Lemdro.id
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 17 hours ago

Ask the crickets

mander.xyz

message-square
35
link
fedilink
276

Ask the crickets

mander.xyz

fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 17 hours ago
message-square
35
link
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • essell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Wow.

    It’s zero degrees here in June.

    Weird.

    • Zron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      How did you hear negative chirps?

      Can I learn this power?

      • Revan343@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Try salvia

      • psud@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Using the metric version you can get zero with no chirps. The method doesn’t work at all for the current temperature though, you can’t get -1°C any way

  • Widdershins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I feel like parentheses don’t belong in explaining math if they aren’t used appropriately.

    • LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      30 chirps + (added to) 40 = 70

  • ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Assuming one spherical cricket in a vacuum

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      You can’t hear a cricket chirp in a vacuum.

      The motor is too loud.

  • Mark with a Z@lemmy.kde.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Americans and their units

    • Pazuzu@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 hours ago

      metric is great until you need to do anything practical with it like converting cricket chirps to degrees /s

    • Botzo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      16 hours ago

      !anythingbutmetric@discuss.tchncs.de

  • wewbull@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    …or count the chirps in 8 seconds and add 4.

    Why am I taking 25seconds and dividing by 3? Accuracy?

    • TheMetaleek@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      15 hours ago

      My guess would be better approximation as you avoid a “fluke”, as 8 second is a very short time where nothing could easily happen even with crickets being present

      • yimby@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I’m just bothered they chose divide by 3, instead of 16 seconds divide by 2 which is wayyy easier

    • NuraShiny [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 hours ago

      If you count only for 8 seconds, it will be inaccurate, you need to count for 8 and 1/3 seconds!

  • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Glad to know it’s America and crickets that find fahrenheit more convenient for temperature.

    • Today@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I think that’s how we got fahrenheit.

      • kurwa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Actually it was originally based on the freezing temperature of a brine and human body temperature.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fahrenheit

        • psud@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Really it was “find something that is different to the reseller scales”

          • kurwa@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            It was actually based on an existing scale called the Rømer scale

        • appelkooskonfyt@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 hours ago

          No I’m pretty sure it was crickets.

        • HollowNaught@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Ah, so 32° is when an unknown concentration of human brine freezes, and 98.6° is the average human temperature

          What am I even reading any more

          • Macallan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I think the brine probably froze at 0° F, which ended up correlating to 32° F for regular water. And the body temperature at 100° F ended up correlating to 212° F for water to boil. That’s the way I understand it anyway.

            • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              What the hell was the brine that it required it to be 32° below the freezing point of water? Even salt water would have frozen by that point.

            • HollowNaught@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Fahrenheit temperature scale, scale based on 32° for the freezing point of water and 212° for the boiling point of water, the interval between the two being divided into 180 equal parts. The 18th-century physicist Daniel Gabriel Fahrenheit originally took as the zero of his scale the temperature of an equal ice-salt mixture and selected the values of 30° and 90° for the freezing point of water and normal body temperature, respectively; these later were revised to 32° and 96°, but the final scale required an adjustment to 98.6° for the latter value.

  • DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    16 hours ago

    How do you count just one cricket’s chirps? There are usually tons of them.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Everyone counts their own crickets and then you add the results together.

    • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Count faster.

  • NuraShiny [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I guess Summer’s over, it’s 4 degrees celsius where I currently am.

    • propter_hog [any, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      0 where I’m at, hell yeah

      • NuraShiny [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        12 hours ago

        How did you count negative chirps?

        • propter_hog [any, any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Negative occurrences are imaginary numbers, and reading about crickets caused me to imagine hearing them.

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            How many crickets did you imagine? I want to make sure the maths works out.

          • NuraShiny [any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            …I will accept this explanation.

  • not_woody_shaw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I was expecting some kind of Duckworth-Lewis formula.

Science Memes@mander.xyz

science_memes@mander.xyz

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !science_memes@mander.xyz

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

  • !spiders@lemmy.world

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

  • !academia@mander.xyz
  • !science@mander.xyz
  • !scicomm@mander.xyz

Biology and Life Sciences

  • !abiogenesis@mander.xyz
  • !animal-behavior@mander.xyz
  • !anthropology@mander.xyz
  • !arachnology@mander.xyz
  • !balconygardening@slrpnk.net
  • !biodiversity@mander.xyz
  • !biology@mander.xyz
  • !biophysics@mander.xyz
  • !botany@mander.xyz
  • !ecology@mander.xyz
  • !entomology@mander.xyz
  • !fermentation@mander.xyz
  • !herpetology@mander.xyz
  • !houseplants@mander.xyz
  • !medicine@mander.xyz
  • !microscopy@mander.xyz
  • !mycology@mander.xyz
  • !nudibranchs@mander.xyz
  • !nutrition@mander.xyz
  • !palaeoecology@mander.xyz
  • !palaeontology@mander.xyz
  • !photosynthesis@mander.xyz
  • !plantid@mander.xyz
  • !plants@mander.xyz
  • !reptiles and amphibians@mander.xyz

Physical Sciences

  • !astronomy@mander.xyz
  • !chemistry@mander.xyz
  • !earthscience@mander.xyz
  • !geography@mander.xyz
  • !geospatial@mander.xyz
  • !nuclear@mander.xyz
  • !physics@mander.xyz
  • !quantum-computing@mander.xyz
  • !spectroscopy@mander.xyz

Humanities and Social Sciences

  • !archaeology@mander.xyz
  • !folklore@mander.xyz
  • !history@mander.xyz
  • !old_maps@mander.xyz

Practical and Applied Sciences

  • !exercise-and sports-science@mander.xyz
  • !gardening@mander.xyz
  • !self sufficiency@mander.xyz
  • !soilscience@slrpnk.net
  • !terrariums@mander.xyz
  • !timelapse@mander.xyz

Memes

  • !bushrat_confidential@slrpnk.net
  • !science_memes@mander.xyz

Miscellaneous

  • !answered@mander.xyz
  • !mander@mander.xyz
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 3.21K users / day
  • 5.64K users / week
  • 11.1K users / month
  • 23.1K users / 6 months
  • 25 local subscribers
  • 15.3K subscribers
  • 4.82K Posts
  • 123K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Salamander@mander.xyz
  • fossilesque@mander.xyz
  • SciBot@mander.xyz
  • fossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.com
  • UI: 0.19.11
  • BE: 0.19.12
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org