Reposting this from here from 2023, after I stumbled across it tonight and it hits hard.

The text in the image:

I love my smart TV. I love the way it takes a long time to boot up because it’s trying to refresh the advertisements on the home screen. I delight in the way it randomly restarts because it’s downloaded an update without asking me, each of which makes the TV slower and slower with every subsequent install. I adore the way it buries the apps that I want to use, and that I use without fail every single time, below the apps that it’s being paid to promote and which I have never touched in my life and would never use without the cold metal of a glock pressed hard against my sweating temple. I am infinitely thrilled by the way the interface lags constantly, due to the need to have one thousand unnecessary animations rendered on hardware ripped wholesale from a ten year old phone. I feel myself borne aloft on wings of pure joy when I am notified that my data will be collected and analysed to determine my usage patterns. Even now I am writing this from a field of beautiful flowers and soft luscious grass as I lie and look up happily at the bright blue sky, smiling happily to know that this is the future of technology

  • N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 month ago

    I remember the ancient times when you could buy something, turn it on, then have it do what you want it to do. Setting the clock was the difficult part. Other than that, it just worked.

    • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Learning ESPHome has been the most liberating thing. Take back control of your home. Local first. Privacy respecting.

      • renard_roux@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I spy a research rabbit hole in my near future … 🐰

        Edit: ESPHome is a system to control your microcontrollers by simple yet powerful configuration files and control them remotely through Home Automation systems.

        • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Maybe give https://nowsci.com/only-sensor a shot? I built the guides/schematics/models for ESPHome devices as a learning experience for myself.

          @SkyNTP@lemmy.ml I felt the same way. Now I just keep making new things for it, currently on garage door opener, blinds opener, and may even automate turning on my DIY solder fume extractor.

      • tetris11@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Esphome is limiting though. Want to have a sensor that spawns a camera stream only on PIR detection, and then sleeps? Forget about it, those two will run in parallel, and the debug messages are terrible.

        I find it more liberating to write in C, and then setup my own mqtt protocols when I want for HA to interact with

        • Tja@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I agree. A few years ago I wanted to activate a fan based on temperature in a server cabinet, and offer a REST and MQTT APIs (for HA). It was impossible with ESP Home for some reason, if you added the Bosch 280 sensor you couldn’t use MQTT. Very arbitrary limitations.

          It took me less than 2 hours to build it with an ESP32 + Arduino. It’s all libraries that you just need to put together at this point, barely any logic at all.

    • wia@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Get in car after SO used it. Her BT connects. She goes into BT settings and disconnects. The phone auto reconnects. She turns BT off. The phone turns it back on. She is stuck in a loop. I can never connect phone ever again.

      Technology is amazing.

      • renard_roux@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        either

        Is there any indication that they won’t implement this shit at some point?

        Also, should we be trying to come up with the most insane “features” in this vein that we can imagine (knowing full well that some corporation will come up with them eventually), and then patent them to protect humanity from them?

        Is there any organization that collects patents just to block them (in the consumer’s favor)? A kind of white-hat patent troll? And, if not, should we create one?

  • OmegaLemmy@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    These fucking televisions have less ram than my fucking 8 year old phone

    At some point it’s just better to factory reset this bitch and paste an RPI in the back with my own android TV so it can actually run with 8gb ram 256gb space

      • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        The smart ones are sold at cost or at a loss, and your privacy is then sold to subsidize the profits. A dumb tv costs more money up front (since it’s not subsidized by your privacy), but it costs far less in overall value. It’s a tradeoff that the consumer needs to make. The lovely thing, is that (for now, at least) it is still a choice we can make.

          • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            Not all tvs allow you to do that. Some require you to be online. Some took it a step further and are equipped with 4/5G modems to bypass your network restrictions.

            • hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Some require you to be online.

              I’d take it back to the store as broken. Never heard of that though.

              Some took it a step further and are equipped with 4/5G modems to bypass your network restrictions.

              Never heard of this either and it would raise a massive stink in the EU. Can you share an example?

              • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                Both of these were in the USA. The first was with a friend’s purchase, the latter was an article he sent me. It’s been a little while, but I know one was Samsung, but can’t remember the other brand or which was which.

                • hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  I wouldn’t put it past Samsung to try and force you to have internet access enabled so they can spy on you.

                  However having additional hardware to directly access the internet via cellular is a bit much. That might have been an Aprils fools article by some IT site.

                  When Sony tried to install root kits on PCs of folks just trying to watch a movie on a legit purchased DVD there was a quite large shitstorm.

        • Piece_Maker@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Which is an entirely fair compromise for people who use Lemmy, but means precisely nothing to the majority.

          • locuester@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            Well that’s not true. They have been in business for 40 years. They sell TVs for people who don’t want anything except video in. Mainly commercial places like offices, stadiums, etc.

              • locuester@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                30 days ago

                I’m not understanding what the point is that you’re trying to make? I’m sorry.

                • Piece_Maker@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  30 days ago

                  I said that the privacy concerns being worth the cost of a “smart”-free TV means nothing to the majority of people.

                  You said that this isn’t true, and that their main customer is commercial places.

                  I suggested, in response to this, that the majority of people don’t own such commercial places.

                  What part are you not understanding?

      • DdCno1@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Keep in mind that these are low-end TVs with, according to reviewers, generally subpar picture and sound quality, with quality issues that make them worse to look at than even old TVs. If you just need “a TV” and your only concerns are that the device is flat, the image in color and some sort of noise is escaping the speaker holes, they’ll do, but don’t expect anything more than that. To me at least, it makes more sense to not connect a smart TV to the network and use a separate streaming device attached to it.

        I would even buy a slightly older used dumb TV from a reputable manufacturer over one of these sketchy things, since it’s not like LCD TVs are finicky technology - they tend to last for an incredibly long time in my experience, easily 15 years or more. On my parents’ 2008ish Toshiba (1080p and every analog and digital input in the known universe, which, in combination with an excellent analog upscaler, makes it awesome for old games consoles - but it’s of course no looker in terms of colors by modern standards), the only thing that has broken so far is the spring of the power button, so I bent a wire press it in and a switch at the plug to be able to turn it off completely.

        This is getting a bit off-topic, but a relative of mine replaced her flatscreen TV from 2002 (!) just two years ago - and it was still working fine, but since it only had an analog tuner and SD resolution, she was looking for an upgrade. I got her a small 4K OLED from Samsung (since discontinued) and she’s very happy with it (even the “smart” features are quite inoffensive), although I did have to get her a soundbar as well, because if there’s one thing that has regressed on TVs, it’s sound quality, in part due to how ever thinner and lighter designs have reduced speakers to little more than phone speakers on some devices.

  • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    Generally it’s not too hard to disable the smart TV part of it and just use HDMI for TVs running Android. But on Roku TVs for whatever reason you need to connect them to the internet and a Roku account at least once to unlock the picture settings. Hardware features of a TV like brightness adjustment have no business relying on some random server.

  • Teknikal@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    I’m actually quite happy with mine I don’t think it’s shown me a single ad, the only nuisance is it doesn’t stay connected to my WiFi and only joins when I launch an app or something.

    Its a Toshiba with Vidaa Os I think, not saying it’s perfect it has all the UK channel apps but not Stremio which I would like it to have.

    That said it hasn’t done a single thing ad wise to annoy me unlike my firetv cube.

  • tree@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    I wish there was a company like Fairphone or Framework laptops but for TVs.

      • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Probably too many models with too many varying components for anyone to bother trying…

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      LCD panels do exist. They are just very expensive because they are not made for consumers and have no ads or data collection.

        • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Tbh I bought my last tv when 1080p lcd was the hot new thing and it was NOT cheap. If buying a dumb tv/“display” is just the same thing I’m used to? Fine.

          That lcd is still kicking though so I won’t find out until it’s dead.

      • xthexder@l.sw0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        These don’t seem to be particularly new panels. $600 and only 97% of the sRGB color space (= ~78% DCI-P3), meanwhile a similarly priced LG “QNED” can do 90-95% of DCI-P3. I’m not sure you can even call those TVs HDR if they’re only 8-bit color. None of these models can even remotely compare to a brand new OLED TV.

    • Pechente@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Can you give a recommendation? I too looked for big displays and found commercial ones to be used as digital billboards but the specs weren’t all that good (no oled, no hdr).

    • renard_roux@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      We have a Samsung “smart” TV, hooked up to an AppleTV box. The TV’s original remote is in a drawer somewhere, forever unused.

      I have the apps that I need, the tiny Siri Remote turns on the TV and handles volume, and, apart from the aggressively, insanely, mind-blowingly horrible on-screen “keyboard” / text input (we don’t have Apple phones we can use to mitigate this, sadly. Also, what the fucking fuck, Apple?!) we’re happy. For now. I trust Apple to make the experience incrementally worse as a fact of life.

      Not perfect, but leagues better than dealing with Samsung’s interface.

  • Fridgeratr@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I have a Samsung smart TV and the operating system on it is so annoying. It’s so slow, has dumb ads, and I can’t cast to it like at all.

    I’m even more pissed that they just disabled the Steam Link app for essentially no reason; it worked great for streaming games from my PC.

    I’ve been thinking it would be cool to flash a different OS onto it, but I’m not sure if that’s actually possible.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I was dumb enough to get a random Samsung phone for a while. The ROM was on the SoC so it wasn’t possible to change short of getting out an atomic force microscope.

      Sounds like smart TVs usually have older hardware, though, which could actually be a saving grace.

  • mctoasterson@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Luckily the YouTube app gets way worse with each update. Mine now tries to dark pattern you into signing in, and now features extra ads when you pause a video.

    I’m switching to sideloaded SmartTube on a GoogleTV with Chromecast dongle.

    • runner_g@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’ve been using smart tube on my fireTV for about 6 months now and it’s amazing. No ads, so many playback options that YouTube doesn’t offer, built in sponsor block is a godsend.

  • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Or: buy a computer, once

    It’s not that hard, the original author is just lazy or ignorant or both.

    My smart tv is a mid ranged i5 from 2012.

    • DdCno1@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Electricity must be cheap where you are. If you have to use an x86 platform, please use a modern one that is both vastly more powerful and adept at decoding video while also needing a tiny fraction as much power and producing next to no heat and noise.

  • Skunk@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Ah! I was reading that post yesterday https://lemmy.world/post/22309068 as I am looking for a 55’ 4K oled dumb display.

    So far no joy.

    Apparently some manufacturers makes internet mandatory at first boot and even if you block or disconnect it later it will nag you for firmware update every now and then.

    The only possibility I have found for an EU customer at the moment is Sony Bravia. Yup Sony sucks but apparently Bravia’s let you choose to refuse the terms of service and not use the smart things, thus making them dumb tv.

    But maybe I’m wrong, maybe it’s not the case anymore or maybe they will decide to change that.

    That sucks, if any of you knows about a commercial display/computer monitor/dumb tv in oled 4K hdr 55’ available in Europe, I might fall a little bit in love with you.

    • Icarus@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I recently got a TCL TV that has Google TV on it. The reason I chose it, even tho it’s not the highest quality 4K capable TV, is that on first boot it gives you the option to choose dumb TV or smart TV modes. Have never connected it to the internet. Maybe you would have some luck looking into that!

    • GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      AFAIK, LG still do not require internet access on first startup.
      At least on their medium/high end lines (C and G series).
      This was a hard requirement for me. Mine has never been on the internet.

      • Skunk@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        That’s good to know, thanks.

        But after my message this morning I decided to try out my xgimi projector in the living room instead of the bedroom.

        It is perfect like that and I will give the tv (old LG 1080p). A bedroom is not a home cinema anyway, because you don’t want crumbs in the bed 🙄

    • Pechente@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I recently got the Bravia XR-55A95L probably going through the same thought process as you. You can indeed just skip all the TOS and set it up as a Basic TV.

      However: The software is crap. Complete garbage. Random reboots - I already had to reset it once completely because it no longer showed a picture (and then set it up again). Every day it will show you a notification that it’s not connected to the internet DESPITE having networking disabled completely.

      I tried to update the TV from USB and it failed every time. I eventually gave in and connected it to the internet to update it only to see that I‘m already on the newest version (which I assume is also why updating from USB failed with a generic error).

      I never had this much trouble with a device that costs as much as a MacBook or a high end gaming PC and I would’ve already returned if the competition wasn’t even worse.

      • Skunk@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Ah shit.

        Thanks for the feedback, it is greatly appreciated as those things are expensive.

        I guess we are fucked until the EU make a new pro-consumer law. But that would take years (if they ever make it).

        Another possibility would be to use a projector (it is only for homelab NAS movies afterall). I have a xgimi in my bedroom and it is somewhat great once connected to the free AppleTV my ISP gave me. Otherwise the default google tv OS on it is pure shit.

  • astronaut_sloth@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is why I am dreading when my 2017 dumb TV dies. It’s really telling that dumb TVs, which should be cheaper to produce and sell, are either not available or very expensive (as in commercial displays). Really proves the point that the consumer is really the product.

    • oatscoop@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Projectors come with their own set of issues, but at least you can still get a really good one without all the “smart” features.

  • seemefeelme@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I never understood why people hated smart TVs until one day mine decided to install an update that presents me with advertisements and a hub screen when I turn it on. If I don’t select something in time, the screen disappears, which locks all of the controls, and I can only reset it by turning it off and on again. Why??? Just why?!?!