the website calls it “the largest firing operation in history” and asks people to submit full names, locations, employers, and pictures by email.

https://www.charliesmurderers.com/

from AlcoholEnjoyer: reminder to never ever look yourselves up on sites like these

edit: WEBSITE DOWN!!!

  • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    117
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Ruining the lives of 20,000 people who support shooting their political enemies seems like a bad idea if you’re trying to avoid it happening more.

    • AlcoholEnjoyer [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      4 days ago

      Seeing how bloodthirsty conservatives were when nobody knew who shot him, they’re itching for any excuse to go out and murder leftists and political rivals. They want to live out their fantasy of a civil war where they get to kill liberals and leftists.

    • redparadise@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      Haha gave me a good laugh at first but then realised that it’s after all their goal to increase the comparably little left wing violence so that those examples can be used to justify the American Gestapo

  • PurrLure [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    4 days ago

    “I think he should be forced to carry that bullet in his body. The bullet has a right to be there because it’s a gift from god.”

    From a based as fuck firefighter asa-explain charlie-kirk

  • mudpuppy [it/its, she/her]@hexbear.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    i found out about this a few hours after it was created (on september 10) and spent five hours setting up an autohotkey script to spam fake names and employers, ai generated pictures, smushed together in a convincing way, but they took down the submission form before i got to deploy it. i reported to namecheap, but they haven’t taken action yet, they might be chuds over there. it might help if more people report to namecheap though. i was gonna stay quiet about it but it seems like it’s starting to get attention. any ideas?

  • HorikBrun@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    4 days ago

    I was going to say: Nazis should be afraid to be nazis. But then I realized, they are. This is the behavior of people who live in eternal panic. It’s manufactured, hallucinated panic, but that’s what it is. What a sad, pathetic way to live, being afraid of everything, all the time.

    • CupcakeOfSpice [she/her, fae/faer]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      4 days ago

      To be fair, not everyone has a choice about living in fear. There are mental conditions that make it where some people effectively can’t not be in fear. I agree the fascists are pathetic, but be careful not to lump our mentally ill comrades in with it. Or, y’know people who are oppressed and constantly afraid like perhaps trans people or ethnic minorities.

    • Evilsandwichman [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      4 days ago

      Do you too remember where you first were when you heard Kirk was Merc’d?

      I was innocently walking my puppies and telling my kids everything was wonderful and the world was a beautiful place, and it started to rain milk and gold, but then I read about the shooting and suddenly I lost track of everything. I started to run and I could hear briefly in the distance my children crying and screaming, and perhaps some weird puppies yelping while being dragged across a floor (I don’t know, I was mostly out of it); I got to a basketball field and I saw all the kids there playing, unaware the world had suddenly fallen in twain. I was powerless and shivering in the rain; I had to do one final thing for the man, one final gift; I ran into the field and picked up the ball (some child was attached to it at the time but I don’t remember it being for long); I ran to the basket and gave it a powerful slam dunk and said through sobs, “this is for you Kirk, this is for you!”

      • Skye [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        🎵Were you in the yard with your cat?

        Were you postin’ on chapo dot chat?

        Do you remember when a chud playing sniper

        Robbed us of the tiny-faced man with the diaper?

        Have you forgotten when we rushed to condemn

        Debatin’ people via rooftop ad hominem?🎶

  • cyberwitch@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    4 days ago

    Funny because doxxing professors that he didn’t agree with was what made Mr Kirk famous in the first place

  • iByteABit [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Free pentesting practice hamas-red-triangle

    The site

    It’s not ready yet until submissions are sent to their email, until then the best some “bad actor” could do is send the personal info of fake people, or even better, the info of people that would support something like this

    • mudpuppy [it/its, she/her]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      id be happy to share part or all of my ahk script and associated resources if anyone has ideas for it. i put most of the time into folders of pics and writing chunks of sentences with lots of variants, the coords and clicks are just the finishing touch

        • Clippy [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          tbh i don’t know, i heard somebody i have some rapport with say they don’t personally visit reactionary sites (such as this due to ip logging) and, am repeating my distrust of visiting such site

          in truth my competency with this field of cyber security is low

          • underisk [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            4 days ago

            generally your IP address isn’t terribly sensitive information. it can be used to verify that something on your network made a request to a server, but not on its own - you need ISP cooperation, or access to a well maintained private database that only major online corps like Google, MS, or Facebook might keep. most random websites arent going to have the means to trace an IP back to a person. if you did something on their website that gave them cause to target your IP, the worst they could reasonably do is DOS you until they get bored or you call your ISP.

            just visiting it can be dangerous if there’s some kind of driveby malware or something, but no more so than any other link on the internet.

            • Clippy [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              4 days ago

              generally your IP address isn’t terribly sensitive information. it can be used to verify that something on your network made a request to a server, but not on its own - you need ISP cooperation, or access to a well maintained private database that only major online corps like Google, MS, or Facebook might keep. most random websites arent going to have the means to trace an IP back to a person. if you did something on their website that gave them cause to target your IP, the worst they could reasonably do is DOS you until they get bored or you call your ISP.

              just visiting it can be dangerous if there’s some kind of driveby malware or something, but no more so than any other link on the internet.

              hm okay thank you for clarifying this - i am currently in the middle of becoming more competent in the field of operation security and was wondering (as you seem somewhat knowledgable in this field) what site/collection of text you would reccommend to read to become knowledgable in this field?

              thank you for your insight

              • underisk [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                3 days ago

                unfortunately, i don’t really have anything to recommend from an opsec perspective. most of what i know was learned from reading documentation when I was working as a web developer, and hosting a few personal servers occasionally. i doubt server/browser documentation is what you had in mind.

                i’ll say that if you’re not really doing anything super spicy you probably don’t have to worry too much about opsec. unless you’re willing to cut out a lot of really convenient online services from your life you’re just going to have to accept that the big tech companies are going to know more about you than you should be comfortable with. aside from them you just need to worry about hackers so: run an adblocker, use a password manager and unique passwords, keep your browser and OS up-to-date, and accept that no matter what you do some dipshit is going to fuck up securing their side of things and you’re probably gonna be exposed in a data breach anyway.

            • Even though this is generally true it is irresponsible to provide this as advise.

              You can’t predict what threats the readers will face or what other risks they make take if they unlearn good security culture habits.

              For all we know there could… hang on a sec… ok my hands are nowhere near the lathe… for all we know there could be another eternal blue level zero day dropping this minute in which case anyone whose ip has been logged recently is toast.

              • underisk [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 days ago

                if a security threat of that magnitude were in play I doubt the people chasing down charlie kirk’s killer would be employing it toward that end. ultimately you simply cannot trust that anything you put into a computer is private or safe. you have to draw the line somewhere, and I don’t think worrying about them nuking every IP that connects to their site with a broadly applicable 0-day is a reasonable place to insist they draw it.

                • you have to draw the line somewhere

                  yes and that line should be simple and consistent inorder for non-techies to follow.

                  The line I’m recommending is:

                  if you don’t trust a site then don’t visit it without additional security measures

                  This does not require someone to understand any specific attack vectors or keep track of which sites are how dangerous in these circumstances requiring this level of precaution and so on.

                  It’s not bullet proof but I’m trusting people here understand that a fascist website is untrustworthy and it’s better they be overcautious than to try to minmax their security.

  • frogbellyratbone_ [e/em/eir, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    zero chance any of the submissions will be vetted.

    easiest defamation lawsuit ever

    edit: if you’re usa and depending on your state (california for sure), you “can’t” be fired for political opinions. the quotes are because you still can be fired but you will have an actionable lawsuit