Summary

The North Carolina Supreme Court, in a 5-1 Republican-led decision, blocked certification of Democratic Justice Allison Riggs as the winner of a state Supreme Court race.

Riggs leads Republican Jefferson Griffin by 734 votes after recounts, but Griffin claims 60,000 ballots were illegally cast and seeks to have them invalidated.

The court will now hear Griffin’s challenge, with briefs due by January 24.

Democrats criticized the move as partisan, while the lone Democratic justice dissented, arguing there is no basis to delay certification or disrupt the election process.

    • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      26 days ago

      Trump: “oh shit, they’re on to me!.. I’M GOING TO INVADE THE ANTARCTIC AND SOUTH GEORGIA ISLAND TOO!!!”

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        I mean it ended with France becoming a democracy so… Yeah. A lot of nonsense happened, but modern France exists as a result of the French revolution.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          26 days ago

          Yeah after going back and forth for 80 years. Many of which were incredibly bloody.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              26 days ago

              Oh good, thank you for your sacrifice.

              Wait? You want me to live in a civil war hellhole too? Fuck no, fuck you. There are peaceful ways to do this.

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  26 days ago

                  After 80 years of switching back and forth between Republics and Monarchies. With mob violence, civil wars, and brutal crackdowns. Which mostly killed commoners, not nobles. It wasn’t until 1870 that they stabilized as a Republic, because they lost a war to the Germans.

                  We could do that or we could follow the example of the many countries who defended their rights or claimed them by filling the streets with people.

                  I’m not the one with a reading comprehension problem.

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      26 days ago

      Nah this won’t happen. Because there will likely not be an election. Or there will be an “election” with Trump winning 100% of the vote.

    • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      26 days ago

      The Supreme Court will be compromised for life, legislative is next but is already essentially gamed on a state by state level and a “nation undivided” indoctrination, and the executive just needs to play its part to cement the rich asshole oligarchy state. The only way to fix it is a skewed “democracy” every few years where certain votes count more than others and the population is stupid and saturated by propaganda.

    • BrundleFly2077@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      26 days ago

      Every single time I see the professional headshots these people use I wonder this exact thing. To ground things in reality for a moment, is there a cultural component to the upper class far right that makes them more likely to undergo multiple cosmetic surgeries?

      These aren’t normal heads on these people.

  • Lodespawn@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    So … do Americans record who voted what in their elections? Its all well and good to say 60,000 votes were invalid … but how does he know what they voted? It could be pretty easy to argue that poorly recorded voter details would all be for right wing ‘small government’ nut jobs that would have voted Republican. Immigrants also tend to be conservative.

    Given he’s unlikely to be happy that the 60,000 come off his quota, or even with a 50/50 split to cover the fact that no-one knows where they could have come from, does the state have to revote?

    I feel like a good campaign ad for Riggs would include “Griffin is a sore loser and is now wasting $X Million and your valuable time going back to revote, he clearly thinks you and your tax dollars are worthless.”

    • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      26 days ago

      They don’t have the identity, if I remember right these are mail in ballots with a post date missing or some such. They have the physical ballots they can count, or not.

      • Lodespawn@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        26 days ago

        Nah the article says the voter registrations are missing details like drivers licence and social security numbers. But yeah, the 60k votes could be for anyone. You can only assume he sees a revote as a chance to take another spin at the wheel and maybe this time it will land on red.

  • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    26 days ago

    But hey, Democrats relinquished power without resistance on January 6th and had a snowball fight, so they are The Real Winners!

    It got this bad when things were better, and the democrats of today still seem to be the democrats of two decades ago.