instance can’t.
And the reason why piefed.europe.pub cannot see the comment from my piefed.zip account is that the testing community is on piefed.social, and it doesn’t announce the comment to other instances. I think the reason why lemmy.ml can still see the comment is because piefed.zip sent it directly to lemmy.ml? But I don’t really know.
Edit: I see you edited it. My reply is still more or less correct even with the edit. I will add, that being lemmy instance isn’t going to fix it, it’s still the piefed instance’s (the instance the community is on) job to federate the comment. And if you were talking on a community not on your instance, so my reply wouldn’t be dropped by the community’s instance, every other instance except yours would know of my comments.
ⓘ This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.
if i’m on piefed god forbid, and i reply to a comment on an OP who has blocked me, will my own instance reject my comment? will it give me an error or will it silently drop it or what?
∞🏳️⚧️Edie [it/it/its/its/itself, she/her/her/hers/herself, fae/faer/faer/faers/faerself, love/love/loves/loves/loveself, des/pair, null/void, none/use name]@lemmy.encryptionin.space
8·6 days agoI completely misread your comment.
If you are on the same instance as the blocker, you will get this error message: “Your reply was not accepted because The author of the parent post has blocked the author or instance of the new reply.”
ⓘ This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.
∞🏳️⚧️Edie [it/it/its/its/itself, she/her/her/hers/herself, fae/faer/faer/faers/faerself, love/love/loves/loves/loveself, des/pair, null/void, none/use name]@lemmy.encryptionin.space
6·6 days agoIf you on lemmygrad.ml reply to a comment on a post where the OP has blocked you (no matter if you reply directly to the post or to another comment), you will think that the reply has gone through, it will show on lemmygrad.ml.
If the community the post is in, is on the same instance as the OP who has blocked you, the OP’s instance and other instances e.g. lemmy.ml will not see the comment. If the community is not on the same instance as the OP, other instances will see it, only the OP’s instance won’t.
(This is at least how I understand it, if I’m wrong I really hope someone will correct me)
ⓘ This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.
I think I figured it out. Look at process_new_content. If the content is blocked, it sends a deleted to remote instances, I think when the content isn’t allowed. Check this commit: https://codeberg.org/rimu/pyfedi/commit/ed7169b40c2b9ac0ae546d9badea45bbe57bcec5
∞🏳️⚧️Edie [it/it/its/its/itself, she/her/her/hers/herself, fae/faer/faer/faers/faerself, love/love/loves/loves/loveself, des/pair, null/void, none/use name]@lemmy.encryptionin.space
8·6 days agoI see, that commit was made just a week ago, after I looked at the code.
Edit: Also it’s only on main, and doesn’t seem to have been added to a release yet
Edit: Ah, no, the 2170 / 2176 line was there before
Edit: NO, it was added a week ago: https://codeberg.org/rimu/pyfedi/commit/6b692c3beec7b427494708b3ad55c30875e94f7d
ⓘ This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.
wow this is bad. I need to look through the piefed repo. This shit is pure comedic gold even if super toxic in practice. Is this software entirely vibe coded by neolib ideologues?
Is this software entirely vibe coded by neolib ideologues?
I feel like it has to be. Lack of good coding practices, like hardcoding all those is_it_a_gif strings, screams vibe coded to me. You couldn’t get away with this stuff in a 200 level coding class. You know what, vibe coding is a good programming equivalent to libs: all substance with no foundations.
Yes it is, far as I’m aware.
Am I reading this correctly, that if you have no defederated instances it falls back to defederating hexbear/ml/grad?
defed_list = BannedInstances.query.filter(or_(BannedInstances.domain == 'hexbear.net', BannedInstances.domain == 'lemmygrad.ml', BannedInstances.domain == 'hilariouschaos.com', BannedInstances.domain == 'lemmy.ml')).order_by(BannedInstances.domain).all()Pretty amusing that there’s apparently no thought to abstraction, just a bunch of brain genius “feature” additions strung together.
Absolutely zero abstraction to be found.
well that’d create hierarchies
Someone in a different release thread was going on about how piefed just made up its own federation return ignoring standards
Found it
https://lemmy.world/comment/21179968
Edit, for those getting wrong thread comment in question
It’s this kind of thinig that makes me think of PieFed as just a pile of hacks with no serious consideration for the Fediverse
Designating which comment is an answer involves federating a new Activity:
{ "id": "https://piefed.social/activities/answer/hgb4iO4b8UAFRTn", "type": "ChooseAnswer", "actor": "https://piefed.socialz/u/rimu", "object": "https://piefed.ngrok.app/comment/224", "@context": ["https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams", "https://w3id.org/security/v1"], "audience": "https://crust.piefed.social/c/linux_questions", "to": ["https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams#Public"], "cc": ["https://crust.piefed.social/c/linux_questions"] }There are at least three different ways to implement this in a way compatible with ActivityPub:
- Send an “as:accept” activity with the comment as the object.
- Add an attribute for the comment indicating that it has been selected.
- Create a collection for chosen answers, add to the post object.
And even if this type of new activity was a necessity, they could add their own extensions via a proper JSON-LD context definition. But they completely disregard JSON-LD, which means that they expect other servers to either (1) adopt their ad-hoc vocabulary or (2) ignore it completely and keep this idea that “Only PieFed has these features”.
lmao of course they aren’t even implementing the underlying protocol properly.
edit: lmao that whole thread is good entertainment.
In fairness the underlying protocol is fairly shit
I’m seeing mamdami comments?
Not a fediverse thread on piefed update?
Jerboa seems to be handling the link badly, but voyager linked correctly.
Just making sure as earlier did mess up the url when writing up the comment.
I think that might be at least what happens on initial load. If you never change it, that’s what it is. I could be wront though.
It is called each time site_instance_chooser_view is run, and if the filter returns empty it uses that list it seems.
Nice. So what, do you have to put a fake instance in to get around it? Or just have lemmynsfw as a recommended default first defederated instance to bypass it?
I skimmed this on my phone so it’s tough to look over the whole codebase, but yes it seems like to be 100% federated you need to have a dummy instance you are defederated from? If I have time this week I might scan the codebase and see how it’s actually called.
Linking to top of a comment thread that yes started with a terrible username. But it boiled down to people bringing up some of these concerns to people trying to say ml is super censorship
Then a piefed cheerleader(spokesperson?) who tries to make everyone’s concerns just a sign they’re misunderstanding what piefed does.
~~https://lemmy.ml/comment/2338226~~
https://lemmy.ml/comment/23382263
Correct link, I accidentally removed the 3
My god cowbee is a saint
Ikr! I’m just amazed I replied longer to the same user.
Oh sorry I didn’t mean to leave you out! You’ve both got waaaaay more patience than I do
Nah all praise to cowbee!
I think this is the wrong thread?
Yeah I accidentally removed a number at the end, edited post.
https://lemmy.ml/post/41773598/23384239
And where other user started to explain why it’s okay if it doesn’t even let the person know it doesn’t leave a comment. Because it shows in piefed…
At this point wonder if the attitude they have even works properly if voting outside of piefed
∞🏳️⚧️Edie [it/it/its/its/itself, she/her/her/hers/herself, fae/faer/faer/faers/faerself, love/love/loves/loves/loveself, des/pair, null/void, none/use name]@lemmy.encryptionin.space
8·6 days agoBecause it shows in piefed…
(Only locally, federated piefed instances can reply to blockers just fine)
ⓘ This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.
https://lemmy.ml/comment/23390349

As I said initially, if every instance was Piefed - you wouldn’t be able to reply in the first place to someone who has blocked you. Whilst that interpretation of blocking could be disagreeable, it’s not what I consider ‘shadowbanning’ as you’re being directly blocked from interacting.
∞🏳️⚧️Edie [it/it/its/its/itself, she/her/her/hers/herself, fae/faer/faer/faers/faerself, love/love/loves/loves/loveself, des/pair, null/void, none/use name]@lemmy.encryptionin.space
9·6 days agoWhich AFAICT incorrect as it is right now. Unless I somehow managed to create a bug where I can reply from one piefed account to another which has the first blocked.
ⓘ This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.
You haven’t created a bug, and you have it correct. If a Piefed user blocks a remote Piefed user, and that remote Piefed user attempts to reply to them in the UI this is what happens:
- UI shows reply button regardless of block status (no template check)
- Local routes check
in_reply_to.author.has_blocked_user(current_user.id); fails if block known locally. - User blocks are not federated by PieFed, so local instance often unaware
- If block unknown locally, reply is created and federated
- Remote instance (where block exists) rejects reply via
create_post_replycheck, may sendDeleteactivity back - Creates “ghost reply” scenario: appears locally but not on remote instance
Piefed has no means of federating blocks. In fact, they have some TODOs to actually implement federated blocks:
- No sending code:
app/user/routes.py:811has aTODOcomment# federate blockwith placeholder ellipsis, andapp/post/routes.py:1384has a similarTODO. - Only moderation bans are federated:
app/shared/tasks/blocks.py:ban_personsendsBlockactivities exclusively for site/community bans, not user‑to‑user blocks. - Incoming blocks are handled:
app/activitypub/routes.py:1520‑1526processes incoming Mastodon‑style blocks (without atargetfield) and creates localUserBlockrecords, but there is no corresponding outgoing federation.
So as it stands now, Lemmy and PieFed experience the exact same thing. I guess Piefed users just don’t notice.
No it shows in piefed you can’t reply not that it shows up at all.
Just not accepting the comment was perfectly reasonable in their eyes
∞🏳️⚧️Edie [it/it/its/its/itself, she/her/her/hers/herself, fae/faer/faer/faers/faerself, love/love/loves/loves/loveself, des/pair, null/void, none/use name]@lemmy.encryptionin.space
5·6 days agoI cannot parse this comment, what do you mean?
ⓘ This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.
Added more context in separate reply with a link. But basically they’re saying it is a fine way to handle it, not adding comments if blocked on piefed but on lemmy, because it shows that you can’t reply on piefed.
So like most issues brought up brushed aside completely.
And now why I’m both curious and not curious to see if it actually does some of the user control stuff properly if a user is doing it on lemmy not piefed (the reputation/attitude thing where you get pushed by the system for not behaving properly)
My instance is a piefed software I believe. Dammit. This shit is just unforgivable and theres no reason for it besides being a fashy. Absolutely wild. I just liked the instance ideology :.(
Its got some silly shit but honestly the most annoying thing is the way they handle blocks. Most of this stuff can be turned off. The fact that we’re communicating means your instance has transcended the softwares fashy nature.
It still feels nasty using it now. I read this entire thread. Thanks for the very fucking confusing but interesting deep dive into the fashy software design theory. Shit is absolutely wild. I have no idea why anyone would want to even waste time implementing nonsense like this.
They just want reddit! They can’t accept that their concepts of freedom and democracy create the exact same controls they claim to hate.
I just find it funny that the things I’ve complained about in the past are being removed. Vote weights are gone, community kicking is gone. I think you can still put warnings on external communities (maybe instances) which is silly.
I’m tempted to make a hard fork of it and remove all the reddit shit and fix the blocking feature as a laugh. I wouldn’t have much interest in maintaining it though.
I think what I find the most hilarious after this is all of you hexbears have great social credit according to anarchist.nexus lol meanwhile it flags Donald J Musk and UniversalMonk lol
∞🏳️⚧️Edie [it/it/its/its/itself, she/her/her/hers/herself, fae/faer/faer/faers/faerself, love/love/loves/loves/loveself, des/pair, null/void, none/use name]@lemmy.encryptionin.space
7·6 days agoI remember seeing you talk in some other community and I didn’t point it out but I want to make sure you know, attitude and reputation are not the same thing.
Anyways, yeah, since we don’t have downvotes our attitude is always 1.0 (since it’s just the ratio of upvotes to downvotes) and our reputation should be pretty high since it’s only federated users that can downvote us.
ⓘ This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.
Yeah I comment too much. That makes sense with downvotes disabled, but it also highlights how silly it all is. If they could even see you, their systems wouldn’t work anyway lol
The universal monk one makes sense simply because of how much world hates that user
I’m tempted to make a hard fork of it and remove all the reddit shit and fix the blocking feature as a laugh. I wouldn’t have much interest in maintaining it though.
With how spaghetti the code must be given all the hard-coded ad-hoc on top of each other they have going on, you might be better off just rewriting it from scratch instead.
Yeah, that’s true. I actually had this thought last night instead:
Recreate the original reddit.com where it was just a single feed. Except with modern features like posting tags and user flairs. Basically, take Lemmy, distill it down so that it only serves a single community instead of many communities, and federate it.
The more I think about it though, the more it falls apart I think. Like, should users be allowed to follow other communities? Then at that point am I just recreating lemmy with more steps, where you have to host a whole web stack for each community? Probably.
I think if you want something without explicit communities centered around a singular main thread, I think something like a “tread tree”, by which I mean you would have a main thread and users could either post in that thread or make a “node post” that when you click on it would take you to a sub-thread with the “node” as it’s root, might be a better option than a single linear thread.
Not sure how one could go about integrating that system with the rest of the fediverse though. Maybe it could treat other instances as other trees where posts would be nodes of the main thread and comments would be in the corresponding sub-threads? You would simply have to sort the instance’s posts chronologically to generate the main thread so it shouldn’t be too hard to implement, and if there are too many you could only fetch the last few and only fetch older posts when the user scrolls far enough.
Also, without communities and with how long that system would make the main thread, that would definitely need some neat way to navigate the tree with the keyboard and some good filter and sorting options for users to get what they want from the tree, so tags, flairs, hashtags, and ways to look them up quickly would be a must as well.
If you don’t like the software specifically, you can switch to lemmy.dbzer0.com instead. Those two instances (anarchist.nexus and lemmy.dbzer0.com) are for all intents and purposes the same instance.
Idk it seems ya’ll have removed all that you can that sucks. This seems like a battle I’d worry about if I was in PieFed proper. I am so tired, boss.
Dont worry, we’ve disabled all we can of that.
Piefed is nice in its own way, but god damn it, those “features” suck. Some of them we can’t disable.
I especially hate the “AI detection” because it’s sloppy, can’t be disabled, and some people actually use the em dash, like me.
Can it be forked and disabled? I honestly wouldn’t mind assisting in maintaining something like that cause I’d use it. But thats a lot for something that I just love the amethyst UI for lol
Lmao holy shit
More opensource devs should subtly abuse their users like that.
ps
Some of my favorite stuff is just the comments about lemmy in the code.
# old Lemmy instances ( < 0.19.8 ) allow nsfw content in nsfw communities to be flagged as sfw which makes no sense # remove unnecessary "cross-posted from..." message that Lemmy inserts (only on link posts where we have a UI showing cross-posts) # Lemmy adds the community slug as a hashtag on every post in the community, which we want to ignore (Congrats hardware@lemmy.world, you've been hardcoded) # replace lemmy's spoiler markdown left in HTML clean_html = clean_html.replace('<h2>:::</h2>', '<p>:::</p>') # this is needed for lemmy.world/c/hardware's sidebar, for some reason. (I like that some how there is a Piefed flavor of markdown and a Lemmy flavor of mark down?) # this function lets local users use the more intuitive soft-breaks for newlines, but actually stores the Markdown in Lemmy-compatible format # Reasons for this: # 1. it's what any adapted Lemmy apps using an API would expect # 2. we've reverted to sending out Markdown in 'source' because: # a. Lemmy doesn't convert '<details><summary>' back into its '::: spoiler' format # b. anything coming from another PieFed instance would get reduced with html_to_text() # c. raw 'https' strings in code blocks are being converted into <a> links for HTML that Lemmy then converts back into []() def piefed_markdown_to_lemmy_markdown(piefed_markdown: str): # only difference is newlines for soft breaks. re_breaks = re.compile(r'(\S)(\r\n)') lemmy_markdown = re_breaks.sub(r'\1 \2', piefed_markdown) return lemmy_markdown (Aw that's nice. I wonder how much they'll have to update when 1.0 comes out...) # change back when lemmy supports flairs # flair = find_flair_or_create(json_tag, post.community_id) # if flair: # post.flair.append(flair) (Lemmy uses confusion. Piefed is confused!) # Lemmy sends 'like' for upvote and 'dislike' for down votes. Cool! When it undoes an upvote it sends an 'Undo Like'. Fine. When it undoes a downvote it sends an 'Undo Like' - not 'Undo Dislike'?! ∞🏳️⚧️Edie [it/it/its/its/itself, she/her/her/hers/herself, fae/faer/faer/faers/faerself, love/love/loves/loves/loveself, des/pair, null/void, none/use name]@lemmy.encryptionin.space
6·6 days agoThis seems to be many different things, could you break it up to make it clearer what fits together?
ⓘ This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.
∞🏳️⚧️Edie [it/it/its/its/itself, she/her/her/hers/herself, fae/faer/faer/faers/faerself, love/love/loves/loves/loveself, des/pair, null/void, none/use name]@lemmy.encryptionin.space
9·6 days agoModerators of a community can kick you from a community, which unsubscribes you from it, and does not notify you.
Actually admins.
Also apparently it doesn’t work?
ⓘ This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.
Yeah, this one is funny, because it was something that was shown off in their back end video that has now been deleted (but still linked to on their site). The endpoint is still there, so you can call it from the API, but the UI elements are gone. They are correct though, it wasn’t added by the lead developer, but, it did have to be merged by them, so there is some kind of approval of the feature I guess. I could have verified this wasn’t in anymore if it wasn’t such a nightmare to set up an instance.
∞🏳️⚧️Edie [it/it/its/its/itself, she/her/her/hers/herself, fae/faer/faer/faers/faerself, love/love/loves/loves/loveself, des/pair, null/void, none/use name]@lemmy.encryptionin.space
55·7 days agoIf anyone says it doesn’t matter, it does. Piefed will drop comments for multiple reasons, worst IMO is because someone has blocked someone or an instance, resulting in the entire instance (the blockers) being unable to see any reply from that person or instance to the blocker. An entire conversation can be happening, and you cannot see it. You cannot choose to see it, and unlike instance defederations where you can go to /instances and see which instances are blocked, you have no such way of knowing it.
Even worse, as far as I understand, if someone replies to a blocker in a community on the blockers instance, no other instance will know of the comment.
ⓘ This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.
Yeah but tankies on Lemmy support censorship in the abstract, which is worse than concrete.
That is so amazingly abusable. You can basically be a one-person defederator with a single account on any instance. The devs of piefed are so smart.
∞🏳️⚧️Edie [it/it/its/its/itself, she/her/her/hers/herself, fae/faer/faer/faers/faerself, love/love/loves/loves/loveself, des/pair, null/void, none/use name]@lemmy.encryptionin.space
22·6 days agoIt’s only replies to you that don’t show up. So you have to be a power poster too.
ⓘ This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.
Ahahaha so it’s a reward for bots and extreme obsessives
It also makes it easier to coordinate downvoting on specific users and make it so they can’t keep contributing
Blocked users still being able to reply to your comments is very abusable too. I don’t like how blocks work in Lemmy either.
If we are talking about dealing with interpersonal abuse and not just blocking people who annoy you, I think the Piefed approach is a bit better even if it’s borked with federation.
Shouldn’t that just be mods’ responsibly? Banning someone personally abusive?
Which mods? Seems complicated across communities and instances.
Moderation is federated in Lemmy, when I take a look at communities in other instances I never see content from users that were banned over there. There can be cases where a moderator on an instance that isn’t federated with mine bans a user on an instance that is (e.g. lemmy.world mod bans lemmy.ml user) and I would still see that user’s posts, but in practice this doesn’t happen very much and isn’t very abusable.
The big problem with the piefed system is that it gives every user a sliver of mod powers when usually moderators are supposed to be vetted; it’s also frowned upon for a moderator to get into an argument then take mod actions against the user they were arguing with, but PieFed gives every user the power to partially ban whoever they’re talking with.
I think it’s ok if posters get a say in who can see and interact with their posts/comments.
It’s so easy to abuse it’s not even funny. You can be a power poster who replies to almost everything, block the people who disagree with you, and make it look like everyone on the site is on your side because no one ever disagrees.
at the very least, your mods are able to ban them from your instance. i think it’s a lot less abusable to be able to designate people whose comments you personally can’t see than it is to designate people whose comments no one can see. at the very low end of what counts as abuse, i keep getting blocked by libs on reddit specifically so they can get the last word. it gives the appearance that they were so correct no one could come up with a response to their epic bacon comeback
making an account on a federating instance then blocking the piefed admins to talk shit without them being able to reply
Worried your social media platform isn’t growing fast enough? Don’t worry, we have the solution; simply lie about your platform and what it does, and be sure to lie extra hard about your competition!
Which one is lying? Piefed?
Piefed supporters at least are huge anti-“tankie” liars.
Got told all Marxists are MLs on there and banned for it :')
Piefed and Lemmy have been cooperative together so this kind of post is just literally going to harm both platforms. It has the goal of killing Lemmy, and therefore it has the goal of removing labour that is helping Piefed.
At the same time, isn’t the value proposition for PieFed largely based on sucking up right wing Lemmy users who don’t like the vibes of their instance being hosted on software that was developed by communists?
Just like lemmy.world, piefed is populated by people who just want Reddit 3.0 with their apps and a cop mommy/daddy that prevents them from experiencing cognitive dissonance (when users) or theoretical profit loss (for instance admins).
Maybe? I don’t know. If Piefed is doing so well then why does it have 12 donators on its Patreon while Lemmy has 112?
Why aren’t all the piefed true believers funding it?
pie
has always seemed astroturfed to me whenever i see losers talking about it.Maybe, or at the very least the people pushing it are not invested in piefed’s success, they are invested in lemmy’s end.
There are 3 groups that would astroturf to that end: Feds, fascists, dipshit neoliberals that don’t realise they’re doing the work of fascists, and corporations with a vested interest in seeing decentralised media fail.
That sounds like 4 but i count the fascists and the neoliberal anticommunists together for obvious reasons.
I actually think corporate wreckers are a strong and under-discussed possibility.
That sounds like 4 but i count the fascists and the neoliberal anticommunists together for obvious reasons.
lol i was getting a spanish inquisition sketch vibe
I would not be surprised at all if the project was a fed operation.
Yes.
while Lemmy lags behind as the transphobic genocide denying devs beg for donations with in built donation begging banners on all Lemmy instances front pages.
wut
∞🏳️⚧️Edie [it/it/its/its/itself, she/her/her/hers/herself, fae/faer/faer/faers/faerself, love/love/loves/loves/loveself, des/pair, null/void, none/use name]@lemmy.encryptionin.space
35·7 days agotransphobic
Nutomic has said some transphobic stuff, I forget the exacts, but I presume that is what that is about.
genocide denying
Presumably talking about the Uighur.
beg for donations with in built donation begging banners on all Lemmy instances front pages.
They added a banner that asks for donations, it shows up once a year.
while Lemmy lags behind
Piefed keeps adding stuff, while Lemmy is working on getting to 1.0 and is “slow” to do so.
ⓘ This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.
while Lemmy lags behind
Piefed keeps adding stuff, while Lemmy is working on getting to 1.0.
So it’s like with kerbal space program 2, they’re so focused on the graphics and neat little after-thought features that they end up neglecting the basic aspects of the software?
They’re also using Python, which allows them to more quickly prototype new stuff and more easily involve other developers, but in all likelihood will be less efficient from an engineering perspective in the long term. Lemmy is sort of a Rust experiment as a secondary thing, which takes longer to write and fewer people know at a proficient level.
god i hate python. every time i update my system some python program breaks. every single time. and not ignoring whitespace makes programming in it such a pain in the ass. plus it’s so slow all its packages are written in c++ anyway lmao
∞🏳️⚧️Edie [it/it/its/its/itself, she/her/her/hers/herself, fae/faer/faer/faers/faerself, love/love/loves/loves/loveself, des/pair, null/void, none/use name]@lemmy.encryptionin.space
10·6 days agoI don’t know, I haven’t looked at the code enough to be able to tell.
ⓘ This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.
Shit, we better hope cats don’t figure out the internets, talk about genocidal.
Piefed and lemmy. World are literally the exact same fucking thing AND THEY ARE BOTH IDENTICAL TO REDDIT, god I hate these fuckers
So piefed, you’ve admit you grabbed lemmy’s can. What do you have to say in your defense?
piefed, your silence will only incriminate you further.
Apparently most intances of both lemmy and piefed block this one. I just argued with some about it, I think it’s an insult to the intelligence of their users to ban something they don’t think their users should like, that it’s counter-productive, and it’s good to have the lines of communication open.
That there are other avenues less severe than defederating. Posts could be put behind an nsfw type banner. You could be given tools to mute them, all sorts of things.
It gets tricky when it comes to nazis though. Who is to say who is a nazi I don’t know but at a certain point you have to shut out a group no? Idk, but not a fan of censorship, especially for my own good, by people who live up the ass of people playing them as much as not.
It gets tricky when it comes to nazis though. Who is to say who is a nazi I don’t know but at a certain point you have to shut out a group no? Idk, but not a fan of censorship, especially for my own good, by people who live up the ass of people playing them as much as not.
Holy shit this user is the most boomer brained loser I have ever seen on the fediverse. Why is this user not banned?
Why is this user not banned?
Devil’s advocate: they’re actually really funny in a completely unintentional way.
My canon is that this is a very elaborate joke, this level of dumbasery cannot be natural, not even “western governments(LMAO)” can produce a dumbass like this one
Idk about that anymore https://hexbear.net/comment/6856103
People will whine about how .ml is apparently so hyper censorus, and then you’ll see chuds like this not even getting their comments removed
Because those complaints are usually just from people upset their terrible trolling efforts were removed or ignored
Like a scene from a 2000s action comedy where the drunken spy effortlessly stumbles through the laser hallway of our moderation system.
What about it?
Holy shit, you’re a straight up Nazi
There is a reason every instance banned yours.
do you think Nazis are more sophisticated in their racism than your “Western style governments have free speech and representation since ancient Rome and Greece, Eastern style regimes are authoritarian and they treat the leader as god. If you disagree with this you’re too PC” worldview, or is there supposed to be another difference?
You’re giving them too much credit TBH, they actually called the people in “the east” “obedient slave citizens”.
I’m sure I have no idea what you are talking about.
You’re implying you’re not a Nazi, but the comment chain I linked shows you explaining your worldview in a way that looks indistinguishable from how Nazis see the world. Where people who aren’t extreme racists would think, “our government is getting really repressive” you seem to think “our government is getting really Eastern” instead.
I’m not upset that the Nazis don’t like us
Are we “obedient slave citizens” like the people in “the east”?
You tell me pal. Frankly I don’t give a shit.
“I don’t actually give a shit” I say, as I type my hundredth reply
Frankly I don’t give a shit.
Why are you here and commenting, then?
LMAO.
I don’t see what is funny about you guys being tools of your leaders, needing to ask for permission to have an opinion, rather pathetic if you ask me. I wasn’t going to say anything but since you brought it up.
i’ve said this here before but people like this get a feeling like a rock in the pit of their stomach when they see something that (correctly) questions their worldview. the feeling tells them to look away, and sometimes to make everyone else look away too. they know something is wrong with the way they see things; they know a lot of what they say is flat-out incorrect. but that feeling in their stomach tells them never to dig deeper, never even to look at things they worry might correct their deeply-held beliefs about countries they’ve never even been to. you either learn to ignore that feeling when you need to like i did, or you spend your life leaving reddit and then trying to turn every place you go back into reddit.
what say you?
I say idc. Use lemmy. Use piefed. It doesn’t matter.
It doesn’t matter.
The purpose of Piefed is anti-communism and to accomplish this it includes a bunch of censorship and manipulation tools that also affect federated instances. It definitely matters.
lol okay. Then don’t use it.
I’ll say it again, it doesn’t matter. The folks who use piefed aren’t the ones you want to interact with. It doesn’t matter.
But it also leaves those who join not knowing it has fascistic tendencies vulnerable to their propaganda
Yeah the whole point of this project is to intercept people who would join the fediverse and steer them towards anti-communism and neoliberalism. Ideological rigidity is trojan horsed in under the guise of nifty features…the exact shit they accuse the Lemmy devs of. Piefed exists only to further the spread of fascistic tendencies dressed as liberalism.
I’m on both, but I’m spending more time on Piefed.
I’m curious, what do you like about it?
There is nothing especially specific, but it just feels like an easier and smoother experience.




















