• drolex@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      70
      ·
      2 days ago

      Let me guess, you’re someone who, hmm, finds information on Wikipedia and, aaah, has an interest in decentralised open-source projects. The spirits tell me you are not a fan of Windows and you dislike genocidal maniacs.

    • Courtney (she/her/they) @lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      2 days ago

      I once saw someone with a name tag get bent out of shape when the “reader” somehow managed to get her name from the ether. And then she got mad at me for pointing out her name tag.

    • Klear@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 days ago

      To add to this, tarot and other divination methods are a great way to tap into your subconscious to get this kind of insight even if you can’t do it normally. Every card can be a lot of things and having a bunch of them in various places could be interpreted in many ways, but (if you’re good at it) your mind will snap into one specific interpretation according to your unconscious biases and convinces itself it is the only way to read that configuration.

      • eleijeep@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        The fact that so many people fall for cold-reading tells us why there are so many people that think that LLMs are intelligent.

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Our office brought one of these “management mentalist” guys to a retreat as entertainment and I just got a kick out of lying to them so they would always be wrong.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        A management mentalist at a work retreat. I’m amazed you are alive to tell the tale, I would’ve offed myself.

  • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    My favorite part of this is when people do it to me and they are almost always 100% wrong.

    they get really mad and call me an asshole. because apparently i’m suppose to just agree with their shit takes about me.

    • Donkter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      I take a little pride in this too. Not because I’m not easily judged (you would be right about a lot of things based on my looks) but I keep quite a few hobbies that no one would suspect and don’t have many interests that are in the orbit of what might be guessed.

      It lets me know when someone starts treating me like they’ve “clocked” what type of person I am since it’s clear when someone thinks they’re appealing to you/flattering you but completely whiffing.

      • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        yeah, it’s a big tell for narcissistic personalities. they do a lot of cold reading to flatter people and win them over so they can start manipulating you.

    • Daisy (she/her)@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      They hate it when I mention that the stars move in the sky, so the constellations not only move but also change shape.

        • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          3 days… I think the same sperm could have made it… It’s possible strictly speaking

          • applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            it would have to be the identical sperm to produce you, which is highly unlikely. which sperm gets there first would be highly chaotic, so even if it was the exact same load just a small difference in time would likely mean a different sperm would get there. theres potentially hundreds of millions of sperm in a single ejaculation, so with even odds for each you have a better chance of winning the lottery than existing in this scenario.

            • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              Yeah, this also means that you wouldn’t have to go back and kill your grandfather for the grandfather paradox. You wouldn’t even have to cock block him. Just shake his hand. Hell, just be on the same busy street or sidewalk as him, or exist at all far enough ahead of the event, and chaos will take care of the rest.

    • drolex@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s some Scorpio skepticism. You’re a victim of the influence of the stars smh

      • whiskers165 [she/her, she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        They told me how many snakes we would catch in the woods by Asheville (6 copperheads)

        Told someone where to find their friend at the burn accurately

        Told some people their children would find success, others that their music career would go nowhere

        It told someone their relationship was failing while they bargained with the board asking additional questions

        If anyone asked something like, “should I move to Atlanta?” “Is there anything for me in Atlanta?” The board always emphatically said FUCK NO

        I probably spent about 15 hours doing readings over last weekend at a regional burn, been working on creating the set for a few months. Surprisingly magical, surprisingly accurate, at least if you ask it questions that can be verified within a day or two

        The map is a work in progress, adding little sketches to it periodically until it’s filled out completely

        My partner and I doing readings, I’m the elf :p

    • DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t think it’s technically correct, but that word has been mangled so badly at this point that I would say the way it’s used here counts as common usage.

      • Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Thanks! Got me confused when reading the whole post but then I guessed something like what you just said already.
        Just wanted to have some confirmation.

          • hakase@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Speaks better English English closer to an arbitrary standard than most native English speakers

            That’s what usually happens when you focus on learning the “standard” in isolation instead of being exposed to stigmatized non-“standard” dialects as a child as you acquire your mother tongue.

            Happens with literally every language.

      • Klear@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s not mangled, it’s just used as a hyperbole. When you say someone is tall as a mountain you’re not mangling the word “mountain” in doing so.

        • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          When you say someone is literally as tall as a mountain, that literally means that they would be at least 2,000 feet tall.

              • Klear@piefed.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                2 days ago

                Not always. When I say my head literally exploded, the word “literally” absolutely is a hyperbole.

                • hakase@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  This comment is literally correct, and all of the responses to it are /c/badlinguistics, so of course this comment is the one that gets downvoted.

    • thekidxp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah both of those uses are fine in English. The first usage is “more” correct I would say. Literally is supposed to be used to basically say that the thing is actually happening. The second usage is also common at least in American English. Usually it’s used with common figures of speech. “I was literally judging books by their cover.” Technically he wasn’t, he was judging people. Some people will be pedantic and call you out for that. So if you’re taking an English class I’d avoid that usage but it’s really common to hear it used that way. “I would literally die.” It strengthens the phrase.

      • Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Thanks!
        And I’ve heard similar expressions like in the last example you mentioned being used before, so should have known by myself…

    • robot_dog_with_gun [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      yeah. it maybe looks like it isn’t because because he’s not literally looking at books but “judge a book by its cover” is an idiom so i’d say this is a correct literally rather than the shitty 2010s literally that means figuratively.

    • bandanawearingbanana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      I love him, it’s so obvious most of his stories are made up bs for clicks and I’m here for it!

      It’s like hearing a wildly exaggerated story being told by that one friend but you don’t say anything and don’t interrupt because he’s a good storyteller.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Yeah I was gonna say the same!

      He makes good content, is often quite funny, has insightful and honest takes… I don’t agree with him on absolutely 100%, but, he’s a straight shooter, not shilling anything… kinda guy you could actually agree to disagree with on less consequential stuff… which is rare, and admirable.

      Hope his foots doing better… fuck, that shit was crazy.

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    21 hours ago

    This isn’t even remotely how tarot works lol. I now he said that, but like… I’d be pissed if I paid for tarot and got whatever the hell he’s doing.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I mean if you want your tarot readings to be accurate, you’d want exactly that. And I’m pretty sure that every remotely successful tarot reader does that.

      Wtf the cards gonna do on their own? lmao

      • modus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Sounder like he’s getting just as much entertainment as his clients. Everyone’s going home happy.

  • TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Good for him. Get that moonay.

    I have a friend who is pretty spooky at it. Believe me I use to be a tarot doubter but she is legit in tune with something.

    When she told me she couldn’t go to antique stores because of energies I was sure she was full of shit. Then I kept seeing things that made me be more open to it.

    Like pulling the death card then a random downpour of rain type shit. One of many.

    She’s a witch.