Firefox says it will keep supporting uBlock Origin even as Microsoft Edge and other Chromium browsers phase it out under Manifest V3.

  • Victoria@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    177
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    If they ever stop supporting it I will continue to use the last version to support it, any website that breaks compatibility with this Firefox version can get fucked.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      121
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      That’s a significant security risk, unfortunately.

      If that happens, I’d suggest a fork with a built in blocker, one that still gets security patches from upstream Firefox.

      • St.Elsewhere@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        69
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Exactly. Ublock origin is notable only for being part of 0 ad companies and 100% trustworthy. The blocking lists are universal. If it’s built into the browser, you’re golden

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          32
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Well…

          You are still very dependent on the browser devs, themselves. Not just on their benevolence, but on their security practices too. And on them pulling in upstream security patches, quickly.

          TBH, this is why I do finance stuff on vanilla Firefox. I love my browser forks, but I’m a bit more cautious with them, too.

            • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              True, sometimes. But they don’t have the sheer manpower dedicated to security that Mozilla has, nor the institutional policies that try to mitigate losing a key/account or something like that. Also, technically, vanilla Firefox is first to get the zero-day patches.

              Not that the forks are dangerous or anything.

        • ruby@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          i mean… blocking lists are universal, but the other features ublock offers are not - i’m making heavy use of ublock’s dynamic filtering panel and per-site switches. one important thing i use ublock for is to whitelist which sites get javascript permissions and to get rid of remote fonts to make pages more readable. those features need manifest v2.

          if firefox drops manifest v2 and you’re relying purely on those inbuilt blocking lists then you might as well use the manifest v3 version of ublock without seeing a difference, right?

          • amorpheus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 days ago

            you might as well use the manifest v3 version of ublock without seeing a difference, right?

            Can confirm, I was thinking about switching off of Chrome due to this but since I don’t use the custom stuff (much) I’m not noticing a difference with the v3 compatible “light” version of uBlock Origin.

          • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            if firefox drops manifest v2

            I think they said they will go out of their way to keep the extension APIs in Mv3 that uBlock needs

    • anon_8675309@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I’ll just spend my reading time reading more books than I do now. Forcing me to look at ads will not work.

  • nullspace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    143
    ·
    6 days ago

    I can’t imagine using the web without firefox and ublock. Even the cookie consent popups are awful.

    • LucidNightmare@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      6 days ago

      Seriously. I clear my cookies on Firefox exit because I don’t want their shit on my computer if it isn’t needed.

      This would cause me to see them every single damn time.

      • FlowerFan@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I recommend using the extensions Containers and “temporary containers” instead. This way you can keep cookies for specific containers / websites but all the other cookies get deleted.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yeah, the user experience of “just wipe cookies on browser exit” is a lot better than “have a million prompts all over zillions of sites”.

        However, regarding “every single damn time”…some sites can have their “do you want cookies” popup just blocked by the Firefox I still don’t care about cookies addon. It’s not a solution for every site out there, but it’ll get a lot of them.

        It’s also possible to use another extension, Behind the Overlay on some sites. This does require a click, so manual action, but it tries to identify “pop-over” content that covers up the browser window and remove it with that click. It’s really intended as a more-general solution to “pop-over” stuff, but cookie pop-ups often take this form and can be dismissed.

        • refreeze@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          You can also just enable one of the “Cookie notices” lists in your ublock settings, no need for another extension.

        • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          have a million prompts all over zillions of sites”.

          I’m using Ghostery to automatically reject all of those. They pop-in and almost immediately disappear.

          • JackbyDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Ghostery blocks trackers then sells data about your tracking blocking habits. It was the first tracker blocker I heard of but Privacy Badger is the better one nowadays.

            • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              Not true since 2017 (and even before that it was kinda’ disputed). The adblock part of the business went to Cliqz, a German privacy-focused browser, backed by Mozilla.

              I have downvoted your comment because it’s repeating a popular myth, nothing against you personally.

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Ublock Lite still works in Chrome (and it still blocks YouTube ads, not sure about cookie popups), but you get no control over the filters. Just a slider with some presets to choose from. So while better than nothing, just stick with Firefox.

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Pretty sure I’ve read months ago that the maintainers said they’ll try to support it as long as possible but at the moment v2 support is removed from the source code, they’ll won’t have the resources to add it back again.

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        vivaldi recently disabled uBO and said it’d soon be unsupported. you can re-enable for now

        • charade_you_are@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          I was using vivaldi and they were kind enough(seriously) to inform me that they don’t support ublock anymore maybe a week ago.

          Not sure about the reason but I think that it’s a technical thing the Google changed to deliberately make it easy to end ublock on a lot of browsers. Might not be the only reason(actual tech upgrades) but I believe it’s part of the reason since major conspiracies seem much more likely these days.

          Anyway, I switched back to Librewolf even though it can’t play x.265 files (jellyfin). Anything that kills the use of ublock is dead to me even though they have their own shitty, bullshit blocking solution. It’s never going to be as good as ublock edit grammar and shit

          • im_fine_sandy@nord.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 days ago

            It’s not a conspiracy. It’s been a very well published and discussed process.

            There are exceptions but browsers are either reconfigurations of firefox, like librewolf, or reconfigurations of google chrome, like vivaldi.

            Some dweeb will be along in a moment to tell us all how vivaldi is not merely a reconfiguration, but the point is …

            google changed the manner in which plugins can interact with the web page you see. In recent months you could re-enable the old plugin interface by recompiling with a different configuration, but once google makes a change that breaks that old interface then you can’t just re-enable it.

            • charade_you_are@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              Admittedly, I haven’t tried too hard to get it working in any of the FF browsers lately…my unraid server blew up and it was handling hardware acceleration with a cheap intel vid card. I haven’t felt like messing with until now so I’ll give it a shot. Thanks for the info

              edit: no transcoding when l tried an x.265 in regular firefox. sweet

        • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 days ago

          No, you should forget brave it’s yet another piece of shit chrome knock off. Just like the rest. It ain’t immune. It can kick and scream but either the entire project dies or they bend the knee eventually.

  • TWeaK@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    5 days ago

    Alternate headline: Firefox is now the only browser worth using.

    And in any case, lumping Firefox as one browser is disingenuous. There are numerous Firefox forks, just like every other major browser is in fact a Google Chromium fork.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      it still boggles my mind that Microsoft developed Edge as a standalone browser as a replacement for IE then just said “nah, let’s just use Chromium.”

      • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        6 days ago

        What is mediocre about it? What would be an example of a good browser, and what are the differences?

        • Carl@anarchist.nexus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Nothing is mediocre about it. All of the “best” browsers are based on FF’s Gecko engine. Maybe they have complaints about Mozilla or the weird stuff they’ve been doing with FF recently. But the actual Gecko engine is solid, and it’s what all the best browsers are based on.

        • Deep@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          5 days ago

          im an old web dev and im stuck in my shitty ways which includes not liking how ff is the only effing browser that takes extra effort to make the front-end look and function correctly. tbh, i do use ff on android 99% of the time, but ff on desktop breaks too many sites if you have any inkling of ff’s security turned on.

          im not wrong, you all are just fanboys

      • Doug@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        complaints not parsed into action items aren’t worth anyone’s time.

        • Deep@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          you assume im here to enrich your online experience. im not. parse your own shit

          • Doug@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            3 days later and that’s all you’ve got? No wit in that staircase. The only time you’re worth is the catharsis in telling you to kick rocks; so kick rocks.

    • mesa@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Is there a good small cheap repairable phone out there? I have a fairphone4 and I LOVE /E/ OS. But I would also like to actually USE a linux phone. And I cant experiment as much as I would want on my main phone.

      Ive almost thought about carrying a tiny burner phone then a small laptop for everything else.

        • mesa@piefed.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          You have a point.

          …it is a really nice phone.

          I just cant afford two. First world problem haha.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        I have a fairphone4 and I LOVE /E/ OS. But I would also like to actually USE a linux phone

        What do you mean? You can’t use your FP4?

        I’m considering getting a FP6 relatively soon, and would be using it as my only one…

        • mesa@piefed.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          I use android via /e/os. But I cannot experiment with my only phone. There is 2fa and other such services that I have to have access to. Worst case, I cant get into accounts and such.

          FF is a great phone btw.

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            There is 2fa and other such services that I have to have access to. Worst case, I cant get into accounts and such.

            That’s my main concern too.

            Here in Denmark, the MitID authentification app is completely integral to functioning online, and last I checked it doesn’t work on GrapheneOS, so /e/os is probably not likely either 🫤

            • cabbage@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              I got myself a physical code chip because MitID doesn’t work with /e/. The code chip works great.

              The app is probably convenient, but I am also very happy not to depend on my phone to sign in to everything.

        • Attacker94@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Every Linux phone uses an android shim just because it isn’t possible to change the firmware iirc

      • communism@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Last I was aware, Linux phones work really well on Google Pixel 3as. They’re no longer supported by stock Android nor still manufactured so I assume the second hand ones will be cheap.

        • mesa@piefed.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          I appreciate the response.

          I have owned two google phones. Both had hardware issues/battery issues and one almost exploded. One day it got super hot and the battery turned into a spicy pillow. Sorry but im not going to get another google phone as long as I live. Neither lasted more than 2 years.

          • communism@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            That’s fair. Which models did you have? I had a couple problems with the earlier Google Pixels, but I’ve found the later ones have really ironed out their hardware problems.

            I think your main problem is going to be finding phones for cheap that also work well as Linux phones. I think the lowest-effort options like Pine phones are gonna cost you more. But I wish you luck.

            • slugger@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              I had a p7 and it only lasted 3 yrs. Motherboard went. 750 euros that had cost brand new. First phone I have bought that didn’t last > 5 yrs

    • Vogi@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      As far as I know the Google Developer Verification BS won’t reach Custom ROMs right? But yea in the long run it probably makes sense to make the jump one day or another.

  • bullsworth@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 days ago

    Sometimes I think it was a mistake to let the programs we primarily use to view text and images become bloated virtual machines that execute megabytes of arbitrary code with every page load.

  • RonnyZittledong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Like a true google hate inspired hipster I have been using Firefox for at least the past 9 years. Don’t let one of the shittiest companies control even more of the world because you are too fucking lazy to switch to a different browser. If you have to deal with a few shitty websites made by morons that only work in chrome keep a secondary chromium install on standby when you have to hold your nose and use it.

    As someone who has made websites for the last 25 years professionally it’s usually Safari that you have to treat as a special little princess. But somehow government and bank websites hire the laziest and most incompetent people that can even fuck up basic Firefox to Chrome compatibility that even a few minutes of testing could prevent… but now I am getting onto a tangent so I thing I should stop…

    • neclimdul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      Honestly I can only think of one. Weirdly a “developer platform”

      Well I guess a couple more because keyboard firmware sites do that usb browser thing that terrifies me is a thing and only chrome supports.

      • RonnyZittledong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        I have been a web dev for over 25… oh god… approaching 30 years, and most web dev teams with an ounce of self respect will spend the honestly trivial time to test against different browsers. I consider it a basic part of the god damn job. Even still banks and government sites seem to not give a fuck.

      • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Nativia is a cross platform electron app that runs on your machine without network access and allows you to configure most of these keyboards. It’s also open source.

  • biginjapan@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    6 days ago

    Being unable to use manifest v2 extensions anymore on most chromium based stuff has resulted in me writing off almost all browsers that are base on chromium. Kudos to Firefox for continuing to support it! Let’s hope that does not change at all anytime soon.

  • herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    5 days ago

    I tried browsing the internet without uBlock Origin. I hated it in 5 minutes. I’m not going back to there anytime again. If your browser does not support uBlock Origin, then I am not using it.

    • EastofEdson@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      Right? I just set up a new phone and had Firefox installed but no extensions yet. Had to search something and the website I ended up on was plastered in ads. Is this how some people actually live? I closed the site and installed uBlock Origin and then went back to the same site. Holy shit, night and day difference.

  • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    If it goes… I don’t know what I’ll do.

    Go out and touch grass probably.

    Get a hobby.

    Perfect my molotov recipe.

  • mountainRadish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    6 days ago

    Future is dark:

    1. Android getting locked down

    2. They are asking your government ID to use OS, access internet etc.

    There must be real protest, revolution, something otherwise it will just get worst

    • Super Mega Ultra Edition DX Unleashed 64@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      pssst: it’s gonna get worse

      Download a shitload of epubs, roms, backup of wikipedia, and get ready for full-on, unmissable, 1984-style marketing and propaganda culture. You’ll see it, you’ll have to see it, and there will be no option B.

      • mountainRadish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        I am not sure what your comments mean. I am in tremendous back pain. And didn’t sleep For so long, and the fucking humidity.

        I want to add more. And vent.

        I am old enough and I saw similar actions, and the out come of it.

        Slwoly we are forced to use ESIMS, where I live, I have to pay every time I switch phones.

        And if I am outside of the country, I can’t even switch phones.

        I love the idea of esims, but not how it is implemented.

        Digiral data produced by me is so.expensive to keep.

        It is the digital age, but not a digital .storage age, it is cheaper to print shit.

        Optical storage can store terabytes of data, easy to maintain, you can design a device where the hdd store meta data and anyone from your family cam access the data stored on archival optical drives.

        It is not built because they want us to use the cloud. Maybe it is greed, control, surveillance.

        I just want a simple cartridge that can store my data for decads and technologically that is easily done. There are already archival optical storage sold to data centers, but why not to small businesses or consumers!?!?

        It is basically several bluray discs in a cartridge.

        The future is dark because of human nature.

        And we will do nothing about because look at state of printers. The ink cost more than gold per gram

        Look at air purifiers all proprietary filters that are over priced

        And yes I know about CR boxes but those furnace filters are only sold in USA.

        We are not good creatures

        Sorry, I am coherent enough to know I am not coherent, I needed to vent.

      • hardcoreufo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        I’ve got 100tb getting filled. I’m ready. Ok in reality its closer to 60 tb after raid and I’m duplicating the important stuff across 2 devices. But that’s only about 5 tb. But I’m including lots of PDFs epubs and zims as important stuff. The rest is just media.

      • diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Not enough, computers are a limited resource. They should be optional in my opinion, but money machines don’t care, so… Here’s a text wall I just copied from one of my other replies. It’s assuming and talking about a scenario closer societal collapse than 1984, but could be useful either way.

        the

        I’ve thought a lot about this before. Updoot because it’s a good question.

        Basically, if an anarchist society still has access to all of the books and such for long enough, someone somewhere eventually will figure it out. Blowing them glass bulbs is surprisingly uncomplicated once you have metallurgy (tutorial), you don’t even have to use mercury for the vacuum if you happen to have a regular factory built compressor nearby (will one from a fridge work? nobody knows, nobody tried), which you can then rebuild later. Build some circuits using wood + nail and metal wires as the PCBs, do random things to see how it reacts and learn from it. Now, electricity itself and metallurgy are fun but out of scope for this explanation.

        While that is happening, people can reuse existing TV boxes, routers and such. Someone could do a tiny C program or something to distribute data over the existing computers or something, then advertise it over (real life) bullet-in boards. Ironically, I suggest more distributed solutions (whenever possible/feasible of course) over something like this site, or usenet (R.I.P., now just full of piracy). Non-technical people can get their friends to help with using that. People who where previously sysadmins for ISPs and stuff should then probably allow just port scanning IPv4 to discover other people, and/or the v6 multicast (well, hopefully they can figure that out if they haven’t been “docker-washed” or whatever). Now, once someone figured something out, they share it with the comrades and “advertise” it using that solution. Or again, just the real life bullet-in boards.

        If there are enough good minds, they can then proceed to basically skip “regular” transistors and diodes (and maybe even real PCBs, although some already do that at home) and go straight for the micro fab. Now, it requires many fields of science. Like first, you need to take a few buckets of sand, containing rocks and shells and shit (literally), then purify it. Like, really really really fucking pure. This is where my personal level of expertise ends but I am sure that eventually some talented people in their own respective fields can meet up and think of something over an afternoon. From what I know (probably wrong), this basically involves melting it in a vacuum, unmelting, melting, unmelting and so on, then from the piece that formed you have to cut off the edges where all of the impure stuff ended up. Now, you need to make patterns on it. This guy figured it out but gave in and started a company. Basically, instead of the template you shine light through, you could substitute an office projector for something really shitty scale and really shitty reliability, but functional. The rest is mostly chemistry… idk I don’t speak chemistry.

        Now, you can go get someone who speaks transistor logic to implement some really shitty instruction set in hardware. I am sure it wouldn’t be too complicated to address map a teletype for some I/O. First few programs can be in ROM right inside the CPU (with redundant bytes of course given how shitty the manufacturing is) for testing, until RAM is figured out.

        Oh look, my new chip draws boobs on paper!

        Then you, again, go share your findings with the society and find someone who still has a RISC-V design or something downloaded. Now, that might get good enough to run a multi user operating system (this will make sense soon). As much as we hate the C stdlib and all of it’s tech debt, I am not sure if anyone will be up for redoing all of that (yet). I have been shilling OpenBSD a lot lately, but for something like this I would imagine NetBSD would be more fitting. Plan 9’s stdlib is MUCH better (and there’s a functional WIP RISC-V port), but to properly use that you will need pointing and CRT tech so it’s kind of a circular loop there, and it’s also not as accessible due to being mostly GUI and due to having lots of single letter commands/shortcuts to remember across the included programs. Although whatever you can get your dirty hands on (I am being slightly pessimistic (or realistic, even) and assuming not having access to the internet at this stage, the one and only as we know for being controlled by the big IANA). Fork the OS you got. Most tools have been generally designed around some level of hierarchy, although for source control, git and compatibles (got…) remain best (thanks, Torvalds 2005). The reason is sharing patches over plain text, and more importantly applying them, becomes trivial (if you add a signature/checksum, even more so, as you now know it wasn’t corrupted or line converted or anything). Allow anonymous editing like for TCC to minimize said hierarchy (maybe invent a better solution later, like something distributed with proof of work for voting if a patch gets in or not… too bad all of this terminology has been taken by crypto bros). Speaking of TCC, that’s a nice ass compiler, should probably use that to avoid hogging the tiny brain you’ve just built for others. “What others”, well…

        Here’s the part where a multi-user OS starts making sense. As soon as networking starts to network, put it right onto the usual networks with existing repurposed computers from before. Let it be like a pubnix, or “shell provider” if you like calling it that. Let people fuck around, find out (“help I deleted authorized_keys”), maybe even discover backdoors and other bugs. While that is happening, go improve, go make more, go offer some units IRL to especially interested people. Obviously, share the hardware designs, so someone also especially dared could do the office projector thing, while someone else is trying to figure out how to replace the said office projector with something more DIY.

        And basically, there you go. Now, this is technically possible under de-facto capitalism; although I am not sure if anywhere on this planet right now exists a community of especially dared, IRL connected and unoccupied enough in time people.

        EDIT: figured someone might want to use this text.

                    DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO PUBLIC LICENSE
                            Version 2, December 2004
        
         Copyright (C) 2004 Sam Hocevar <sam@hocevar.net>
        
         Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim or modified
         copies of this license document, and changing it is allowed as long
         as the name is changed.
        
                    DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO PUBLIC LICENSE
           TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COPYING, DISTRIBUTION AND MODIFICATION
        
          0. You just DO WHAT THE FUCK YOU WANT TO.
        
  • asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 days ago

    Happy with Librewolf. I can’t imagine using my browser everyday if I don’t have a good adblocker on it like uBO.