• woodenghost [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    It’s the leading cause of death for many birds of prey in Europe too. Partly because hunters leave killed animals or their guts lying around, where the birds find them. It’s not just vultures who eat already dead prey, many species do if it’s available, like eagles. But even birds who only eat freshly killed prey (like falcons) are dying at alarming rates. Why? Because their prey often has lead embedded in their bodies. It’s not just that they eat lead because they mistake the pellets for food. One in three living ducks and geese in Europe has been shot before and has lead permanently embedded inside their body. Hunters will shoot at a swarm, kill one animal and hurt many more.

  • Solumbran@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    12 hours ago

    “Choose lead free ammunition”

    No?

    Just stop shooting guns and murdering things like a crazy ape?

    • FatVegan@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 minutes ago

      Let’s try the not poisonous bulltes first. Because something tells me that Americans can’t even do that.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      OK, I think this is an incredibly stupid argument.

      From the ethical perspective of anti-meat, hunting animals is so much better. They get to live natural lives, and they die in a similar manner to they do in nature (maybe a little faster, which is good).

      From an environmental perspective, hunting keeps pray populations in naturally healthy levels, since most of their predators are driven out of populated areas, because people don’t like to be attacked by wild animals. It also doesn’t consume many resources, as they’re just living their lives in nature.

      I don’t think there’s any valid argument against hunting honestly, besides just being grossed out by it. That’s fine, and you can just not do it. I’ve never hunted in my life, and I suspect I never will. It’s not really something I want to do. I can’t construct a good argument against it though, and I suspect you can’t either. If you can, give it a shot, and remember animals dying and being eaten is natural, and frequently necessary to maintain an equilibrium that was evolved to be maintained by external factors. Deer, for example, will die horrible deaths of starvation, and do damage to the environment, if they aren’t hunted by humans.

      • Senal@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Crazy ape comment aside (i’d put it closer to apes with delusions of grandeur but that’s just me), not shooting guns and allowing hunting aren’t mutually exclusive.

        Especially given all the hunting that happened pre-gun.

        I don’t know if it’s on purpose but your answer seems to be ignoring a lot of the realities of how the things you are proposing would work (or not work, as the case may be).

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Sure, you can hunt without guns. I don’t really see an argument for not using them though, as long as there’s no lead. What’s really the ethical or environment argument in favor of only allowing bows, or whatever? I see the emotional appeal, if people have a negative view of guns. Not a logical appeal though, besides maybe making them harder to access to prevent deaths by firearms. If you can ban hunting with firearms, you can also just ban using lead ammo, so I don’t see how banning them is the best option in general.

          I didn’t make any proposals in my above comment. It’s entirely statements of observations. I don’t know what you mean by saying you don’t see how they would work or not. I gave explanations of why hunting isn’t negative, and is often positive, but not any proposals of how anything should be done. Would you care to elaborate?

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      We killed the predators on a lot of our continent. Deer hunting is ecologically necessary here. And thats before we get into the boar problem

    • Damarus@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      The American mind cannot comprehend this. Probably due to neurological symptoms from lead poisoning or sth

      • arrow74@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        What are you even talking about? There are plenty of people that hunt even here in Germany.

        Americans don’t have a monopoly on hunting.

      • Pirat@lemmy.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Not sure if you’re American or not but here’s a question for you. These bald eagles are allegedly dying from lead poisoning from eating creatures shot by lead bullets/pellets. This must mean they are scavenging. Yes, I know bald eagles do that a lot but they also kill their own prey. So why aren’t vultures dying of this lead poisoning. Vultures only scavenge so it should happen much more often.

        Here’s another thought. 80% of eagles brought into a clinic may be dying of lead poisoning but that 80% is part of a small number overall. Notice they never say how many eagles are brought in.

        Here’s another thought for you: When someone says such and such is the fastest growing demographic for such and such a thing, it could just mean that there were very few such incidences. 2 such incidences occurred when there used to be just one. WOW! Hundred percent increase? Such incidences have DOUBLED!

        Don’t let Rita Skeeter twist your thoughts. Get the whole story.

        • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Ingestion of lead ammunition is the primary reason California Condors (obligate carrion eaters) almost became extinct, are still endangered, and aren’t having the greatest success with being reintroduced.

          As for bald eagles, they’re lazy smart, if they see takeout just sitting there, they’re not gonna make dinner from scratch.

          • Pirat@lemmy.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Secondary reply: I don’t know If I’d call bald eagles smart. When I drive by a road kill that has vultures and a bald eagle feasting at it, the vultures fly away from the road while the stupid eagle flies right in front of my car. I’ve nearly had them smash into my windshield several times. It is now my standard reaction to slow down if I see a bald eagle eating road kill. I don’t worry about the vultures because they know what to do.

            BTW, bald eagles were nearly driven extinct by DDT. We quit using that so bald eagles are now numerous enough that I have to brake to keep from hitting while they eat road kill despite the lead poisoning.

          • Pirat@lemmy.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Not denying the condor thing. Still didn’t answer the vulture thing. Yes, I know condors are a type of vulture but so are black vultures and turkey vultures which are more common than ever.

            • AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              4 hours ago

              A lot of wildlife rehabs don’t deal with the non-endangered or threatened birds. Several years ago a friend of mine found an injured bird of some sort and we called around trying to find help for it but all of the local rehabbers said if it wasn’t a bald eagle they couldn’t help. So because most vultures aren’t endangered afaik, they just die and probably nobody is keeping track.

        • Damarus@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I couldn’t tell you and I don’t really care. Just jumping on the opportunity to mock gun culture

    • ArgentRaven@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The overwhelming majority of bullets are used against paper or steel targets. Most hunters take the entire carcass for butchering, so the eagles aren’t eating lead from animals shot and left in the wilderness. And given the volume needed, I wouldn’t be surprised that they’re eating fragments fired at steel targets that they mistake for rocks to keep in their stomach to grind up food.

      • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 hours ago

        This is untrue, gastroliths are associated only with birds that eat plants. They grind up food, which isn’t necessary for meat. Eagles eat bullets from animals that have either been shot and abandoned, lost, or had parts of them discarded as zqxwas pointed out.

      • zxqwas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Don’t know what they do over there, but we usually get the lungs and guts out as soon as possible in order to keep the meat from spoiling. Long lived predators that likes to scavenge can develop lead poisoning from those remains if it’s their main source of food.

        If confusing with rocks was the main source you’d expect it to be just as common in other birds.

      • Solumbran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        11 hours ago

        That’s why I also mentioned to stop shooting guns. If you are shooting in such an unsafe way that fragments fly around and get lost, then you shouldn’t be allowed to shoot in the first place.

        • kn33@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          You’re not familiar with the concept of an outdoor target range, are you?

              • Solumbran@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                10 hours ago

                Yes, if there are bullets or parts of metal that fly randomly, it is always going to be a hazard. Even without lead poisoning, I don’t believe that chunks of metal in the digestive system would be good for this bird, or any other animal. And what is the point, what good does a stupid outdoors gun range bring? Even if you think that it’s fine for people to learn how to be better at shooting deadly weapons, what does an outdoors setting bring other than risks?

                • ebolapie@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  They’re cheaper to build and maintain, they’re more robust, they’re more dispersed, they can accommodate longer ranges, and they’re less restrictive on types of ammunition and types of firearms.

    • F/15/Cali@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      I think you might have some ontologically incongruous standards. We are crazy apes. You can take the guns away, but the murder will persist for millennia, if not gene edited out. Banning the guns and lead bullets is more likely to work than expecting humanity to spontaneously diverge from its evolutionary roots as a bang bus murder ape

      • Solumbran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I don’t know, humans are good at diverging from their instincts when it comes to letting sick people die, but when it comes to killing less, they cannot anymore?

        I think that low-ass standards are what prevent humans from getting any better, if you start justifying mindless murders as “just instinct” then of course people will be fine with it. And funnily enough, that’s one of the main arguments that hunters use, saying that they’re just doing something “natural”.

        • F/15/Cali@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          We are killing less. And overwhelmingly so. If you don’t count faceless, recontectualized packaged cow, chicken, and pig meat. We’re also still pretty good about keeping our close group alive, but medicine men, insurance, and numbers over 100 are a strictly cultural practice not cemented within our genetic memory in any helpful way, so society as a whole suffers under the burden of our limited empathy.

          You can also get into the economics of governance to get a good look at what it would mean to move the systems in place enough to reach the sort of universal socioeconomic safety that you’d personally find acceptable. I’m a fan of Europe’s deal… up to a point.

          I really don’t mean to cut things off, but the scope of this conversation would necessarily reach so incredibly wide that I don’t believe I can keep your attention or mine for a dozen pages of philosophy, biology, anthropology, history, psychology, and economics. In short, I, personally, can only expect people to fit neatly into a groove so long as it isn’t too far removed from the one we dug a hundred thousand years ago. Certain people have done too much to remove themselves, and to some degree us, from personal responsibility in the US to do anything but set fire to what we have.

      • NoDignity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Eagles will eat just about anything they physically can so probably lots of squirrels, rabbits, smaller possums and raccoons but also eagles will sometimes eat carrion so I could certainly imagine they sometimes get this off something like a deer carcass.

        • percent@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          IIRC, some bald eagles were found with neurological issues caused by nicotine from cigarette butts too.

        • SillyDude@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I was trying to think of what is getting shot with lead but still getting away. I just spent however long reading about wound rates for deer. Which is low, but yeah. One thing I wonder is if it has anything to do with the amount of fish they would be eating. No other north American raptor eats fish like bald eagles do that I can think of.

          • Formfiller@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            It’s lead shot California condors went extinct in the wild because of lead poisoning from birdshot but they bred some in captivity and reintroduced them.

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 hours ago

    This is partly why I haven’t got into air rifles, I have wanted to for a long time, but there is no good place to shoot it nearby.

    Some may say that I should just go out in the woods and shoot there, but I don’t want to spread lead in nature.

    I know there are lead free pellets, but I have heard mixed opinions about them.

    Why an air rifle specifically?

    Because I can get a low power one (10J muzzle energy) without a license, and I can’t be arsed to get a license for a proper firearm as it requires a fair commitment here.

    • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      58 minutes ago

      You can get pellets and ball ammo in other materials. Might have to special order them, not sure how available they are over there, but they do make them. I have steel ammo for my air pistol, it’s my back yard pleasure shooting gun, so lead isn’t acceptable to me.

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        55 minutes ago

        I live in an apartment, so I need to find a good place to shoot before I get a rifle, I’ll also checkout what other kinds of pellets I can get.

    • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      I can’t be asked to get a license for a proper firearm

      My god, what tyranny you live under, please tell me what authoritarian country you live in so uncle sam can come free you after we’re finished with Iran.

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Hehe, I’d be happy to tell you my general understanding of the laws, I am not a gun nut, and there are probably a few details I get wrong.


        Anyway.

        In Sweden you can only get a gun for two reasons, hunting or competition, getting a gun for self defense is illegal.

        To get a gun for either reason, you need to pass tests and for competition licenses, display an active need for the gun in competitions.

        Wikipedia has a better summary of the laws on this page:

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overview_of_gun_laws_by_nation#Sweden

    • zxqwas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 hours ago

      For Air rifles you can have a bullet catcher that is basically a funny shaped tin can you put your paper target in front of. It will collect the lead if you hit the target.

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Yeah, I just know I am bound to miss and don’t want to contaminate anything.

    • SillyDude@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      If you just want to plink in your backyard then just get a BB gun that shoots steel BBs. And only use iron sights which will teach you instinctive aiming. I’d say that’s actually way more fun than a scoped air rifle. If you’re not going to be head shorting squirrels then you don’t really need the accuracy of a dialed in air rifle. Looking in a scope at a piece of paper and shooting the same hole looses its appeal pretty quickly.