• harsh3466@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    I want to preface this by saying that I do vote in every election, and I think everyone should exercise their right to vote.

    That being said, both parties are bad. We’re in a class war, and the Democrats are just as beholden/part of the oligarchy as the Republicans are.

    The Republicans are definitely worse than the Democrats. There’s no question there, but what we really need is a fucking revolution.

  • zeca@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    “Both sides are bad” are designed to encourage people to join or form alternative movements. Not voting is a possible, but not necessary, collateral side effect. The strenghtening of alternative movements is the only way out of this bipartisan nightmare, even if today it seems unreachable.

  • marcos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    If you are form the US, you are having your primaries by now.

    Those are the ones where good people appear and need your vote to stay on the race. Go participate there, instead of complaining about the main election.

    • TRBoom@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 days ago

      Just checked ballotpedia and found out that my rep has competition this year. Looked the guy up (Kyle Gauck) and he some ok stuff on his campaign page including that he won’t be taking cash from aipac and expanding healthcare access.

      Aug 11th is voting day :)

    • DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      This is the correct answer.

      The people who support the “both sides bad” argument and the “protest non-voters” are children who still need their parents to order their tendies for them at Chili’s.

      • Get involved.
      • Understand the actual candidates.
      • Vote in the primaries.

      The general election should be the last step in executing your civic duties and by that time you should be voting for your team.

        • DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Get enough people on your side to un-rig them then.

          Bernie should have been the 2016 Democratic presidential nominee against the most easily beatable GOP nominee in recent history, but at the time I was a smug centrist and registered independent and could not vote in the primaries in my state.

          I also voted third party in the 2016 general election because there was no way I was going to vote for Trump or Hillary. So 2016 was my fault. I did this.

          Don’t be me.

  • ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    Now the question is which is easier, convincing millions of people to vote for “anyone not a republican” or convincing a candidate to be more than “not republican”

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Hey, primaries are around now. It’s a great time for that!

      Participate in primaries. THIS is the election you want for that.

      • Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Depends on where you are. My state doesn’t have primaries till August and by then it’s basically already decided.

        • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Same here, most primary candidate drop out before I even get my mail in ballot. Also there hasnt been a fair primary in 12 years so like so for over a decade party direction has been at the mercy of quid pro quo backroom deals, or straight up just appointing a candidate. Why would the next one suddenly be a fair representation of the will of voters?

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      No the real question is: which is easier, bitching online or running for office. I wish 1 in a million people who whinge about lack of candidates would actually go run for something. I’ll vote for you.

      • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Yeah, it appears that Americans aren’t getting the education they need regarding the horrors of fascism. Apparently the largest war in history happening less than a century ago due to fascism isn’t enough. A war that was very well documented, including photographic and video evidence.

    • Digit@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      You mean Republican, right?

      ;)

      Same as Democrats are not democratic, Republicans are not republican. ;)

      Hard work undoing the newspeek this deep into the Orwellian hole.

    • starik@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      5 days ago

      It depends. What it means to be “more than “not Republican”” is different for different people. Some will never be satisfied, and others are just plain wolves in sheep’s clothing trying to drive down Democratic turnout so the fascists can hold power.

      • Signtist@bookwyr.me
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 days ago

        While yes, those groups certainly exist, the majority of people just truly need help from someone who actually cares to help them, and not someone who says they do, but abandons the idea when it turns out to be difficult to supply that help because it never meant that much to them in the first place, if it was ever anything more than talk to begin with.

        Pointing out the tiny problematic groups without even mentioning the much larger legitimate group reminds me of people who complain about welfare because of the tiny group of people that exploit it, completely ignoring the huge amount of people that just need help.

        • applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 days ago

          Every time the welfare thing comes up I respond, so what? Who fucking cares if some tiny minority of people abuse the system if it means the people who really need it have easier access, or access at all? No one abusing welfare is so rich you would argue they don’t need help anyway, unless there’s some sort of corruption going on. Big companies take way more in handouts from the government than people on welfare. Why can’t the big powerful successful corporations pull themselves up by their bootstraps?

  • wpb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    If you guarantee your vote to someone, they will lose any incentive to act for your benefit. It’s really that simple. And if genocide is not a bridge too far for you, God help you, because obviously there’s no limit to what you’ll put up with.

  • Dae@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    Your frequent reminder from the local queer, leftist furry that if “voting didn’t work,” Republicans and billionaires wouldn’t spend billions of dollars on voter suppression and propaganda telling you that your vote doesn’t matter.

    Do your part, waste billionaire money by voting anyway, by any means necessary~

  • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I mean, both sides DO suck. But the decision being made boils down to which side you think has the best chance of leading to an eventual outcome that doesn’t suck. I’m not voting for a party I like, because frankly that doesn’t exist as a viable option, but I’m not going to not vote just because neither side is better than a 3/10. I’d rather the 3/10 than the 1/10.

    I think there’s real value in being honest about your feelings. The people who represent us need to know we think they suck. The people around us need to feel like others have the same struggles we do. The space for nuance does exist.

  • foggianism@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    5 days ago

    Dear Americans, voting for Democrats will get you nowhere, too. I know this is hard, but you will have to start a revolution or vote for a third party in an unprecedented coordinated effort.

    • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Exactly. I personally believe the election is going to be stolen, but nobody should fucking do the job FOR them. Voting MIGHT work, and you can still prepare for ridiculous, shortsighted guerilla fantasies after taking a day to go TRY the easy solution.

    • Digit@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      “But they’ll steal the elections!!!”

      LOL. Yup. That’s the crux of the terror that knocks people out of their considerate, critical, creative forebrain, and pushes them into their reactive social-dominating survival-focused fearful limbic reflex where they’re easier to control.

      This time, America… stop falling for it. :) We can still mend this.

      Fascism only wins if you just give up and let it.

      And so don’t fall for the false dichotomies. ;D

      More than voting may be required. And that does not mean badgering your fellow Americans into deeper divisive groupthink. :)

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    It’s two-fold.

    The overton window has shifted so far that we’re getting warmongering from the democrats.

    ‘Half’ of the congressional left are sleeper agents for the right.

    The DNC keeps pushing right and refuses to do anything to keep us from sliding into authoritarianism. Appeasing the right, Siding with Israel.

    But not voting left is the same as voting right, that IS how the right wins.

    And voting left is just giving them a blank check to keep sliding that window further right.

    Neither party is going to let a third party in.

    Appeasing the left is making them worse.

    The rub, people think if they keep not-voting or voting independent, the DNC will give in and start moving stuff left. They won’t. They don’t truly want to win.

    It’s like fucking Brewsters millions out here, but “None of the Above” won’t fucking help either.

    I think, mostly, we can agree that the agenda of the “left” is the lesser of two evils, but the evils are getting so bad that we need desperately to do something to move the window back left a little.

  • dumbass@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    5 days ago

    I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, you dumb fuck Americans should have voted for Vermin Supreme.

  • Serinus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    They’ll try to shove you off the platform with constant negativity and trying to act like Trump is just a continuation of all the same. If you didn’t care before, why do you care now?

    It’s not. It’s different.

    • Digit@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      I remember 2004, a friend had come back to our home town for new years, and in our fave local pub, he regaled us with stories of what it was like working with Trump. He told us about what a joke of a played narcissist he is, being primed by his psychopathic handlers for a puppet presidency. … It seemed absurd, implausible even, for about a decade.

      I heard recently they were planning on having Charlie Kirk become president in the distant future too… until he grew sense and conscience. Imagine if each of their puppets attain consciousness and conscientiousness… and they have no puppets left to deceive us with… :D

      Imagine if USA had democracy. Cleared up all the election rigging, the fixed proprietary voting machines, the lobbying, the gerrymandering, the electoral college, the voter suppression, the bought corporate media, etc, etc, etc. Imagine if the people in USA got to vote for what they want, not merely under duress to vote against who they don’t want.

      Imagine if it were real…

      • MediumGray@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        6 days ago

        So for fucks sake pick the one that’s slower at it so you have more time to do something about it. It’s not like voting locks you out of any other actions.

        • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          It’s no use asking these people to do any kind of direct action. They think abstaining once every four years will bring an end to capitalism. They’ll never attend a protest or vote in a primary, much less pick up a gun for the revolution.

        • Digit@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          Or, vote for something other than going to the bad place?

          Someone offers you two pills, you don’t have to take either. You can make your own, and seek other options.

          • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            Yeah, but if you say “I don’t care, I have absolutely no preference”, then when kids get blown up in Iran it becomes your fault.

            • Digit@lemmy.wtf
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              Yeah. Don’t say that. Who’s advocating for that? Did you think I was advocating for that??

              • Grail@multiverse.soulism.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                Well, there’s this thing called voting literacy, and the thing is, if your voting literacy is poor, you can say things you don’t intend to say. So yes, you did say “I don’t care, I have absolutely no preference”. And it’s your responsibility to learn enough mathematics to be able to say what you mean. I’m not gonna treat you like a baby and find the intended meaning in what you say, you have to grow up and say what you mean.

                • Digit@lemmy.wtf
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Slanderous misrepresentation. Did not say that.

                  So implausible, it seems you’re just trolling. Or maybe have crossed wires, replying to the wrong thing? … Or maybe have some psyop programs running that you truly believe what you say, with your perception perverted by some kind of groupthink and the false dichotomy fallacies the programming produces? Or maybe narcissistic deflecting and blame shifting and trying to save face rather than entertain an idea and concede the logic and learn from it? Or… maybe you’re on to something sound that you’ve just yet to effectively convey? But then, even if that’s so, we’re back to projecting, with the peculiarly expressed accusation of failing to communicate effectively (~ with mathematics?). And the condescending gaslighting hypocrisy doesn’t help your case much either.

                  If you can quote the relevant parts, I’m happy to hear out your explanation that refutes my claim I did not say that. Especially if you can do it without the inflamed ego toxicity. LOL.

          • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            5 days ago

            The ones who are going to do more are already doing more, and both-sidesing the ones who aren’t is just going to make them do even less. Just let them help with slowing the descent down a bit, that’s the most they’re going to do anyway. It buys time for the ones who are doing something to do something.

            • Digit@lemmy.wtf
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              5 days ago

              Or maybe the accelerationists are right, make the nail rusty enough, fast enough, get the frog realising it has to jump out or it’ll be boiled.

              … if that’s not too much metaphor mixing.

              Solution space may be elsewhere.

          • AngryDeuce@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            I hate this take, because it ignores the reality that this isn’t Europe and that you can’t even get sick in this country without health insurance with risking homelessness, let alone any massive coordinated action.

            Like around here they’re always posting pictures of protests and you look at the people at the protests and it’s all retirees and college kids. Why? Because everyone else is at fucking work because if they’re not at work they miss a mortgage/rent payment and end up living in their car. The majority of US states have at will employment laws meaning they can and will fire you with no notice or even need to provide justification beyond the performative “this termination not due to you being a member of a legally protected class”.

            Wage slaves are still slaves, and telling people today that their inaction means they’re complicit is no different then going back in time 200 years and telling the slaves on the plantations that they’re just as responsible for their bondage as the people that put them in chains. Fuck that nonsense.

        • Digit@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          I’ve long been wary of anyone peddling an “only way”. Yet to find a claim of “only way” that’s not fallacious. Quite scary in this parroted psyop. “Be very afraid! Stay in your reactionary social-dominance totalitarian-psyche groupthink mass formation!” XD Gonna a be a beautiful beautiful thing, when people stop falling for it.

          Y’know there are more than two sides right? And that they’re not even sides? … Beautiful beautiful thing when people snap out of the “lies so big that not even their inverse are true”.

        • Strider@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          As a non US citizen I’ll say it again: you factually only have right.

          The day most realize this will be the start of change.

        • Digit@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Yup. In this case, the Overton Window’s Auth-Right on the political compass. Those on the left half of it call themselves “The Left”.

          not my left

      • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Lol.

        More “bOtH sIdEz” idiocy.

        I’m just sad that more than zero people have upvoted that idiocy. Guess I’ll just take solace in the fact that more than twice as many people have downvoted it.