• pjwestin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    14 hours ago

    There could be something there, if they tread new ground. Instead of Austin’s semi-misogynistic 60s free-love attitude being out of step with modern 90s sensibilities, you could have the over the top action tropes of the 90s come into conflict with gritty, realistic action sequences that have become popular in modern spy thrillers. Pair him up with a Daniel Craig/Jason Borne style spy; one of them is throat punching assassins in desperate, close combat fight scenes while the other is running casually through gunfire, judo-chopping goons. Might be fun.

  • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    You can’t do a new Austin powers without Verne Troyer. Mini me is too iconic, let’s remember his legacy

  • bigbangdangler@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    Would it be a money grab? Probably.

    Were the other movies good? Not really.

    Do I actively love them? Yes.

    Would I watch this? 100%.

    I miss this kind of movie with really stupid humor that knows it’s really stupid. They don’t seem to make many of them anymore… probably because they think they won’t sell.

    • Benaaasaaas@group.lt
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Haven’t watched but at least trailers for “The Naked Gun” seem pretty promising.

  • themoken@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m not watching an ad or a Twitter post to get a read on this but does anyone actually want this? I watched the first one many times because I was 12 and then grew out of it by the sequel. A lot of this late 90s/early 00s comedy seems cringe at best and problematic at worst and now needs to compete with infinite sophomoric YouTube videos.

    Not to mention, the Bond franchise got way serious in response to Austin Powers, and the 60s spy he was parodying doesn’t seem nearly as culturally relevant to the kids this would need to appeal to to be successful.

    … Or is this pure cash grab?

    • PumaStoleMyBluff@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      It’s only cringe/sophomoric because it’s highlighting those aspects of the early bond films. They were wrapped in a serious and glitzy bow, but Austin Powers just sheds that, it doesn’t add anything newly problematic.

    • BrilliantantTurd4361@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yes cant wait!

      All three were fun comedies. An updated take will be fun too!

      We have capitalism. Everything is a cash grab. At least this is a fun one. Fun.

      • Zahille7@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Tbh I’m glad I saw yours and the other replies saying how much you like these movies. They’re some of my childhood favorites, and we even saw the third one in theaters when it came out because my brother and I loved them.

        I still love them.

    • RaphaelSchmitz@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      It was about a man from the 60s struggling with the societal changes of the (at that time) modern times.

      You don’t think there’s new stuff to struggle with from the last 20 years?

    • makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think there’s actually a really interesting opportunity here. The late 60s/early 70s bond that Austin Powers was parodying would mean that a new one would be parodying late 90s/early 2000s movies and culture. Plus Austin Powers has been portrayed as “woke”, he refuses to sleep with women who can’t consent, is sexually open, and advocated for women in power. It’d be a very fine line to do well but I could definitely see a modernized Austin Powers hitting millennial nostalgia while also staying true to the character and being entertaining

      • IronBird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        revived…

        “surely this time we finally smashed those capitilists pigs, ah comrades?”

    • resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      No.

      Even after death, your lifeless corpse will be reanimated (with your heirs’ consent) to continue wringing money out of your humanity.

      Forever.

  • "Laser" @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Did he say: “There’ll be an Austin Powers 4. Oh yes, there will be an Austin Powers 4?”

  • PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    I had always wondered if we’d get one, the end of Goldmember pretty strongly implies there would be another with Scotty as the bad guy. Maybe it’ll be a riff on Thunderball.

    • Widdershins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      He lost a lot of weight at the end of Goldmember but Mike Meyers said in the commentary that Fat Bastard would be back.

      • spamfajitas@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        IIRC Fat Bastard lost all that weight by eating Subway…Goldmember was in 2002. There were also a couple jokes about Fat Bastard eating babies…then 2007 is the beginning of when Jared absolutely wrecked Subway marketing with his predator stuff all the way to 2015. I can’t imagine they’d leave an opportunity to fit something about that into at least one joke.

  • espentan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    There are 3? I would’ve sworn there were two, and I really only remember the first one.