• Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      Trump said he wanted submarines for the parade. I don’t think he knows the concept of a submarine, dragging one on the streets probably makes it not surfacable anymore.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think he thinks the Navy has those little dinky two man subs that the Japanese used for Pearl Harbor. I don’t think he realizes that even if you could find a trailer to put one of our nuclear subs on, it would destroy every single street it touches just from sheer mass alone.

          • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            16 hours ago

            Kinda. It would involve The Navy moving heaven and earth for him, logistically and security speaking, but they do that as a normal operating procedure.

            It would also involve him being able to get inside one, which is another logistical challenge, as I don’t know if a crane or pallet jack would be more useful in this particular exercise.

            Also would involve him actually giving a shit about the reality of the military and the veterans, which we all know that he despises, based on almost a decade of him openly insulting the military in general, and the rank and file directly.

  • Gina@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 days ago

    Devils advocate: propublica was warning for a few years that the navy wasn’t putting enough into maintenance/training, vs contracts for shiny new boats.

    • kbotc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      The guy in charge was promoted to rear admiral late last year, was put in command in late February.

      The real issue, though, is what the fuck is a CVN doing that close to the launchers.

      You have a ship full of planes. Keep it away from shore and have the planes drop bombs and cruise missiles from far away, or better yet, use the B2s on Diego Garcia, or just the airfield at Al Udeid is right there if we could just ask Saudi Arabia nicely to use their airspace, but no the Fox News Drunk needs his “show of force” to be scary so it has to be visible from shore.

      • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        It’s sort of ridiculous how dumb they are. I think you’re right, that they’ve staged a bunch of ships off shore like it’s WWII to be “scary” vs offering up surprise death from above by an enemy the Houthis cannot attack or anticipate, all brought to them by a partnership of their neighbor countries.

        The latter is scary in many ways, whereas the former is result of people who confuse TV with reality.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    This wouldn’t be happening if they weren’t running sorties to attack Houthis for the crime of fighting back against Israel’s genocide of Gaza.

      • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        It happens often. It’s like school shootings. When it’s a regular thing, is not in the news anymore.

        • Tikiporch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I’m not trying to move the goalposts or anything – and appreciate you providing some context to your claim! – but class A mishaps start at $2.5mil, and these are $70mil jets, which I think is what makes it noteworthy when you combine it with the quick turnaround.

          • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            14 hours ago

            Engine fire leading to ejection. Event Cost $71,000,000

            Two CH-53 helicopters crashed while on training flight. All 12 crewmembers deceased.

            AV-8B experience catastrophic engine failure during takeoff. Event Cost $62,800,000

            AV-8B experienced loss of thrust, pilot ejected safely. Event Cost $62,800,000

            2xF/A-18F Collided during Air-to-Air training. 2 aircraft lost. No fatalities. Event Cost $173,580,662

            The list goes on and on. Remember, only 2.5mil damage with these expensive aircraft is hard. Most accidents lead to complete loss of aircraft. Minor damage already runs into many millions of dollars. Even a minor error during landing on a carrier results in a ditch in sea most of the time. When there is an issue during take off, flight or landing, ejection is standard procedure. This leads to complete loss of aircraft. It can be a result from poor maintenance, constant exposure of sea water, bad weather, human error, etc.

    • ramble81@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s like saying “why are measles news? It happens more often than you think”

      The point is: it shouldn’t be happening. We’re starting to see outward signs of a decaying system. If their personnel were correctly trained, with following proper procedures (for example, securing all equipment and vehicles to the deck) this wouldn’t happen.

      It’s news because “it’s happening” period.

      • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’ve served in the navy for 15 years. Never have I ever seen any navy more incompetent than the US navy. Once I even singlehandedly prevented them from shooting down their own helicopter which returned from Germany back to their ship from a medevac. The helicopter forgot to turn on their IFF transponder and the ship was shouting warnings on the wrong channel. Once I met a navigation officer who didn’t know port was red and starboard was green. How can you be a navigation officer, the standard buoys are red and green. It’s like a baker who has no clue what yeast is. During one of my deployments there was bad weather and a US carrier in the vicinity lost 3 aircraft and had 2 badly damaged because they forgot to tell the deck crew there would be bad weather so the aircraft weren’t properly locked to the deck. Oopsie. Once on the Mediterranean there was an Arleigh Burke demanding all other shipping to stay clear 10 nmi to avoid collision. This was nearly impossible and would disrupt all traffic, because ships were sailing through shipping channels. 10 nmi is ~18.5 km. Once during an exercise they accidentally shot a Turkish ship pretending to be the enemy with real ammo, destroying the bridge and killing everyone on it including their captain and commander. That’s why Turkey now has 4 OHP frigates.

        I can go on and on about how stupid the US navy is. I have loads of stories, can’t even count them.

          • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            Nah, they aren’t stupid. It’s not like they would be engaged in a war for over 20 years with nomads armed with rusted AK’s and still lose or something. It’s not like blue on blue ever happens.