• Techno-rat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Thats cute.

    Look at the danish mountains and despair

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Himmelbjerget

    Sky Mountain! a whopping peak height of 140m elevation. A hike so deadly that it is a time honored tradition to let our kindergarten aged children ‘climb’ it. Takes an afternoon (barely) and theres a small giftshop selling icecream and knick knacks on top of it.

    Try and best that yanks! 😎

  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    7 days ago

    I love my Cascades and the Rockies are majestic and impressive, but the Appalachians are basically the wizened old crones of mountains. They’re weird and mysterious. They’re full of forests and traditions and stories. They demand respect.

    Also, listen, folks from the eastern Midwest are barely used to hills then having to drive through them is scary.

    • Lumelore (She/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’m in Minnesota and I get super carsick just driving in Wisconsin. I’ve gone up the mountain on Orcas island in Washington and it was very beautiful but I actually thought I was gonna hurl. It feels just like those pirate ship carnival rides. I really don’t know how people ride those without getting sick.

      However the small mountains (more like big hills tbh) along the north shore of Lake Superior are fine and don’t make sick at all for some reason.

    • Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Don’t forget, they are older and LOCATED IN THE RIGHT SPOT! Fucking Rockies just decide to pop up wherever they feel like.

      Edit: spelling is hard

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      A decent number of the Appalachians have roads that go near the top.

      • Speltrong@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        That just means they have better engineers and braver drivers, or the mountains are older and they had more time

        • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 days ago

          braver drivers,

          I used to joke that there were no bad drivers in WV, you either learned how to drive or you fell twenty feet off the road and got impaled by a tree. Unfortunately, since I was a kid we’ve put guard rails on a lot of those places.

  • The Sierra Nevadas are no joke. If you drive through them in wintertime you are absolutely taking a risk, not only because you’re driving on windy (if well-maintained) mountain highways, but you may get stuck in snow despite your chains and will freeze to death.

    If you are lucky, a CHP or forest ranger may see you and help you out.

    Heaven forbid you have engine trouble or run out of fuel.

    • lgmjon64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      I live in the Sierras and always keep a change of clothes, 72 hours of food and water (plus filter), a small pack, fishing gear and a radio in my car. You never know what could happen. I’ve had quick fishing trips turn into unplanned overnighters and had snow or fallen trees or wildfires block roads at all times of the year. We have exactly 2 roads into and out of our little valley.

  • JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    I love love love listening to my Western friends complaining about how much more difficult Appalachian trails are. See this creek bed? That’s the trail. No pansy switchbacks to keep the grade nice. If there’s a headwall, we’re going straight to the lip.

    • Pistachio@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      A triple crowner once said the hardest of the three trails physically is by far the AT, but it is the easiest logistically. The easiest physically is the CDT but is the most dangerous because of the logistical difficulties. The PCT is the nice middle ground

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’ve lived in several places, all FLAT. Whenever I visit a mountainous place like Denver, it always seems so weird that there are these mountains always looming over me. At least you always know which way is west.

    • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      I grew up in hill country and I cannot for the life of me understand how people live in the flatlands. It makes me physically uncomfortable.

      • GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Oh god, same. I’m a mountain kid, the plains make me agoraphobic as hell. I tried living in the Midwest. I literally was slowly going insane, the landscape and the people were driving me crazy. I’m not kidding, I had to come home and restart my prescription.

        Praire madness is so damn real. I thought it was made up. NO. I love my mountains, I can’t live without them.

    • gdog05@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Nice to see a fellow Idahoan on Lemmy. Also, we should never do that lest we get another Ted Cruz.

    • SavinDWhales@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 days ago

      Well, yes and no. It’s describing the real differences between elevation, but of course it’s exaggerated to make the point.

      The colors are not real, either, btw.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 days ago

          Yeah, the difference is really stark. If we weren’t being awful I’d recommend folks check both out because our three major mountain ranges (in the northwest we have the cascades which are volcanic and just kinda near the Rockies) are all super cool.

          The Appalachians are over a billion years old and gorgeous, largely covered in deciduous forests and range from bumfuck nowhere (great for campers and stuff like whitewater rafting) to abutting major cities in the east coast that tourists wanted to see anyways, like a day trip from New York City or not that long from Washington DC. Ultimately though yeah they’re very small mountains because of their age. If you’d like to visit them without coming to the US a bit of the Scottish Highlands are somewhat part of the same range

          The Rocky Mountains were raised during the cenozoic and as such are really tall because they’re pretty young, but also have a ton of dinosaur fossils. They’re majestic purple mountains and home to a major city (Denver) located a mile above sea level. They’re also home to the famous Yellowstone National Park, where we’ve got geysers, extremophilic archea mats, and wild bison and bears. If you like geology or paleontology they’re a great range to check out. They also reach well into Canada for anyone interested in checking them out without visiting the US