Stop shoving AI shit into my face every five seconds thanks

Also I just hate hate hate how AI companies think we’re all morons that need everything spoonfed to us by an LLM and are constantly trying to get us to self-lobotomise

umm grok pls tell me what this says me no read long sentences good : (((( except its not even some dense scientific paper but just a news article

  • makotech222 [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    please for the love of god just check the settings menu there is already a ‘block all ai enhancements’ feature. no other browser has that, firefox at least gives a very easy option to disable it all.

  • Mutalisk [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I recently got a Firefox ad (lol) where the only thing that was shown off was how supposedly easy it is to turn off AI components catgirl-huh

    We’re officially at the point where companies spend money to convince you that you don’t have to use their amazing new feature because it’s so shit only the executives like it

  • citations_wheated [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    4 days ago

    love the wording and design choice of this stupid feature set. this is ass backwards, I’m not even a programmer or coder but I know its contrary to acceptable user interface convention. you have to toggle enable to block the AI shit nobody asked for, like its inevitable, waiting to embed its tendrils into your every interaction with the browser, but we’re giving you the option to not be one of the cool people (for now)

    I’m pretty sure they changed the keyboard shortcut to open the extensions page within the last few version, breaking years of muscle memory. now it (Ctrl+Shift+A) opens some tab navigation crap.

    also, fuck the new rapid version releases and now weekly patch bumps because of this mindless adherence to a ridiculously short, fixed rolling release window

    also also, deleting multiple history entries through the Ctrl-H side menu is now completely broken, and it was already glitched badly for many years (would immediately deselect everything after selecting)

    fuck Mozilla, they were the last holdout of sanity and stability in this fucked up devolving internet

        • tocopherol [any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          4 days ago

          like, everything else in real life is becoming infected with this madness.

          Seriously, I don’t know if I’m losing my mind or what, but for example I had to setup a computer for work. I take a new MacBook out of the box and get it going, the next day with nothing changed the trackpad was all fucky and then it crashed and started an endless restart loop, not even letting me go to system recovery or any sort of safe mode. Among other inexplicable problems with tech I had during the last week.

  • Soot [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I’d point technically proficient people to LibreWolf on Desktop, Firefox with all the shit stripped out - AI, inbuilt ads, A/B experiments, telemetry all off (and privacy features enabled).

    You do need to tweak a few things as the enabled privacy features mean you might run into issues with a few websites though, however.

    • QuietCupcake [any, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      I would second this suggestion, even if you don’t consider yourself technically proficient, still give LibreWolf a try because it works out of the box just as well as Firefox for 99% of web pages ime. If you’re inclined to fine tune it, it walks you through the tweaks you might want to implement at the beginning.

      For mobile I’ve been using Fennec, which has worked fine if not better than Firefox mobile. But there may be better suggestions out there for a mobile browser.

      • nfreak@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        IronFox is a pretty solid mobile option, though it’s more difficult to tweak than LibreWolf and does feel like it has more compatibility issues. I keep Fennec installed as a backup, and when all else fails Vanadium works fine.

  • Bilb!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    lol, I’ll be the one to say I think it’s still pretty good. It’s fine. They don’t always prioritize what I wish they would, and I disable some stuff they introduce in an attempt to keep up with Chrome, but besides that I think they’ve done a good enough job in maintaining the last existing alternative to the Blink and Webkit rendering engines. The alternate versions of it like LibreWolf, Waterfox, Floorp, Zen, and Ironfox (on Android) are great, but they all 100% dependant on baseline Firefox going on. I feel frustrated with them, sure, but a part of me is also saying “do what you need to do to keep going.”

    • doublepepperoni [none/use name]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I’m certainly not about to switch to Chrome or suggesting they should stop existing but it does not seem like they do not have the finger on the pulse of the sorts of nerds who actually use Firefox at all

  • userse31 [it/its, she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    It’s also just slow.

    The latest version on Linux on my machine will sit there and not open any tabs for a couple dozen seconds. Oh sure, you can type text into the url bar! But pressing enter? Doesn’t seemingly do anything at first.

    And then BAM! A billion tabs finally open!

    Like what the hell? This is a mid 2010’s business laptop! Is having a hard drive the thing that causes this shit? Really? What the fuck?

    • barrbaric [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 days ago

      If it’s been in use that whole time and that’s the original hard drive that’s almost certainly part of the problem. That said, I’m on a low-end gaming PC and I also have performance issues with firefox on linux so it’s not the only problem.

      • userse31 [it/its, she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 days ago

        It’s no speed demon but the hard drive is in plenty adequate health, and everything else on the laptop opens in plenty acceptable times.

        Cold boots aren’t unreasonable too!

        But you open firefox and it’s just… UUUUUGH!

        Ghidra is second slowest but that’s mostly relegated to it being a complicated Java program that creates and accessed multiple gigabyte sized documents. Even still the GUI and things respond plenty quickly. It’s only really saving, opening, and fill file analysis that takes time.

    • hello_hello [hy/hym]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 days ago

      Chromium is definitely faster but also no Linux distribution enjoys packaging chromium (the secret to building chromium is to first become a Google engineer).

      • PorkrollPosadist [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        4 days ago

        The Gentoo maintainers finally threw in the towel on Chromium about a week ago.

        Portage output / rationale
        !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "chromium" have been masked.
        !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request:
        - www-client/chromium-151.0.7922.169-r1::gentoo (masked by: package.mask)
        /var/db/repos/gentoo/profiles/package.mask:
        # Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> (2026-09-24)
        # Increasingly challenging to maintain with increased release cadence,
        # upstream toolchain changes, and conflicts between trying to provide
        # a consistent experience for Gentoo users (avoiding bundled where possible)
        # vs. getting updates out in a timely manner.  Many unfixed vulnerabilities.
        #
        # Keeping it in ::gentoo isn't a matter of just supplying an updated ebuild,
        # but a commitment to keeping it up to date and finding a compromise between
        # users' expectations (like various USE flags & not forcing all bundled
        # components) and maintainability.
        #
        # Still supported packages include:
        #   www-client/google-chrome variants
        # Other chromium-based browsers:
        #   www-client/microsoft-edge
        #   www-client/opera
        #   www-client/vivaldi
        # qtwebengine-based browsers (uses chromium's engine):
        #   kde-apps/konqueror
        #   www-client/falkon
        #   www-client/qutebrowser
        # Other browsers:
        #   www-client/firefox and www-client/firefox-bin
        #   www-client/seamonkey
        #
        # Removal on 2026-10-24.  Bug #982204.
        

        Bug mentioned: https://bugs.gentoo.org/982204

        • hello_hello [hy/hym]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Yeah I can hardly blame them, chromium maintainer rebuilds require high end hardware that still then take weeks and you have to do that every week. Qtwebengine and webkit-gtk still give me nightmares.

          Firefox has an established relationship with downstreams and has a consistent release cadence.

      • userse31 [it/its, she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        I know the last version of firefox that’s compatible with Android 4.1 is weirdly slow, even on reasonably specced low end devices in my stash.

        “reasonably specced low end” as in “1.0GiB of RAM, and two or four cores at a decent clock speed.”