The “not making decisions for me” part is a very Trump-like thing to say. Society only works by compromise.

The part where we all die, because a foreign army invades us, and no one is doom guy.

Part of anarchism that bothers me is that without central authority keeping track of everything my ability to find specific help I need would be solely dependent on whether I or any of my friends know person with that particular set of skills.

The part where I don’t get to make decisions for others. Not really looking forward to the clash that happens when the 2/3s consensus system of Johnsonville upriver comes into conflict with the majority consensus system of Tablesville downriver over the matter of what level of water treatment is necessary before dumping.

  • Damarcusart [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    33 minutes ago

    I really don’t like that Lisa Simpson meme, it only ever gets used by people who want to declare that their opinion is 100% correct and everyone else is wrong, and you just know it’ll be some of the dumbest shit you’ve ever read when you see it.

  • I say this as someone who self describes as a communist, and an anarchist: Most self described anarchists in the imperial core are just anti-cop socdems. The lack of a revolutionary success on the scale or recency as the USSR or PRC has really allowed the term to erode its meaning over the last century; no random lib can hold you to a standard of ideological precepts if they dont have some historical boogeyman to hold you to!

    The most principled anarchists (in my experience) are way closer to your average Marxist-leninist than the state would like to admit. They just organize themselves differently.

  • vovchik_ilich [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Emphasis added:

    Anarchists can organize and fight militarily quite effectively while still maintaining a bottom-up system, as demonstrated by the Anarchist militias of Makhno and Catalonia (and though not Anarchist, Rojava is an example of a decentralized army). The issue all Anarchist attempts have faced militarily is a lack of any allies on the world stage, allowing the authoritarian nations around them to crush them due to lack of supplies (or sudden betrayal of ML ‘allies’).

    “See, tankie? I organized a decentralized army” gets absolutely fucking demolished by an industrial state

    “The problem is just that we had no international allies and we got invaded :(” these people do not understand communism and the withering away of the state when worldwide socialism advances.

    • Collatz_problem [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Makhno was supplied by Bolsheviks and when he came into conflict with them and supply dried up, he was immediately crushed! And Catalonia was literally part of the Spanish Republic and the anarchist militias were integrated as part of its army with full logistical support!

      And ML states also faced those issues: Bolsheviks at first tried to build the army as a network of voluntary militias, got catastrophically owned, and started building a proper Red Army. And the lack of international allies was the horrible nightmare of every Soviet leader until 1945!

  • LeonTreatsky [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Don’t be too hard on the anarchists.

    All of the problems anarchists are trying to solve are problems that communists will need to address over time as the state withers away.

    A socialist state should be filled with experimental anarchist communes that are trying to solve the next puzzle by living it.

  • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The part where I don’t get to make decisions for others.

    If you’re not willing to use force against others to enforce your anarchist ideology then you’re never getting it. What is this if not making decisions for others?

    This whole argument is garbage really. It completely misunderstands anarchism. It sounds like the average ancap rather than an anarchist.